This qualitative case study investigated the impact of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funding on the providers and planners of programs for incumbent workers in one Midwest WIA region. It examines the collaboration and power conflicts that are part of planning and implementing this legislation for the stakeholders. The study applied Matland's ambiguity/conflict framework to WIA implementation. The analysis revealed four themes that are important to policy makers and planners alike. The themes, change agent conflict, power broker conflict, policy interpretation conflict, and ambiguity of means, address the impact of the WIA and related processes on programs for incumbent workers. Conflicts over participants' roles, the interpretation of the legislation, and ambiguity about the process of implementation emerged. This article suggests methods for stakeholders to collaborate and address the needs of incumbent worker development.
Alfred, M.V. (2007). Welfare reform and Black women's economic development . Adult Education Quarterly, 57, 293-311.
2.
Atkinson, R.D. (1999). Building skills for the new economy: A policymaker's handbook. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
3.
Barnow, B.S., & King, C.T. (2003). The Workforce Investment Act in eight states: Overview of findings from a field network study-Interim report. Albany, NY: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government .
4.
Cervero, R.M., & Wilson, A.L. (2006). Working the planning table: Negotiating democratically for adult, continuing and workplace education. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
5.
Cohen, A., Timmons, J.C., & Fesko, S.L. (2005). The Workforce Investment Act: How policy conflict and policy ambiguity affect implementation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 221-230.
6.
Bramucci, R.L. (1999). Community colleges and the Workforce Investment Act. Community College Journal, 69, 40-43.
7.
Employment Development Department, State of California. (2005). WIA overview. Retrieved September 19, 2005, from http://www.edd.ca.gov/wiarep/wiaind.htm
8.
Evelyn, J. (2003). Community colleges push for changes as Congress renews job-training law. The Chronicle of Higher Education , 49(32), A31.
9.
Farrell, E.F. (2002). Job-training law results in fewer federal dollars for colleges. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(14), A20-A21.
10.
Guttman, R. (1983). Job Training Partnership Act: New help for the unemployed. Monthly Labor Review, 106(3), 3-10.
11.
Hansman, C.A. (2005). Planning in communities: Practice and politics in the real world. Adult Learning, 14(2), 10-12.
12.
Hansman, C.A., & Mott, V.W. (2001) Philosophy, dynamics and context: Program planning in practice. Adult Learning, 11(2), 14-16.
13.
Hawley, J.D., Sommers, D., & Meléndez, E. (2005). The impact of institutional collaborations on the earnings of adult workforce education completers. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 21-38.
14.
Hopkins, J.L. (2006). Who has access? The impact of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 on funding resources for incumbent workers. Unpublished master's thesis, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH.
15.
Kerka, S. (2001). Nontraditional employment and training. Trends and issues alert no. 30. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
16.
Kilgore, D.W. (2001). Critical and postmodern perspectives on adult learning. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), The new update on adult learning theory (pp. 53-62; New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education Series, No. 89). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
17.
Levanthal, J. (1996). Future directions in cooperative education. Business Education Forum, 51(2), 23-24.
18.
Matland, R. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity/conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 5, 145-175.
19.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Philadelphia, PA: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor & Francis.
20.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education (Rev. ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Monaghan, C.H., & Cervero, R.M. (2006). Impact of critical management studies courses on learners' attitudes and beliefs. Human Resource Development International, 9, 379-396.
22.
Patel, N., & Strawn J. (2003). WIA reauthorization recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
23.
Savner, S. (1999). Key implementation decisions affecting low-income adults under the Workforce Investment Act. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
24.
Shaw, K.M., & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2006). Work-first federal policies: Eroding access to community colleges for Latinos and low-income populations . New Directions for Community Colleges, 133, 61-70.
25.
Smith, W. (2004). Investing, improving, and measuring workplace skills. Chicago: Chicago Jobs Council . Retrieved September 19, 2005, from http://www.cjc.net/publications/3_Workforce_Dev_PDFs/Investing_Improving_Measuring.pdf
26.
Sork, T.J. (2000). Planning educational programs. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 171-207). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Timmons, J.C., Fesko, S.L., & Cohen, A. (2004). Strategies of support: Increasing the capacity of One-Stop centers to meet the needs of job seekers with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 21, 27-37.
28.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1999). Legislative summary: Workforce Development Act of 1998. Washington, DC: Author.
