It can be difficult to think of teaching critically as a social responsibility within settings that do not appear closely related to larger social values, practices, and problems. The author uses an interpretive ethnographic method to study criticality in the classroom within a job reeducation program designed to prepare laid-off factory workers for employment in clerical positions. The theoretical framework introduces the idea of multiple criticalities in contexts examined at the intersection of biography and culture—that is, working with the individual and social simultaneously and seeing them in relationship. The author examines ways criticalities were fostered, forms they took, and pedagogies that reflected classroom practices. Finally, some of the problems and contradictions of teaching for criticality in this context are examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blundell, S. (1995). Gender and the curriculum of education. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Selected writings on philosophy and adult education (pp. 225-237). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
2.
Brookfield, S. (1991). On ideology, pillage, language and risk: Critical thinking and the tensions of critical practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 13(1), 1-14.
3.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (Eds.). (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Cherland, M. R. (1994). Private practices: Girls reading fiction and constructing identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
7.
Clark, M. C., & Wilson, A. L. (1991). Context and rationality in Mezirow’s theory of transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(2), 75-91.
8.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cunningham, P. M. (1993). Let’s get real: A critical look at the practice of adult education. Journal of Adult Education, 22(1), 3-15.
10.
Cunningham, P. M. (1996). Conceptualizing our work as adult educators in a socially responsible way. In Constitutive Interplay Midst Discourse of East and West: Modernity and Post-Modernity Renderings in Adult and Continuing Education, International Adult Education Conference (pp. 119-126). Korea: Chuang-ang University.
11.
Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Authoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Flannery, D. D. (2000). Connection. In E. Hayes & D. D. Flannery (Eds.), Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning (pp. 111-137). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Foley, G. (1994). Adult education and capitalist reorganisation. Studies in the Education of Adults, 26(2), 121-143.
15.
Foley, G. (1999). Learning in social action: A contribution to understanding informal education. New York: Zed Books.
16.
Hart, M. U. (1992). Working and educating for life: Feminist and international perspectives on adult education. New York: Routledge.
17.
Hill, R. J. (1995). Gay discourse in adult education: A critical review. Adult Education Quarterly, 45(3), 142-158.
18.
hooks, b. (1995). Toward a revolutionary feminist pedagogy. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Selected writings on philosophy and adult education (pp. 198-205). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
19.
Johnson-Bailey, J. (2001). The power of race and gender: Black women’s struggle and survival in higher education. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp. 126-144). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Johnson-Bailey, J. (2002). Race matters: The unspoken variable in the teaching-learning transaction. In J. M. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively. New directions for adult and continuing education, no. 93 (pp. 39-50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue and dialectic. New York: Routledge, Chapman, & Hall.
22.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformational dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Mezirow, J. (Ed.). (2000a). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Mezirow, J. (Ed.). (2000b). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Minh-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
Mojab, S. (2001). The power of economic globalization: Deskilling immigrant women through training. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp. 23-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Newman, M. (1994). Defining the enemy: Adult education in social action. Sydney, Australia: Stewart Victor Publishing.
28.
Newman, M. (1999). Maeler’s regard: Images of adult learning. Sydney, Australia: Stewart Victor Publishing.
29.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Schied, F. M. (1993). Learning in social context: Workers and adult education in nineteenth century Chicago. DeKalb: LEPS Press, Northern Illinois University.
31.
Shore, S. (2001). Talking about Whiteness: “Adult learning principles” and the invisible norm. In V. Sheared & P. Sissel (Eds.), Making space: Merging theory and practice in adult education (pp. 42-56). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
32.
Taylor, E. W. (1998). The theory and practice of transformative learning: A critical review (Information Series No. 374). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, & Vocational Education.
33.
Tedlock, B. (1991). Ethnography and ethnographic representations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 455-486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Tisdell, E. (1995). Feminism and adult learning: Power, pedagogy, and praxis. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Selected writings on philosophy and adult education (2nd ed., pp. 207-224). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
35.
Tisdell, E. (1998). Poststructural feminist pedagogies: The possibilities and limitations of feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 139-156.
36.
Tisdell, E. (2001). The politics of positionality: Teaching for social change in higher education. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp. 145-163). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Welton, M. (Ed.). (1995). In defense of the lifeworld: A Habermasian approach to adult learning. In SUNY series, empowerment and school reform (pp. 127-156). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
