Abstract
The supervisory relationship is at the heart of the institutional and interpersonal structures that make up graduate education, but it is rarely problematized (publicly) or used as a site for the analysis of university adult education. This article results from the challenge issued by a (feminist) woman graduate student to her male nonfeminist adviser to do just that. It aims to encourage others in the field to join the dialogue, to demonstrate how a personal narrative methodology can deepen understandings of the student-supervisor relationship, and to explore how the power dynamics of this relationship affect both knowledge creation (and its legitimation) and the socialization process in graduate education. We alternate between telling our stories, connecting them to the existing literature on supervision, and drawing (different) conclusions about ethics, power relations, institutional and interpersonal responsibilities, research, gender, and the (re) production of academic and (inequitable) social structures in university adult education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
