Contextual and Individual Factors and the Use of Influencing Tactics in Adult Education Program Planning

Abstract

Building on the work of Cervero and Wilson and Yang, this multivariate study examined the relationships between contextual factors (power and conflict in the adult education planning relationship), individual factors (perceived problem-solving effectiveness and years of experience as an educational planner), and different influencing tactics used in adult education program planning. Participants were students and faculty members from multiple adult education graduate programs in North America. Results indicated that in conflicted planning situations, counteracting was favored as an influencing tactic over reasoning and consulting. In consensual planning situations, reasoning and consulting were favored, and counteracting was deemed ineffective. Program planners may benefit from a greater understanding of the power and influencing tactics used in different situations. Further work can better identify and measure the factors that are most critical when negotiating power and interests. Future research should focus on enhancing instrument reliability and validity, clarifying the theoretical model, and using a broader sample of program planners.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archie-Booker, D. E. , Cervero, R. , & Langone, C. (1999). The politics of planning culturally relevant AIDS prevention education for African-American women. Adult Education Quarterly, 49, 163-175.

Blake, J. , & Mouton, P. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Caffarella, R. (1994). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers, and developers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Carter, T. M. (1996). How people's interests affect empowerment planning in a health promotion coalition. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests (New directions for adult and continuing education, no. 69, pp. 27-36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cervero, R. , & Wilson, A. (1994a). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cervero, R. , & Wilson, A. (1994b). The politics of responsibility: A theory of program planning practice for adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 45, 249-268.

Cervero, R. , & Wilson, A. (Eds.). (1996). What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests. (New directions for adult and continuing education, no. 69 [Entire issue]). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Heppner, P. P. (1988). The Problem Solving Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

10.

Heppner, P. P. , & Baker, C. E. (1997). Applications of the problem solving inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 229-241.

11.

Heppner, P. P. , & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66-75.

12.

Johnson, P. , & Short, P. (1998). Principal's leader power, teacher empowerment, teacher compliance, and conflict. Educational Management & Administration, 26(2), 147-159.

13.

Kipnis, D. , Schmidt, S. M. , & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.

14.

Ko, H. (1998). Selected program development models and practices in adult education: A "SUCCESS" model of program development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(03), 691A. (University Microfilms No. AAC98-28277)

15.

Lessem, A. (1997). Negotiating the powers and pressure of planned program implementation: A case study of the Texas Skills Standards Certification Projects. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(04), 1165. (University Microfilms No. AAC97-29225)

16.

Maclean, R. M. (1996). Negotiating between competing interests in planning continuing medical education. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.) What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests (New directions for adult and continuing education, no. 69, pp. 47-58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

17.

McDonald, B. (1996). Counteracting power relationships when planning environmental education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 69, 15-26.

18.

Mills, D. P. , Cervero, R. , Langone, C. , & Wilson, A. (1995). The impact of interests, power relationships, and organizational structure on program planning practice: A case study. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 1-16.

19.

Sork, T. (1997). Workshop planning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 76, 5-17.

20.

Sork, T. , & Buskey, J. H. (1986). A descriptive and evaluative analysis of programn planning literature, l950-1983. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 86-96.

21.

Sork, T. J. (1996). Negotiating power and interests in planning: A critical perspective. In R. M. Cervero & A. L. Wilson (Eds.), What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests (New directions for adult and continuing education. no. 69, pp. 81-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Yang, B. (1996). Development and validation of an instrument to measure adult educators' power and influence tactics in program planning practice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(02), 363A. (University Microfilms No. AAC97-22520)

24.

Yang, B. , Cervero, R. , Valentine, T. , & Benson, J. (1998). Development and validation of an instrument to measure adult educators' power and influence tactics in program planning practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 227-244.