This study examined the problems that four international graduate students of various linguistic and cultural backgrounds encountered in the process of adapting to the requirements of discipline-specific written discourses during their first year of studies in the United States. Qualitative data including participant and faculty interviews, observations, analysis of written samples, and reflective journals kept by the participants were collected. The results of the study suggest that international students, who bring different writing experiences with them to U.S. classrooms, need assistance to adjust more easily to the requirements of the new academic environment. This assistance, however, depends on international students and U.S. faculty alike learning to address explicitly how academic writing conventions differ across cultures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arndt, V.
(1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal, 4(4), 257-266.
2.
Ballard, B.
, & Clanchy, J. (1991). Assessment by misconception: Cultural influences and intellectual traditions. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 19-36). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge. The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
4.
Belcher, D.
(1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
5.
Belcher, D.
, & Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
Berkenkotter, C.
, & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Bizzell, P.
(1989). Cultural criticism: A social approach to studying writing. Rhetoric Review, 7, 224-230.
8.
Braine, G.
(1995). Writing in the natural sciences and engineering. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 113-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Casanave, C.
(1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 83-112). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Choi, Y.
(1988). Text structure of Korean speakers' argumentative essays in English. World Englishes, 7, 129-142.
11.
Connor, U.
(1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students' writing. Papers in Linguistics, 17(1-4), 301-316.
12.
Connor, U.
(1987). Argumentative patterns in student essays: Cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 57-71). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Connor, U.
(1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Connor, U.
, & Kramer, M. (1995). Writing from sources: Case studies of graduate students in business management. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 155-182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
Connor, U.
, & Mayberry, S. (1995). Learning discipline-specific academic writing: A case study of a Finnish graduate student in the United States. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 231-254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
Fox, H.
(1994). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
17.
Gee, J.
(1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Palmer.
18.
Geertz, C.
(1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Geertz, C.
(1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretative anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(1986). No new lamps for old yet, please. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 790-796.
21.
Heath, S. B.
(1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Henry, A.
(1993). Second language rhetorics in process. New York: Peter Lang.
23.
Herrington, A. J.
(1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
24.
Hinds, J.
(1987). Reader vs. writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan, (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Hymes, D.
(1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
Jacoby, S.
, Leech, D., & Holten, C. (1995). A genre-based developmental writing course for undergraduate ESL science majors. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 351-374). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28.
Johns, A.
(1991). Interpreting an English competency examination: The frustrations of an ESL science student. Written Communication, 8379-401.
29.
Johns, A.
, Connor, U. (1989, March). Introducing ESL students into academic discourse communities: Differences do exist. Paper presented at TESOL Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
30.
Jolliffe, D. A.
, & Brier, E. M. (1988). Studying writers' knowledge in academic disciplines. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research: Vol. 2. Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 35-88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Kaplan, R. B.
(1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
32.
Krapels, A. R.
(1990). The interaction of first and second language composing: Processes and rhetorics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(12), 4045A.
33.
LeCompte, M.
, & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press.
34.
Leki, I.
(1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 235-260.
35.
Leki, I.
, & Carson, J. (1993). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 81-101.
36.
Leki, I.
, & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely different worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 39-71.
37.
Lin, C.
(1989). The structure of English and Chinese narrative written by college students in Taiwan. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(5), 2036A.
38.
Moragne e Silva, M.
(1991). Cognitive, affective, social and cultural aspects of composing in first and second language: A case study of one adult writer. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(12), 2429A.
39.
Myers, G.
(1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
40.
Novak, J.
(April, 1997). Developing a theory of professional practice: An inviting perspective. Paper presented at the fifth annual Graduate School Research Symposium, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
41.
Nystrand, M.
(1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6(1), 66-85.
42.
Prior, P.
(1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-311.
43.
Prior, P.
(1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Raimes, A.
(1985). What unskilled students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229-258.
45.
Reid, J.
(1988). Quantitative differences in English prose written by Arabic, Chinese, Spanish and English students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(3), 672A.
46.
Rubin, D.
(Ed.). (1995). Composing social identity in written language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Silva, T.
(1990). A comparative study of the composing of selected ESL and native English speaking freshman writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(10), 3397A.
48.
Silva, T.
(1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677.
49.
Silva, T.
, Leki, I., & Carson, J, (1997). Broadening the perspective of mainstream composition studies. Written Communication, 14(3), 398-428.
50.
Spack, R.
(1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-63.
51.
Spradley, J.
(1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
52.
Swales, J.
(1990). Gene analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Tucker, A.
(1995). Decoding ESL: International students in the American college classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
54.
Ventola E.
, & Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing. Intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55.
Zamel, V.
(1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-182.
56.
Zamel V.
(1990). Through students' eyes: The experiences of three ESL writers. Journal of Basic Writing, 9(2), 83-98.
