This study draws on the perceptions and experiences of upper-division students enrolled in writing-intensive (WI) classes in their majors at a large state university. During extended interviews, students reported confidence in dealing with the writing requirements of their majors and predicted success in future job-related writing situations. The primary bases for this confidence are their experiences with a significant number of WI assignments and their ability to engage a variety of resources and use the knowledge thereby obtained. Students particularly valued research-related writing assignments in the major as opportunities for professional skills development and identity building. The authors discuss findings as they relate to the ideologies of writing across the curriculum and writing in the disciplines. The authors argue for greater attention to students' readiness to make connections across assignments, courses, and disciplines; they also suggest greater attention to a field's inquiry methods and strategies for solving problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, J. M.
(1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334-370.
2.
Anson, C.
, & Forsberg, L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic prose. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361-387.
4.
Bazerman, C.
(1992). From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: Living with powerful words. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp. 61-68). New York: Modern Language Association.
5.
Berkenkotter, C.
, Huckin, T., & Ackerman, J. (1994). Context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student in a writing research community. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum (pp. 211-232). Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press.
6.
Britton, J.
, Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities. New York: Macmillan.
7.
Covino, W. A.
(1988). The art of wondering: A revisionist return to the history of rhetoric. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
Detterman, D.
, & Sternberg, R. (Eds.). (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Elbow, P.
(1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Emig, J.
(1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
11.
Ernst, G. W.
, & Newell, A. (1969). GPS: A case study in generality and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Fulwiler, T.
(1981). Showing not telling in a writing across the curriculum workshop. College English, 43, 55-63.
13.
Fulwiler, T.
(1987). Teaching with writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
14.
Gere, A. R.
(1991). Practicing theory/theorizing practice. In V. A. Chappell, M. L. Buley-Meissner, & C. Anderson (Eds.), Balancing acts: Essays on the teaching of writing in honor of William F. Irmscher (pp. 111-121). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
15.
Gotswami, D.
, & Odell, L. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in non-academic settings. New York: Guilford.
16.
Haas, C.
(1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11, 43-84.
17.
Herrington, A.
(1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-361.
18.
Hilgers, T. L.
, Bayer, A. S., Stitt-Bergh, M., & Taniguchi, M. (1995). Doing more than thinning out the herd: How eighty-two college seniors perceived writing-intensive classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 59-87.
19.
Hilgers, T. L.
, & Marsella, J. (1992). Making your writing program work: A guide to good practices. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Hussey, E.
, Bayer, A., Hilgers, T., & Jones, K. (1995). Writing in Hawai'i high school senior classes: A glimpse into a few windows (Office of Faculty Development and Academic Support Report No. 2). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
21.
Kogen, M.
(Ed.). (1989). Writing in the business professions. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22.
Lunsford, A. A.
, & Ede, L. S. (1984). Classical rhetoric, modern rhetoric, and contemporary discourse studies. Written Communication, 1, 78-80.
23.
MacDonald, S. P.
(1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
Marsella, J.
, Hilgers, T. L., & McLaren, C. (1992). How students handle writing assignments: A study of eighteen responses in six disciplines. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching and learning in the disciplines (pp. 174-188). New York: Modern Language Association.
25.
Matalene, C.
(Ed.). (1989). Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work. New York: Random House.
26.
McCarthy, L. P.
(1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.
27.
Moffett, J.
(1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
Moffett, J.
(1981). Active voice: A writing program across the curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
29.
Myers, G.
(1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
30.
Newell, A.
, & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Odell, L.
(Ed.). (1993). Theory and practice in the teaching of writing: Rethinking the discipline. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
33.
Perkins, D.
, & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound?Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.
34.
Petraglia, J.
(1995). Writing as an unnatural act. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 79-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Polya, G.
(1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
36.
Reynolds, J.
, Matalene, C., Magnotto, J., Samson, D., Jr., & Sadler, L. (Eds.). (1995). Professional writing in context: Lessons from teaching and consulting in worlds of work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Rorty, R.
(1989). Contingency, irony, solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Russell, D. R.
(1995). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870-1990: A curricular history. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
39.
Schon, D.
(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Sorcinelli, M. D.
, & Elbow, P. (Eds.). (1997). Writing to learn: Strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Walvoord, B. E.
(1986). Helping students write well: Strategies for all disciplines (2nd ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
42.
Walvoord, B. E.
(1996). The future of writing across the curriculum. College English, 58, 58-79.
43.
Walvoord, B. E.
, & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
