In the first section, the author addresses the most theoretical criticism of private writing as a false or misleading concept—that writing is inherently or essentially social. The author distinguishes and explores the various forms or senses in which this claim is true; in doing so, the author explores the limitations of certain kinds of totalistic forms of argumentation. In the second section, the author also addresses criticisms that acknowledge the existence of private writing but asserts that it is misguided or harmful. In the final section, the author suggests possibilities for empirical research that might not only throw light on theoretical disputes about the nature of private writing but also provide some concrete help to teachers of writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. L.
(1965). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford.
2.
Bakhtin, M.
(1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259-422). Austin, TX: University of Texas PressSlavic Series, No. 1.
3.
Bartholomae, D.
(1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford.
4.
Bartholomae, D.
(1995). Writing with teachers: A conversation with Peter Elbow. College Composition and Communication, 46.1, 62-71.
5.
Bloom, H.
(1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Brandt, D.
(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of writers, readers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
7.
Bruffee, K. A.
(1984). Collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind. College English, 46, 635-652.
8.
Bruffee, K. A.
(1985). A short course in writing (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Burke, K.
(1969). Rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Burrows, D.
(1990). Sound, speech, and music. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
11.
Dewey, J.
(1958). Art as experience. New York: G. P. Putnam.
12.
Elbow, P.
(1998a). A map of writing in terms of audience and response. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
Elbow, P.
(1998b). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Elbow, P.
(1998c). Writing without teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Feldman, C. F.
(1977). Two functions of language. Harvard Education Review, 47, 282-293.
16.
Gibson, W.
(1980). Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (pp. 1-6). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
Harris, J.
(1990). Expressive discourse. Dallas, TX:Southern Methodist University Press.
18.
Harris, J.
(1997). A teaching subject: Composition since 1966. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Juhl, P. D.
(1980). Interpretation, an essay in the philosophy of literary criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
LeFevre, K. B.
(1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
Mallon, T.
(1984). A book of one's own: People and their diaries. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
22.
Mead, G. H.
(1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Ong, W.
(1962). Voice as summons for belief: Literature, faith, and the divided self. In The barbarian within: And other fugitive essays and studies (pp. 49-67). New York: Macmillan.
24.
Perelman, C.
, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)
25.
Petrey, S.
(1990). Speech acts and literary theory. New York: Routledge.
26.
Prince, G.
(1980). Introduction to the study of the narratee. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (pp. 7-25). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Shaftesbury, A.A.C.
, Third Earl of. (1964). Characteristics of men, manners, opinions, times. (J. M. Robertson, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Library of Liberal Arts-Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1711)
28.
Spigelman, C.
(1998). Habits of mind: Historical configurations of textual ownership in peer writing groups. College Composition and Communication, 49(2), 234-255.
29.
Steiner, G.
(1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Stover, A. (1998). Diaries and “techniques of the self”: An exploration of the relationship between diarists and their written representations of self. Dissertation in progress, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
31.
Trimbur, J.
(1985). Collaborative learning and teaching writing. In B. W. McClelland & T. R. Donovan (Eds.), Perspectives on research and scholarship in composition (pp. 87-109). New York: Modern Languages Association of America.
32.
Vygotsky, L.
(1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfman & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
33.
Winnicott, D. W.
(1965). The capacity to be alone. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
34.
Young, R.
(1987a). Invention: A topographical survey. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: 10 bibliographical essays. Revised and enlarged edition (pp. 1-43). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University.
35.
Young, R.
(1987b). Recent developments in rhetorical invention. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: 12 bibliographical essays. Revised and enlarged edition (pp. 1-38). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University.
