The authors twice replicated C. Haas and L. Flower's 1988 think-aloud reading study, which found that graduate students used “rhetorical” reading strategies to interpret a passage, whereas first-year college students used such strategies hardly at all. Rhetorical reading strategies use suppositions about the social, cultural, and historical context of the writing. The main intent of the replications was to see whether different outcomes might be found if the passage read dealt with a topic more familiar to first-year students. With the original passage, the results roughly supported Haas and Flower. But with the more familiar topic, the undergraduates generated substantially more rhetorical comments than they did with the Haas and Flower passage. Personal narrative and value-laden commentary were also measured, with older students far outproducing first-year students. The caution for researchers and teachers is to avoid hasty assumptions about underlying language competence without considering contextual factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, C.
(1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
2.
Benack, S.
(1984). Postformal epistemologies and the growth of empathy. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 340-356). New York: Praeger.
3.
Bereiter, C.
, & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131-156.
4.
Bissex, G. L.
(1979). Patterns of development in writing: 5-10 year olds. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 197 387).
5.
Bronowski, J.
(1965). Science and human values (rev. ed.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
6.
Bruner, J.
(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Buck, R.
(1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford.
8.
Chandler, M.J.
(1987). The Othello effect: Essay on the emergence and eclipse of skeptical doubt. Human Development, 30, 137-159.
9.
Chappell, V. A.
(1997). “But isn't this the land of the free?”: Resistance and discovery in student responses to Farewell to Manzanar. In C. Severino, J. C. Guerra, & J. E. Butler (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 172-188). New York: Modern Language Association.
10.
Chickering, A. W.
(1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Duin, A. H.
, & Hansen, C. J. (1996). Setting a sociotechnological agenda in nonacademic writing. In A. H. Duin & C. J. Hansen (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology (pp. 1-15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Ericsson, K. A.
, & Simon, H. A. (1994). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Evans, J. St. B. T.
(1978). Toward a statistical theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 621-635.
14.
Flavell, J. H.
(1977). Cognitive development. New York: Prentice Hall.
15.
Flavell, J. H.
(1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
16.
Fontaine, S. I.
(1988). Using what they know:9-, 13-, and 19-year-olds writing for difference audiences. In B. A. Raforth & D. Rubin (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 99-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17.
Geisler, C.
(1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Gray, W. M.
, & Hudson, J. (1984). Formal operations and the imaginary audience. Developmental Psychology, 20, 619-627.
19.
Green, M.
(1985). Talk and doubletalk: The development of metacommunication knowledge about oral language. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 9-24.
20.
Griggs, R. A.
, & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
21.
Haas, C.
(1993). Beyond “just the facts”: Reading as rhetorical action. In A. M. Penrose & B. M. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 19-32). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Haas, C.
, & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the construction of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39, 167-183.
23.
Haas, C.
, & Flower, L. (1989). Reply to Ruth Ray and Ellen Barton. College Composition and Communication, 40, 482.
24.
Huffman, G.
, Edwards, B., & Green, M. (1982). Developmental stages of metalinguistic awareness related to reading. Reading World, 21, 193-200.
25.
Mathison, M. A.
(1996). Writing the critique: A text about a text. Written Communication, 13, 314-354.
26.
McCormick, K.
(1996). The culture of reading and the teaching of English. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
27.
Mellon, J.
(1969). Transformational sentence-combining: A method for enhancing the development of syntactic fluency in English composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
28.
O'Hare, F.
(1973). Sentence combining: Improving student writing without formal grammar instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
29.
Paris, S. G.
, & Schmidt, C. R. (1984). The development of verbal communication skills in children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 18, 1-47.
30.
Penrose, A. M.
, & Sitko, B. M. (Eds.). (1993). Appendix: Conducting process research. In A. M. Penrose & B. M. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 19-32). New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Pressley, M.
, & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Ray, R.
, & Barton, E. (1989). Response to Christina Haas and Linda Flower. College Composition and Communication, 40, 480-482.
33.
Rest, J. R.
(1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
Santostefano, S.
(1986). Cognitive controls, metaphors, and contexts: An approach to cognition and emotion. In D. J. Bearison & H. Zimiles (Eds.), Thought and emotion: Developmental perspectives (pp. 175-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Sarbin, T. R.
(1986). Emotion and act: Roles and rhetoric. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 83-97). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
36.
Smith, W. L.
, & Combs, W. E. (1980). The effects of overt and covert clues on written syntax. Research in the Teaching of Writing, 14, 19-33.
37.
Wade, S. E.
, Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 147-166.
38.
Wason, P. C.
(1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.
39.
Wineberg, S. S.
(1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-520.
