In electronic support groups, people use Internet-based electronic text communication to discuss personal problems or disorders with others who share common circumstances. Although their discussions exist only in the electronic medium, these groups can be viewed usefully as discourse communities. The authors draw on what is known about two other popular sources of help—face-to-face self-help groups and self-help books—to frame the rhetorical challenges faced by members of electronic support groups. The authors then compare the discourse of electronic support groups with that of electronic hobby groups to demonstrate that the two sets differ in terms of the rhetorical behavior of their participants. The authors analyze messages to determine how members establish legitimacy and authority in their texts and how message exchange gives rise to group identity and a sense of community. Our observations indicate that although some discourse characteristics and some rhetorical features are common to all the electronic groups we studied, others are unique to the special requirements of electronic support groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association
. (1989). Report of the task force on self-help therapies. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Archer, R. L.
(1987). Commentary: Self-disclosure, a very useful behavior. In V. L. Derlega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 329-342). New York: Plenum.
3.
Bavelas, J. B.
, Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Baym, N. K.
(1993). Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside a computer-mediated fan culture. Journal of Folklore Research, 30, 143-176.
5.
Baym, N. K.
(1996). Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 315-345.
6.
Borkman, T.
(1976, September). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Review, 445-456.
7.
Collot, M.
, & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 13-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
Coyle, K.
, & Grodin, D. (1993). Self-help books and the construction of reading: Readers and reading in textual representation. Text and Performance Quarterly, 13, 61-78.
9.
Cummings, J.
, Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1998). On-line help: Using electronic support groups on the Internet. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
10.
Dawes, R. M.
, Orbell, J., & van de Kragt, A. J. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83-97.
11.
Ferrara, K.
, Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
12.
Finholt, T.
, & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41-64.
13.
Frable, D.E.S.
(1993). Being and feeling unique: Statistical deviance and psychological marginality. Journal of Personality, 61, 85-110.
14.
Grodin, D.
(1991). The interpreting audience: The therapeutics of self-help book reading. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 404-420.
15.
Gurak, L. J.
(1997). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over lotus marketplace and the clipper chip. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
Hauben, M.
, & Hauben, R. (1997). Netizens: On the history and impact of Usenet and the Internet. Los Alamos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. (An online version is available at http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook/.)
17.
Helgeson, V. S.
, Cohen, S., Schulz, R., & Yasko, J. (in press). Group support interventions for people with cancer: Benefits and hazards. In A. Baum & B. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions and cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Helgeson, V. S.
, & Gottlieb, B. H. (in press). Support groups. In S. Cohen, L. Underwood, & B. Gottlieb, (Eds.), Social support measurement and interventions: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Herring, S.
(1996). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in CMC. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 115-146). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
Hogg, M. A.
, & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
21.
Hogg, M. A.
, & McGarty, C. (1990). Self-categorization and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 10-27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
Howard, T. W.
(1997). A rhetoric of electronic communities. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
23.
Hudson, R. A.
(1996). Sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Humphreys, K.
, & Rappaport, J. (1994). Researching self-help / mutual aid groups and organizations: Many roads, one journey. Applied and Preventive Psychology3, 217-231.
25.
Killingsworth, J.
(1996). Discourse community. In T. Enos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition: Communication from ancient times to the information age (pp. 194-196). New York: Garland.
26.
Kraut, R.
, Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55-65.
27.
Linde, C.
(1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Liu, Y.
(1997). Authority, presumption and invention. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 30, 413-427.
29.
Luke, D. A.
, Roberts, L., & Rappaport, J. (1993). Individual, group context, and individual-group fit predictors of self-help group attendance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 216-238.
30.
Marrs, R. W.
(1995). A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 843-870.
31.
Marsden, P.
(1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122-131.
32.
McKenna, K.Y.A.
, & Bargh, J. A. (1997, October). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “de-marginalization” through virtual group participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
33.
Mickelson, K. D.
(1997). Seeking social support: Parents in electronic groups. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 157-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
(1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259-282.
35.
O'Keefe, D.
(1990). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Orlikowski, W. J.
, & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-586.
37.
Pennebaker, J. W.
(1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 211-244). New York: Academic Press.
38.
Potter, J.
, & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
39.
Reid, B.
(1995, June). USENET readership report for June 95. news.lists. Retrieved from the World Wide Web http://sunsite.unc.edu/usenet-i/groups-html/news.lists.html
40.
Rosenberg, P. P.
(1984). Support groups: A special therapeutic entity. Small Group Behavior, 15, 173-186.
41.
Rosenoer, J.
(1997). CyberLaw: The law of the Internet. New York: Springer-Verlag.
42.
Sarason, I. G.
, & Sarason, B. (Eds.) (1985). Social support: Theory, research and applications. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
43.
Shank, G.
, & Cunningham, D. (1996). Mediated phosphor dots: Toward a post-Cartesian model of CMC via the semiotic superhighway. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 27-41). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
44.
Silverman, P. R.
(1982). People helping people: Beyond the professional model. In The modern practice of community mental health (pp. 611-632). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Smith, M.
(1992). Voices from the WELL: The logic of the virtual commons. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Sociology.
46.
Sproull, L.
, & Faraj, S. (1995). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In B. Kahin & J. Keller (Eds.), Public access to the Internet (pp. 62-81). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
47.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
48.
Stewart, M. J.
(1990). Expanding theoretical conceptualizations of self-help groups. Social Science in Medicine, 31, 1057-1066.
49.
Trojan, A.
(1989). Benefits of self-help groups: A survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups. Social Science in Medicine, 29, 225-232.
50.
Turnbull, A. P.
, Patterson, J., Behr, S. K., Murphy, D. L., Marquis, J. G., & Blue-Banning, M. J. (Eds.). (1993). Cognitive coping, families, and disability. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.
51.
Yates, S. J.
(1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
