Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study into revision skills of 32 elementary students in Grades 5-6 (van Gelderen & Blok, 1989). Their task consisted of improving an expository text, experimentally composed on the basis of several texts written by students of the same age as the subjects. The subjects were asked to think aloud and to give explicit evaluations, diagnoses, and suggestions for improvement of the text. Quantitative data are supplemented with a qualitative analysis of the revision activities. Reformulations and verbalizations during the process are analyzed. The analysis aims at the students' potentials for revision on the level of communicative content. Explanations based on a model of the revision process by Bereiter and Scardamalia (1987) are explored. This model specifies the most important cognitive steps in revision: compare, diagnose, and operate (CDO). Quantitative analysis of revision behavior showed that the subjects did possess the necessary skills to carry out each of the steps under experimental conditions designed to facilitate the revision process. The qualitative analysis, however, showed that many difficulties had yet to be overcome. The study concludes that it would be worthwhile to direct more explicit attention to further development of revision skills of primary students than is the case in current writing instruction at schools.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applebee, A. N. (1982). Writing and learning in school settings. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process and structure of written discourse (pp. 365-381). New York: Academic Press.

Bartlett, E. J. (1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process and structure of written discourse (pp. 345-363). New York: Academic Press.

Beal, C. R. (1990). The development of text evaluation and revision skills. Child Development, 61, 247-258.

Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Blok, H. , & van Gelderen, A. (1990). Schoolbooks for writing instruction badly need improvement [in Dutch]. Didaktief, II20(5), 15-17.

Blok, H. , & van Gelderen, A. (1994). The improvement of written text by students from the upper classes of elementary education [in Dutch]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 4-15.

Damhuis, R. , de Glopper, K. , & Wesdorp, H. (1983). The composition curriculum: Writing skill in secondary education: Theory and practice [in Dutch] (SCO-report). Amsterdam: SCO.

Ericsson, K. A. , & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Faigley, L. , & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.

10.

Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481-506.

11.

Fitzgerald, J. , & Markham, L. R. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction, 41, 3-24.

12.

Flower, L. S. , Hayes, J. R. , Carey, L. , Schriver, K. , & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.

13.

Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529.

14.

Hacker, D. J. , Plumb, C. , Butterfield, E. C. , Quathamer, D. , & Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65-78.

15.

Hayes, J. R. , Flower, L. S. , Schriver, K. A. , Stratman, J. , & Carey, L. (1984). Cognitive processes in revision (Technical report to the National Science Foundation). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267396)

16.

Hillocks, G. (1984, November). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 133-170.

17.

Janssen, T. , & Triesscheijn, B. (1990). The use, content and effectivity of schoolbooks for language and literature in Holland and Flanders [in Dutch]. Gravenhage: Stichting Bibliographia Neerlandica.

18.

Langer, J. A. (1987). A sociocognitive perspective on literacy. In J. A. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy and culture: Issues of society and schooling (pp. 1-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

19.

Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643-655.

20.

McCutchen, D. , & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text, 2, 113-139.

21.

National Assessment of Educational Progress . (1977). Write/rewrite: An assessment of revision skills: Selected results from the second national assessment of writing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196 043)

22.

Newell, G. E. (1994). The effects of written between-draft responses on students' writing and reasoning about literature. Written Communication, 11, 311-347.

23.

Nold, E. W. (1981). Revising. In C. H. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 67-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24.

Oostdam, R. J. , & de Glopper, K. (1986). Materials for text structure in schoolbooks for Dutch language for secondary education [in Dutch]. (SCO-cahier 36). Amsterdam: SCO.

25.

Perl, S. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.

26.

Pettigrew, J. , Shaw, R. A. , & van Nostrand, A. D. (1981). Collaborative analysis of writing instruction. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 329-341.

27.

Scardamalia, M. (1981). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. F. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2, pp. 81-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

28.

Scardamalia, M. , Bereiter, C. , & Goelman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process and structure of written discourse (pp. 173-210). New York: Academic Press.

29.

Sunflower, C. , & Crawford, L. W. (1986). What instructional support do elementary students receive for writing? Moorhead, MN: Moorhead State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 273 962)

30.

van Gelderen, A. , & Blok, H. (1989). Writing instruction in the upper classes of elementary education [in Dutch]. Amsterdam: SCO.

31.

van Gelderen, A. , & Blok, H. (1991). The practice of writing instruction in grades 5-6 of elementary education: Observations and interviews [in Dutch]. Pedagogische Studiën, 68, 159-175.

32.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Wesdorp, H. , & Hoeksma, J. B. (1985). Pilot-study for the periodical assessment of educational progress: Part 1. Reading and writing performances of sixth-graders [in Dutch]. (SCO-report 55). Amsterdam: SCO.

Elementary Students' Skills in Revising

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References