In this study, we trace the development of ideas explored during reading lessons in children's writings from one transitional bilingual fourth-grade classroom. Using transcripts from audio- and videotaped lessons, we describe the ways in which the reading lessons, designed to facilitate discussions to enhance student reading comprehension, turned into an anchoring activity for the negotiation of joint meaning. They served as a springboard for joint exploration and the generation of intersubjective and co-constructed ideas that bridged the worlds of home and school. We trace the development of these ideas in representative pieces from five student portfolios. Discussions served to display a number of important literacy processes, and ideas and interpretations from these discussions reappeared in the students' writings. This study is of particular interest to educators concerned both with understanding better the influence of classroom discourse on student writing and with finding ways to incorporate students' cultural backgrounds into classroom practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Biber, D.
(1988). Variations across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bloom, D.
, & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. International Reading Association, 28(4), 305-334.
3.
California State Department of Education
(1990). California assessment program: Report for “Freeman” Elementary School. Sacramento, CA: Author.
4.
Connor, U.
, & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Cummins, J.
(1981). The role of primary language development in promoting success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education, Division of Instructional Support and Bilingual Education, Office of Bilingual Bicultural Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
6.
Edelsky, C.
(1986). Writing in a bilingual program: Había una vez. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Fairclough, N.
(1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
8.
Ferris, D.
(1994). Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native speakers. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(1), 45-65.
9.
Gee, J.
(1990). Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourses. New York: Falmer.
10.
Goldenberg, C.
(1992/1993). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46, 316-326.
11.
Goldenberg, C.
, & Gallimore, R. (1991). Changing teaching takes more than a one-shot workshop. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 69-72.
12.
Goldman, S. R.
, & Trueba, H. (Eds.). (1987). Becoming literate in English as a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
Green, J.
, & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping an instructional conversation. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161-185). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Heath, S. B.
(1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and at school. Language in society, 11(2), 49-76.
15.
Heath, S. B.
(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hillocks, G.
(1986). Research on written composition. Washington, DC: ERIC.
17.
Hudelson, S.
(1989). Write on: Children writing in ESL. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. [Center for Applied Linguistics]
18.
Krashen, S.
(1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
19.
Lemke, J.
(1985). Ideology, intertextuality, and the notion of register. In J. Benson & W.S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Mehan, H.
(1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 32-64.
21.
Mehan, H.
, & Wood, H. (1976). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
22.
Moll, L.
, & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319-348). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Myers, M.
(1985). The teacher-researcher: How to study writing in the classroom. Urbana, IL: ERIC.
24.
Newman, D.
, Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Nunan, D.
(1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279-295.
26.
Nystrand, M.
, & Gamoran, A. (1991a). Student engagement: When recitation becomes conversation. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 256-276). Berkeley, CA: McClutchan.
27.
Nystrand, M.
, & Gamoran, A. (1991b). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.
28.
Ochs, E.
(1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335-358). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Ochs, E.
, Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Story-telling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes, 16(1), 37-72.
30.
Patthey-Chavez, G. G.
, Clare, L., & Gallimore, R. (1995). Building a community of scholarship: The role of instructional conversation in bridging the worlds of home and school in a transitional bilingual classroom. Educational Practice Report. The National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. University of California, Santa Cruz, and Center for Applied Linguistics.
31.
Patthey-Chavez, G. G.
, & Ferris, D. (1995). Writing, conferencing, and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
32.
Patthey-Chavez, G. G.
, & Goldenberg, C. (1994). Instructional conversations and direct teaching: Potentials and possibilities of disparate learning ecologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
33.
Patthey-Chavez, G. G.
, & Goldenberg, C. (1995). Changing instructional discourse for changing students: The instructional conversation. In R. F. Macías & R. G. García Ramos (Eds.), Changing schools for changing students. An anthology of research on language minorities, schools, and society (pp. 107-135). Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
34.
Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multidimensional perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
35.
Rowe, D. W.
(1989). Author/audience interaction in the preschool: The role of social interaction in literacy learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(4), 311-349.
36.
Saunders, W.
, Goldenberg, C., & Hamann, J. (1992). Instructional conversations beget instructional conversations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 199-218.
37.
Schieffelin, B.
, & Gilmore, P. (Eds.). (1986). Advances in discourse processes: Vol. 21. The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38.
Schieffelin, B.
, & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. In B. Siegel (Ed.), Annual Review of Anthropology (pp. 163-191). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
39.
Scollon, R.
, & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42.
Wilen, W.
(Ed.). (1990). Teaching and learning through discussion. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
