To change the mind of a reader, authors compose written persuasion according to a set of rhetorical features. This article describes the features of persuasive texts and reviews research results to explore whether adults indeed change their minds after reading persuasion. Toulmin's (1958) model of argument and Aristotle's model of persuasive content characterize the structure and content of well-written persuasion. Research in social psychology and text comprehension shows that adults typically build a case for their own prereading belief rather than process a persuasive text mindfully, weigh evidence, and change their beliefs. An important contract between author and reader is typically broken. Research on designing text to disabuse students of scientific misconceptions points to text features that authors could use to encourage readers to read persuasion mindfully.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P.
(1969). An introduction to logic: The criticism of arguments. New York: Shocken.
2.
Anderson, C. A.
, Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
3.
Astington, J. W.
, & Gopnik, A. (1988). Knowing you've changed your mind: Children's understanding of representational change. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 193-206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Beck, I. L.
, & Dole, J. A. (1992). Reading and thinking with history and science text. In C. Collins & J. N. Mangieri (Eds.), Building the quality of thinking in and out of our schools in the twenty-first century (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Bereiter, C.
(1991). Implications of connectionism for thinking about rules. Educational Researcher, 20, 10-16.
6.
Brooks, C.
, & Warren, R. P. (1972). Modern rhetoric (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
7.
Brown, J.
, & Langer, E. (1990). Mindfulness and intelligence: A comparison. Educational Psychologist, 25, 305-335.
8.
Calfee, R. C.
, & Chambliss, M. J. (1987). The structural design features of large texts. Educational Psychologist, 22, 357-378.
9.
Chambliss, M. J.
(1994). Why do readers fail to change their beliefs after reading persuasive text? In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 75-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Chambliss, M. J.
(1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778-807.
11.
Cooper, L.
(1932). The rhetoric of Aristotle. New York: Appleton-Century.
12.
Corbett, E.P.J.
(1965). Classical rhetoric of the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Crismore, A.
, Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 8, 39-71.
14.
Dole, J. A.
, & Sinatra, G. M. (1994). Social psychology research on beliefs and attitudes: Implications for research on learning from text. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 245-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Durst, R.
, Laine, C., Schultz, L., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing texts: The persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication, 7, 232-255.
16.
Fiske, S.T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Flavell, J. H.
(1988). The development of children's knowledge about the mind: From cognitive connections to mental representations. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 244-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Garner, R.
(1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
Garner, R.
(1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529.
20.
Garner, R.
, & Alexander, P. A. (1991, April). Skill, will, and thrill: Factors in adults' text comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
21.
Garner, R.
, Gillingham, M. G., & White, J. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.
22.
Gilbert, D. T.
(1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
23.
Hairston, M. C.
(1992). Successful writing (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.
24.
Kinneavy, J. L.
(1969). The basic aims of discourse. College Composition and Communication, 20, 297-304.
25.
Kinneavy, J. L.
, & Eskin, C. R. (1994). Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric. Written Communication, 11, 131-142.
26.
Kuhn, D.
(1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
27.
Lefford, A.
(1946). The influence of emotional subject matter on logical reasoning. Journal of General Psychology, 34, 127-151.
28.
Lord, C. G.
, Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
29.
Nickerson, R. S.
(1991). Modes and models of informal reasoning: A commentary. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 291-309). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Nisbett, R. E.
, Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Fong, G. T. (1982). Improving inductive inference. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 445-459). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Pollard, P.
(1982). Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability. Cognition, 12, 65-96.
32.
Ramage, J. D.
, & Bean, J. C. (1995). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Ross, L.
(1981). The “intuitive scientist” formulation and its developmental implications. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development (pp. 1-42). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Ross, L.
(1987). The problem of construal in social inference and social psychology. In N. E. Grunberg, R. E. Nisbett, J. Rodin, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), A distinctive approach to psychological research: The influence of Stanley Schachter (pp. 118-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Rumelhart, D.E.
(1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Schauble, L.
(1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31-57.
37.
Schommer, M.
(1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
38.
Spivey, N. N.
(1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7, 256-287.
39.
Stein, N. L.
, & Miller, C. A. (1991). I win—You lose: The development of argumentative thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 265-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Toulmin, S. E.
(1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Tversky, A.
, & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Ullmann, O.
(1991, June 2). War in the Gulf: Victory for the status quo?San Jose Mercury News, pp. 1A, 11A.
43.
Vallone, R. P.
, Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
44.
van Dijk, T. A.
, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Warnick, B.
, & Inch, E. S. (1989). Critical thinking and communication. New York: Macmillan.
46.
Williams, J. M.
(1991). Rhetoric and informal reasoning: Disentangling some confounded effects in good reasoning and good writing. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 225-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
