The evolution of technical communication conventions in America is more anthropologically complex than the traditional linkage to the scientific plain-style tradition suggests. Analysis of leading ideas in early 20th-century engineering writing textbooks and other primary sources demonstrates that disciplinary discourse conventions develop from an intricate nexus of human motivations, beliefs, and social activity. This article explores currents in American social and intellectual history that explain this complex, sophisticated view of language, which combines a rhetorically sensitive formalism with the ideas of professional literacy and cultural reading to facilitate communication with various audiences and to reinforce the status and dignity of the emerging profession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
*Indicates a Sample Textbook
2.
*Agg, T. R., & Foster, W. L. (1935). The preparation of engineering reports. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Akmajian, A.
, Demers, R., & Harnish, R. (1980). Overcoming inadequacies in the “message-model” of linguistic communication. Communication and Cognition, 13, 317-336.
4.
Allbutt, T. C.
(1923). Notes on the composition of scientific papers. London: Macmillan.
5.
Allen, F. S.
(1919). The hyphen in engineering literature. Engineering Education, 10, 379-391.
6.
Allen, J.
(1989). The question isn't “could” but “should”: The case against using fiction in the introductory technical writing class. The Technical Writing Teacher, 16, 210-219.
7.
Alseth, H. J.
(1925). What engineering colleges are doing to encourage reading. Engineering Education, 16, 503-509.
8.
Andrews, D. C.
, & Andrews, W. D. (1981). Nineteenth century American house pattern books: A rhetorical analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th International Technical Communication Conference (pp. E-14). Washington, DC: Society for Technical Communication.
9.
Anthony, G. C.
(1914). Unity in education. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 5(1), 32-44.
10.
Atkinson, R. L.
, Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., & Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Introduction to psychology (9th ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11.
*Aydelotte, F. (1917). English and engineering: A volume of essays for English classes in engineering schools. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
*Baker, R. P. (1924). The preparation of reports: Engineering, scientific, administrative. New York: Ronald Press.
13.
Baker, R. P.
(1932). Problems of administering English work in engineering colleges. Engineering Education, 23, 282-291.
14.
Baker, R. P.
, & Howell, A. C. (1938). The preparation of reports (Rev. ed.). New York: Ronald Press.
15.
Barber, C.
(1976). Early modern English. London: André Deutsch.
16.
Baresich, M. J.
(1980). The relativity of communication: Albert Einstein as technical writer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 10, 125-132.
17.
Bates, R. S.
(1965). Scientific societies in the United States (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Batschelet, M. W.
(1988). Plain style and scientific style: The influence of the Puritan plain style sermon on early American science writers. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18, 287-296.
19.
Batschelet, M. W.
(1990). Early American scientific and technical literature: An annotated bibliography of books, pamphlets, and broadsides. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
20.
Berlin, J. A.
(1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
Birk, W. O.
(1921). A course in engineering literature. Engineering Education, 12, 298-301.
22.
Boas, G.
(1969). The history of ideas: An introduction. New York: Scribner.
23.
Breithaupt, J.
(1991). U. S. Grant, writing to meet the emergency. Technical Communication, 38, 150-151.
24.
Brockmann, R. J.
(1983). Bibliography of articles on the history of technical writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 13, 155-165.
25.
Brockmann, R. J.
(1988). Does Clio have a place in technical writing? Considering patents in a history of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18, 297-304.
26.
Brogan, J. A.
(1965). A lesson from Benjamin Franklin, America's first great technical writer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Writing, 8(1), 36.
27.
Brooks, F. A.
(1934). Technical system of dimensional units. Engineering Education, 25, 240-243.
28.
Cmiel, K.
(1990). Democratic eloquence: The fight over popular speech in nineteenth-century America. New York: William Morrow. Rpt. by University of California Press.
29.
Connaughton, M.
(1981). Technical writing in America: A historical perspective. In J. C. Mathes & T. E. Pinelli (Eds.), Technical writings: Past, present, and future (pp. 31-42). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
30.
Connor, J. J.
(1987). Technical writing kits: Their origins, functions and context. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17, 231-242.
31.
Connor, J. J.
(1988, September). Research in business communication: A plea for originality and relevance in pedagogic examples. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 51(3), 21-24.
32.
Connor, J. J.
(1991). History and the study of technical communication in Canada and the United States. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34(1), 36.
33.
Connor, J. J.
(1993). Medical text and historical context: Research issues and methods in history and technical communication. Journal on Technical Writing and Communication, 23, 211-232.
34.
Connor, J.T.H.
, & Connor, J. J. (1992). Commentary on rhetorical analysis of William Harvey's De motu cordis (1628). Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 22, 195-201.
35.
Connors, R. J.
(1982). The rise of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12, 329-352.
36.
Cooley, M. E.
(1922). Civilization and the engineer. Engineering Education, 13, 10-13.
37.
Crystal, D.
(1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
Curti, M.
(1964). The growth of American thought (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
39.
Daniels, G. H.
(1971). Science in American society: A social history. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
40.
Earle, S. [C.]
. (1911a). English in engineering schools. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 2, 383-389.
41.
Earle, S. C.
(1911b). English in the engineering school at Tufts College. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 2, 29-43.
42.
*Earle, S. C. (1911c). The theory and practice of technical writing. New York: Macmillan.
43.
Earle, S. C.
(1914). Bettering the use of English. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 5(6), 39-41.
44.
Earle, S. C.
(1916a). Institutional instruction in English. Engineering Education, 7, 305-326.
45.
Earle, S. C.
(1916b). What if it were all Greek to the engineer?Engineering Education, 7, 246-261.
46.
Emig, J.
(1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
47.
Emig, J.
(1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 34-40.
48.
Faig, J. T.
(1917). Symbols for mechanics and hydraulics. Engineering Education, 8, 148-156.
49.
Ferguson, R. W.
(1980). “Fear God and take your own part!”: Ethical imperatives and technical writing—Some turn-of-the-century examples. In Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Communication Conference (pp. W 195-W 197). Washington, DC: Society for Technical Communication.
50.
*Fitting, R. U. (1924). Report writing. New York: Ronald Press.
51.
Fletcher, R.
(1917). A curious misnomer in mechanics: Anent the “conical pendulum” and “centrifugal force.”Engineering Education, 8, 403-407.
52.
Flinn, A. D.
(1929). English for consulting engineers. Engineering Education, 20, 205-207.
53.
Flower, L.
(1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-37.
54.
Franklin, W. S.
, & MacNutt, B. (1917). The engineers' system of mechanical units. Engineering Education, 8, 506-510.
55.
Franklin, W. S.
, & MacNutt, B. (1920). The simple facts concerning units in mechanics. How can agreement be reached?Engineering Education, 11, 67-71.
56.
*Frost, H. (1911). Good engineering literature: What to read and how to write with suggestive information on allied topics. Chicago: Author. Distributed by Chicago Book Company.
57.
Fulkerson, R.
(1990). Composition theory in the eighties: Axiological consensus and paradigmatic diversity. College Composition and Communication, 41, 409-429.
58.
*Gaum, C. G., & Graves, H. F. (1929). Report writing. New York: Prentice-Hall.
59.
Gerson, S.
(1988). Commentary: Humanism in technical/business communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18, 345-353.
60.
Grayson, L. P.
(1977). A brief history of engineering education in the United States. Engineering Education, 68, 246-264.
61.
Greene, J. C.
(1957/58). Objectives and methods in intellectual history. Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 44, 58-74.
62.
Grego, R. C.
(1987). Science, late nineteenth-century rhetoric, and the beginnings of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17, 63-78.
63.
Gresham, S. L.
(1977a). Benjamin Franklin's contributions to the development of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 7, 5-13.
64.
Gresham, S. L.
(1977b). Harvesting the past: The legacy of scientific and technical writing in America. In Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Communication Conference (pp. 306-308). Washington, DC: Society for Technical Communication.
65.
Gresham, S. L.
(1978). When technical communicators face the past. Technical Communication, 25(3), 8-9, 11.
66.
Gresham, S. L.
(1979). George Washington Carver and the art of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 9, 217-225.
67.
Gresham, S. L.
(1981). From Aristotle to Einstein: Scientific literature and the teaching of technical writing. In D. W. Stevenson (Ed.), Courses, components, and exercises in technical communication (pp. 87-93). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
68.
Grisham, R.
, & Kittredge, R. (Eds.). (1986). Analyzing language in restricted domains: Sublanguage description and processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69.
Haber, S.
(1991). The quest for authority and honor in the American professions, 1750-1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
Hagge, J.
(1987). The process religion and business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 24(1), 89-120.
71.
Hagge, J.
(1989a). The spurious paternity of business communication principles. Journal of Business Communication, 26(1), 33-55.
72.
Hagge, J.
(1989b). Ties that bind: Ancient epistolography and modern business communication. Journal of Advanced Composition, 9, 26-44.
73.
Hagge, J.
(1990). The first technical writer in English: A challenge to the hegemony of Chaucer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20, 269-289.
74.
Hagge, J.
(1994a, June 4). Justifications for formal conventions in science and technical writing: A historical survey of early textbooks and professional style manuals. Paper delivered as Invited Speaker, Canadian Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, Learned Societies Conference/Congrés des sociétés savantes, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
75.
Hagge, J.
(1994b). The value of formal conventions in disciplinary writing: An axiological analysis of professional style manuals. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8, 408-461.
76.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
77.
Harbarger, S. A.
(1918). Some unconsidered factors. Engineering Education, 9, 278-281.
78.
*Harbarger, S. A. (1923). English for engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79.
Hargis, C. C., Jr.
(1962, January). America's first great technical writer. STWP Review, 9, 12-13.
80.
Harmon, J. E.
(1987). The literature of enlightenment: Technical periodicals and proceedings in the 17th and 18th centuries. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17, 397-405.
81.
Harmon, J. E.
(1989a). Development of the modern technical article. Technical Communication, 36, 33-38.
82.
Harmon, J. E.
(1989b). The structure of scientific and engineering papers: A historical perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32, 132-138.
83.
Harris, E.
(1982). In defense of the liberal-arts approach to technical writing. College English, 44, 628-636.
84.
Hays, S. P.
(1957). The response to industrialism 1885-1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Hofstadter, R.
(1955). The age of reform. New York: Vintage.
86.
Hofstadter, R.
(1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Rpt. by Vintage, Random House.
87.
Howell, A. C.
(1927). English for engineers at the University of North Carolina. Engineering Education, 18, 621-628.
88.
Howell, A. C.
(1928). The practical impossibilities of “an unpractical education.”Engineering Education, 19, 972-978.
89.
*Howell, A. C. (1930). A handbook of English in engineering usage. New York: Wiley.
90.
Howell, A. C.
(1934). Teaching literature to engineers. Engineering Education, 25, 639-644.
91.
Howell, A. C.
(1935). Short bibliography of reports useful in teaching elements of report writing. Engineering Education, 26, 340-344.
92.
Hudson, R. A.
(1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
93.
Hymes, D.
(1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
94.
Kalmbach, J.
(1988). Reconceiving the page: A short history of desktop publishing. Technical Communication, 35, 277-281.
95.
Kilgore, D.
(1981). Moby-Dick: A whale of a handbook for technical writing teachers. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 11, 209-216.
96.
Labov, W.
(1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
97.
Layton, E. T.
(1971). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press.
98.
Lerner, M.
(1957). America as a civilization. New York: Simon & Schuster.
99.
Lewis, W. K.
(1937). Development of the younger teacher. Engineering Education, 28, 354-359.
100.
Lipson, C.
(1985). Francis Bacon and plain scientific prose: A reexamination. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 15, 143-155.
101.
Lipson, C.
(1988). A social view of technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(1), 7-20.
102.
Lovejoy, A. O.
(1936). The study of the history of ideas. In A. O. Lovejoy (Ed.), The great chain of being (pp. 3-23). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103.
Low, F. R.
(1922). He who reads may run. Power, 55, 565.
104.
Malcolm, A.
(1991). Changes in technical communication during the last 130 years. In Proceedings of the 38th International Technical Communication Conference (pp. WE 3-WE 6). Washington, DC: Society for Technical Communication.
105.
Mann, C. R.
(1918). A study of engineering education (Bulletin no. 11). New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
106.
Marcus, A. I.
, & Segal, H. P. (1989). Technology in America: A brief history. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
107.
May, H. F.
(1964). The end of innocence: A study of the first years of our own time 1912-1917. Chicago: Quadrangle.
108.
McDonald, P. B.
(1919). A professor's English. Engineering Education, 10, 140-142.
109.
*McDonald, P. B. (1929). English and science. New York: Van Nostrand.
110.
McGivern, J. G.
(1960). The first hundred years of engineering education in the United States (1807-1907). Spokane, WA: Gonzaga University Press.
111.
Merritt, R. H.
(1969). Engineering in American society 1850-1875. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
112.
Miller, C.
(1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610-617.
113.
Miller, G. A.
(1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
114.
Moran, M. G.
(1985). The history of technical and scientific writing. In M. G. Moran & D. Journet (Eds.), Research in technical communication: A bibliographic sourcebook (pp. 25-38). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
115.
Morison, G. S.
(1903). The new epoch: As developed by the manufacture of power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
116.
Moss, S. A.
(1931). Symbols standardization. Engineering Education, 22, 371-378.
117.
Naether, C.
(1935). Teaching the course in technical writing. Engineering Education, 26, 647-652.
118.
*Naether, C. A., & Richardson, G. F. (1930). A course in English for engineers: Vol. 1. The engineer's speaking and writing in general. Boston: Ginn.
119.
Nash, P. C.
(1936). Breadth in engineering curricula. Engineering Education, 27, 304-309.
120.
Nichols, M.
(1991). Thomas Jefferson's notes. Technical Communication, 38, 149-150.
121.
Noble, D.
(1970). The progressive mind 1890-1917. Chicago: Rand McNally.
122.
Oleson, A.
, & Voss, J. (Eds.). (1979). The organization of knowledge in modern America, 1860-1920. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
123.
Ostrander, G.
(1970). American civilization in the first machine age: 1890-1940. New York: Harper & Row.
124.
Park, C. W.
(1913). Cooperation in the teaching of English to engineering students. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 4(8), 49-50.
125.
Park, C. W.
(1914). Cooperative courses in English for engineering students. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 5(9), 30-37.
126.
Park, C. W.
(1915). Some notes on the writing of compound technical terms. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 6, 195-205.
127.
*Park, C. W. (1926). English applied in technical writing. New York: F. S. Crofts.
128.
Park, C. W.
(1935). A glance toward culture. Engineering Education, 26, 207-213.
129.
Perl, S.
(1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
130.
Pianko, S.
(1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshman writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5-22.
131.
Poulsen, M. R.
(1990). Hemingway's style and the technical communicator. Technical Communication, 37, 341.
132.
Price, A.
(1988). David Bushnell: An inventor describes his invention. Technical Communication, 35, 344.
133.
Rae, J.
(1979). The application of science to industry. In A. Oleson & J. Voss (Eds.), The organization of knowledge in modern America, 1860-1920 (pp. 249-268). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
134.
Ralston, J. C.
(1913). Parallelograms of engineering culture. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 4(1), 28-35.
135.
Ralston, J. C.
(1914). Parallelograms of engineering education. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 5(5), 19-27.
136.
Reddy, M.
(1979). The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). New York: Cambridge University Press.
137.
Rees, R. I.
(1932). The young engineer and his English. Engineering Education, 23, 479-490.
138.
*Richardson, H. C., Becklund, L. N., Guthrie, L. O., & Haga, C. I. (1934). Practical forms in exposition: A manual designed to assist technical students with papers, letters, reports, and reading. New York: Macmillan.
139.
*Rickard, T. A. (1908). A guide to technical writing. San Francisco: Mining and Scientific Press.
140.
*Rickard, T. A. (1920). Technical writing. New York: Wiley.
141.
Rickard, T. A.
(1931). Technical writing (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
142.
Rivers, W. E.
(1994). Studies in the history of business and technical writing: A bibliographic essay. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8, 6-57.
143.
Runquist, M.
(1992). The rhetoric of geology: Ethos in the writing of North American geologists, 1823-1988. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 22, 387-404.
144.
Russell, D.
(1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870-1990: A curricular history. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
145.
Rutter, R.
(1991). History, rhetoric, and humanism: Toward a more comprehensive definition of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21, 133-153.
146.
Sauer, B. A.
(1993). Revisioning sixteenth century solutions to twentieth century problems in Herbert Hoover's translation of Agricola's De Re Metallica. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23, 269-286.
147.
Schmelzer, R. W.
(1977). The first textbook on technical writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 7, 51-54.
148.
Schulman, J.
(1963). Cotton Mather, America's first technical writer. STWP Review, 10, 20-22.
149.
*Scott, J. H. (1928). Engineering English. New York: Wiley.
150.
Selzer, J.
(1981). The composing processes of an engineer. College Composition and Communication, 34, 178-187.
151.
Shirk, H. N.
(1988). Technical writing's roots in computer science: The evolution from technician to technical writer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18, 305-323.
152.
*Solberg, V. (1929). Expository descriptions: A textbook for courses in technical writing. New York: Ronald Press.
153.
Sommers, N.
(1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.
154.
Stetson, G. A.
(1929). What should college courses in English contribute to the graduate in his future work?Engineering Education, 20, 678-681.
155.
Stetson, G. A.
(1932). The art of technical writing. Engineering Education, 23, 491-498.
156.
Sutherland, H.
(1933). Humanities in engineering education. Engineering Education, 24, 540-556.
157.
*Sypherd, W. O. (1913). A handbook of English for engineers. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
158.
Tebeaux, E.
(1981). Franklin's Autobiography—Important lessons in tone, syntax, and persona. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 11, 341-349.
159.
Tebeaux, E.
, & Killingsworth, M. J. (1992). Expanding and redirecting historical research in technical writing: In search of our past. Technical Communication Quarterly, 35, 196-207.
160.
Telleen, J. M.
(1913). Good reading for engineers. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 4(5), 52-55.
161.
Telleen, J. M.
(1915). The development of engineering words. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 6, 325-331.
162.
Trelease, S. F.
, & Yule, E. S. (1925). Preparation of scientific and technical papers. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
163.
Veysey, L. R.
(1965). The emergence of the American university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
164.
Waddell, J.A.L.
(1916). Technical book writing. Part 1. Engineering Education, 7, 151-171.
165.
Waddell, J.A.L.
, & Harrington, J.L. (1912). Addresses to engineering students. Kansas City, MO: Waddell & Harrington.
166.
Watt, H. A.
(1916). The English department and the professional schools. Engineering Education, 7, 73-89.
167.
*Watt, H. A. (1917a). The composition of technical papers (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
168.
Watt, H. A.
(1917b). The Wisconsin course in the composition of technical papers. Engineering Education, 8, 119-126.
169.
*Watt, H. A., & McDonald, P.B. (1925). The composition of technical papers (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
170.
Weiss, E. H.
(1986). Commentary: What technical writers must learn from the history of programming. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 16, 257-265.
171.
Wickenden, W. E.
(1930). Report of the investigation of engineering education 1923-1929. Lancaster, PA: Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education.
172.
Wiebe, R. H.
(1962). Businessmen and reform: A study of the Progressive movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
173.
Wright, D. M.
(1912). The revision and standardization of English technical terms. Bulletin of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, 3, 672-677.
174.
Zappen, J. P.
(1987a). Historical studies in the rhetoric of science and technology. Technical Writing Teacher, 14, 285-298.
175.
Zappen, J. P.
(1987b). Rhetoric and technical communication: An argument for historical and political pluralism. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1(2), 29-44.
