Composition studies, as a field, has always depended on theoretical constructs and empirical methods from other disciplines. This article looks at interdisciplinary work in the area of composition and computer-mediated communication (CMC). The work on writing and electronic networks has drawn from early experimental studies of CMC in social psychology, the premises of which are at odds with current thinking in both composition studies and social psychology. In recent years, social psychological research on CMC has witnessed changes similar to those in composition: a rethinking of positivistic frameworks and a move to emphasize social constructs. This article reviews the work of four groups conducting social psychological research on CMC. It traces the movement away from theoretical frameworks based in positivism toward those grounded in social constructionism. It concludes by advocating a dialogic relationship between research in computers and composition studies and social psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adrianson, L.
, & Hjelmquist, E. (1988). Users' experiences of COM—A computer-mediated communication system. Behaviour and Information Technology, 7, 79-99.
2.
Adrianson, L.
, & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 281-296.
3.
Adrianson, L.
, & Hjelmquist, E. (1993). Communication and memory of texts in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 121-135.
4.
Barker, T.
, & Kemp, F. O. (1990). Network theory: A postmodern pedagogy for the writing classroom. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community (pp. 1-27). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
5.
Bartholomae, D.
(1993). “I'm talking about Allen Bloom”: Writing on the network. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Networked-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 237-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Beach, R.
(1992). Experimental and descriptive research methods in composition. In G. Kirsch & P. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 217-243). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
7.
Bizzell, P.
(1986). Composing processes: An overview. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing (pp. 49-70). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bruce, B. C.
, & Peyton, J. K. (1993). A situated evaluation of ENFI. In B. C. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Networked-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 33-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bruce, B. C.
, Peyton, J. K., & Batson, T. (1993). Networked-based classrooms: Promises and realities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cooper, M.
, & Selfe, C. L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
11.
Dubrovsky, V. J.
, Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
12.
Eldred, J. M.
(1991). Pedagogy in the computer-networked classroom. Computers and Composition, 8, 47-61.
13.
Faigley, L.
(1990). Subverting the electronic network: Teaching writing using networked computers. In D. Daiker & M. Morenberg (Eds.), The writing teacher as researcher: Essays in the theory and practice of class-based research (pp. 290-311). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
14.
Faigley, L.
(1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
George, E. L.
(1990). Taking women professors seriously: Female authority in the computerized classroom [Special issue]. Computers and Composition, 7, 45-52.
16.
Gross, A. G.
(1994). Review: Theory, method, practice. College English, 56, 828-840.
17.
Hartman, K.
, Neuwirth, C., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write. Written Communication, 8, 57-78.
18.
Hawisher, G. E.
(1992). Electronic meetings of the minds: Research, electronic conferences, and composition studies. In G. E. Hawisher and P. LeBlanc (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age (pp. 81-101). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
19.
Hawisher, G. E.
, & Moran, C. (1993). Electronic mail and the writing instructor. College English, 55, 627-643.
20.
Hawisher, G. E.
, & Selfe, C. L. (1992). Voices in college classrooms: The dynamics of electronic discussion. The Quarterly of the National Writing Project & the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 14, 24-28, 32.
21.
Hawisher, G. E.
, & Sullivan, P. A. (in press). Women on the networks: Searching for presence in online discussions. In S. Jarratt & L. Worsham (Eds.), Feminism and composition. New York: Modern Language Association.
22.
Herrington, A.
(1989). The first twenty years of Research in the Teaching of English and the growth of a research community in composition studies. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 117-138.
23.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 133-183). New York: Praeger.
24.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Johnson, K., Aronovitch, C., & Turoff, M. (1980). Face-to-face vs. computerized conferences: A controlled experiment: Vol. 1. Findings (Research Rep. No. 12). Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology.
25.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making: III. Disinhibition, de-individuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232.
26.
Howard, T. (1992). A rhetoric of electronic communities. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
27.
Huff, C.
, Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational commitment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1371-1391.
28.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
29.
Kiesler, S.
, Zubrow, D., Moses, A., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
30.
Kirsch, G.
(1992). Methodological pluralism: Epistemological issues. In G. Kirsch & P. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 247-269). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
31.
Kling, R.
(1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12, 61-113.
32.
Kremers, M.
(1988). Adams Sherman Hill meets ENFI: An inquiry and a retrospective. Computers and Composition, 5, 69-77.
33.
Langston, M. D.
, & Batson, T. W. (1990). The social shifts invited by working collaboratively on computer networks: The ENFI project. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community (pp. 150-159). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
34.
Lauer, J. M.
(1984). Composition studies: Dappled discipline. Rhetoric Review, 3, 20-29.
35.
Lauer, J. M.
(1993). Rhetoric and composition studies: A multimodal discipline. In T. Enos & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Defining the new rhetorics (pp. 44-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Lea, M.
(1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 153-172.
37.
Lea, M.
, O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). New York: Wheatsheaf.
38.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
39.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
40.
Mabrito, M.
(1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of high-and low-apprehensive writers. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.
41.
Matheson, K.
(1991). Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137-145.
42.
Matheson, K.
(1992). Women and computer technology: Communicating for herself. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 66-88). New York: Wheatsheaf.
43.
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233.
44.
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication. Social Behaviour, 4, 99-111.
45.
McGuire, T. W.
, Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion of effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
46.
Moran, C.
(1991). We write, but do we read?Computers and Composition, 8, 51-61.
47.
Romano, S.
(1993). The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Which yardstick?Computers and Composition, 10, 5-28.
48.
Selfe, C. L.
, & Meyer P. R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-198.
49.
Siegel, J.
, Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
50.
Spears, R.
, & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). New York: Wheatsheaf.
51.
Spears, R.
, Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
52.
Spitzer, M.
(1986). Writing style in computer conferences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36, 19-22.
53.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organization communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
54.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
Takayoshi, P.
(1994). Building new networks from the old: Women's experiences with electronic communications. Computers and Composition, 11, 21-35.
56.
Thompson, M.
(1994). Review of Gender influences: Reading student texts and Women writing the academy: Audience, authority, and transformation. Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, 600-604.
57.
Trimbur, J.
(1989). Consensus and difference in collaborative learning. College English, 51, 602-616.
