The authors assessed writing attitudes and epistemologies of 117 first-year and 329 upper-level undergraduates. Attitude scales assessed enjoyment of writing, self-ratings of writing ability, and belief in writing as learnable. Epistemological scales measured absolutism (belief in knowledge as determinably true or false), relativism (belief in the indeterminacy of all claims), and evaluativism (belief that truth can be approximated). Absolutism correlated negatively with writing grades and verbal aptitude, whereas evaluativism exhibited a weak positive correlation with both. Students with higher evaluativism tended to enjoy writing more and to assess themselves as good writers. Upper-level students were less absolutist and marginally more evaluativist than first-year students. Differences in attitudes and epistemologies emerged between men and women and among upper-level students in four disciplinary groups. The authors sketch some implications for writing pedagogy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A.
(1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
2.
Charney, D.
, Rayman, J., & Ferreira-Buckley, L. (1992). How writing quality influences readers, judgments of résumés in business and engineering. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 38-74.
3.
Daly, J.
, & Miller, M. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242-249.
4.
Ehrlich, M. F.
, Kurtz-Costes, B., & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 365-381.
5.
Fogarty, D.
(1959). Roots for a new rhetoric. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.
6.
Graham, S.
, Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237-249.
7.
Hartman, K.
, Neuwirth, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.
8.
Hays, J.
, & Brandt, K. (1992). Socio-cognitive development and student performance on audience-centered argumentative writing. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 202-229). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9.
Hays, J.
, Brandt, K., & Chantry, K. (1988). The impact of friendly and hostile audiences on the argumentative writing of high school and college students. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 391-416.
10.
Heyman, G. D.
, & Dweck, C. S. (1992). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Their relation and their role in adaptive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 231-247.
11.
Hillocks, G., Jr.
(1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
12.
Holland, J. L.
(1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Kuhn, D.
, Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14.
Martin, J. E.
, Silva, D. G., Newman, J. H., & Thayer, J. F. (1994). An investigation into the structure of epistemological style. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 617-629.
15.
Nelson, J.
(1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 362-396.
16.
Nelson, J.
(1993). The library revisited: Exploring students' research processes. In A. Penrose & B. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 102-122). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Newman, J. H. (1984). Influences of adult intellectual development and attitude compatibility in dyadic verbal interaction. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
18.
Newman, J. H. (1993). A structural investigation of intellectual development and epistemological style in young adults (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2786B.
19.
Newman, J. H.
, & Martin, J. E. (1989, June). Cognitive development and collegiate conversation. Poster session at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Alexandria, VA.
20.
Pajares, F.
, & Johnson, M. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 313-331.
21.
Palmquist, M.
, & Young, R. (1992). The notion of giftedness and student expectations about writing. Written Communication, 9, 137-168.
22.
Penrose, A.
, & Sitko, B. (Eds.). (1993). Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Perelman, C.
, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
Perry, W. G., Jr.
(1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development during the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25.
Pintrich, P.
, Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
26.
Schommer, M.
(1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
27.
Shell, D.
, Murphy, C., & Bruning, R. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91-100.
28.
Super, D. E.
(1957). The psychology of careers. New York: Harper.
29.
Young, R.
(1980). Arts, crafts, gifts and knacks: Some disharmonies in the new rhetoric. Visible Language, 14, 341-350.
30.
Zimmerman, B.
, & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.
