Social theories of language (e.g., Vygotsky and Bakhtin) implicate instruction that promotes spoken interaction during the writing process. Such interaction is said to make explicit for students the dialogic relationship between writers and readers that underlies written text. This case study of a “prewriting” class discussion and student writing in a secondary English class suggests that, more than establishing a relationship with readers, students talk and writing invoke a complex of roles that reflect their relationships with one another, the outside world, and their texts. Speaking and writing contexts shape the different roles that students take. The setting of the study is an inner-city classroom in which students' lives bear critical connections to the outside world; such classrooms may be particularly valuable sites for studying students as complex role players in the process of learning to write. In offering a theory of roles and relationships, the study complicates current thinking about how classroom discourse in these and other settings is linked to writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakhtin, M.
(1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
Banton, M.
(1985). Role. In A. Kuper & J. Kuper (Eds.), Social science encyclopedia (p. 716). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3.
Biddle, B.
(1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Brooke, R.
(1987). Underlife and writing instruction. College Composition and Communication, 38, 141-153.
5.
Cazden, C.
(1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6.
Chafe, W.
(1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Christie, F.
(1989). Language education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Corsaro, W.
(1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early school years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Daiute, C.
, Hartup, W., Sholl, W., & Zajac, R. (1993, March). Peer collaboration and written language development: A study of friends and acquaintances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
10.
Dyson, A. H.
(1992). The case of the singing scientist: A performance perspective on the “stages” of school literacy. Written Communication, 9, 3-47.
11.
Erickson, F.
(1984). Rhetoric, anecdote, and rhapsody: Coherence strategies in a conversation among Black American adolescents. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Cohesion in spoken and written discourse (pp. 81-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
13.
Freedman, S. W.
(1992). Outside-in and inside-out: Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 71-107.
14.
Freedman, S. W.
(in press). Exchanging writing, exchanging cultures: Learning to write in U.S. and British schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Goffman, E.
(1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
16.
Gumperz, J.
(1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1978). Language as social semiotic. Baltimore: University Park.
18.
Halliday, M.A.K.
, & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
19.
Heath, S. B.
(1982). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 91-117). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Herrington, A.
(1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
21.
Herrington, A.
(1992). Composing one's self in a discipline: Students' and teachers' negotiations. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing rhetorical education (pp. 91-115). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
22.
Higgins, L.
, Flower, L., & Petraglia, J. (1992). Planning text together: The role of critical reflections in student collaboration. Written Communication, 9, 48-84.
23.
Hull, G.
, Rose, M., Fraser, K. L., & Castellano, M. (1991). Remediation as social construct: Perspectives from an analysis of classroom discourse. College Composition and Communication, 42, 299-329.
24.
Labov, W.
(1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
McCarthy, L. P.
(1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.
26.
Mehan, H.
(1979a). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Mehan, H.
(1979b). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 28, 285-294.
28.
Michaels, S.
(1986). Narrative presentations: An oral preparation for literacy with first graders. In J. Cook-Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 94-116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Mitchell-Kernan, C.
(1973). Signifying. In A. Dundes (Ed.), Mother wit from the laughing barrel: Readings in the interpretation of Afro-American folklore (pp. 310-328). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Nystrand, M.
(1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31.
Nystrand, M.
, & Wiemelt, J. (1993, November). On the dialogic nature of discourse and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Pittsburgh, PA.
32.
Perlman, L.
(1986). The context of classroom writing. College English, 48, 471-479.
33.
Smitherman, G.
(1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
34.
Sperling, M.
(1990). I want to talk to each of you: Collaboration and the teacher-student writing conference. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 279-321.
35.
Sperling, M.
(1993, April). Layering reader-writer perspectives in the teacher-student writing conference. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
36.
Sperling, M.
(1994a). Constructing the perspective of teacher-as-reader: A framework for studying response to student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 175-207.
37.
Sperling, M.
(1994b). Speaking of writing: When teacher and student collaborate. In S. Reagan, T. Fox, & D. Bleich (Eds.), Writing with: New directions in collaborative teaching, learning, and research (pp. 175-203). New York: SUNY Press.
38.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Walvoord, B. G.
, & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
40.
Witte, S.
(1983). Topical structure and writing quality: Some possible text-based explanations of readers' judgments of students' writing. Visible Language, 17, 177-205.
