This study proceeds from the assumption that computers do not function as independent variables in classrooms, but rather as part of a complex network of social and pedagogical interactions. It examines the integration of computers into the writing practices of a remedial English class in an urban high school. Computers and word processors were introduced midway into the school year. The class was observed and recorded daily throughout the academic year, and all written work was collected. Six students were selected for in-depth focus as they carried out writing tasks. Analysis focuses on how classroom writing practices were structured and carried out and how students participated in writing tasks before and after the computers arrived. Although many changes accompanied the use of computers, the study concludes that the teacher's structuring of writing instruction had the greatest impact on both student writing and the ways computers entered into that writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bridwell, L.
, Sirc, G., & Brooke, R. (1985). Revising and computing: Case studies of student writers. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response (pp. 172-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Clark, C.M.
, & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3.
Cochran-Smith, M.
(1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155.
4.
Cole, M.
, & Griffin, P. (1987). Contextual factors in education: Improving science and mathematics education for minorities and women. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
5.
Collier, R.
(1983). The word processor and revision strategies. College Composition and Communication, 34, 149-155.
6.
D'Agostino, K.
, & Varone, S. (1991). Interacting with basic writers in the computer classroom. Computers and Composition, August.
7.
Daiute, C.
(1983). The computer as stylus and audience. College Composition and Communication, 34, 134-145.
8.
Daiute, C.
(1985). Do writers talk to themselves? In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response (pp. 133-159). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Daiute, C.
(1986a, April). Let's brighten it up a bit: The talk of young coauthors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
10.
Daiute, C.
(1986b). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159.
11.
Dickinson, D.
(1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a first-second grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 357-378.
12.
Dickson, W.
, & Vereen, M. (1983). Two students at one microcomputer. Theory Into Practice, 22, 296-300.
13.
Freedman, S.
, Dyson, A., Flower, L., & Chafe, W. (1987). Research in writing: Past, present, and future (Technical Report No. 1). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing.
14.
Gerrard, L.
(1989). Computers and basic writers: A critical view. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 94-108). New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Gomez, M.
(1991). The equitable teaching of composition with computers: A case for change. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s (pp. 318-335). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16.
Green, J.
(1984). Computers and writing: An interview with Donald Graves. Classroom Computer Learning, March 21-23.
17.
Harris, J.
(1985). Student writers and word processing: A preliminary evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36, 323-330.
18.
Hawisher, G.
(1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 44-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Hawisher, G.
, & Fortune, R. (1989). Word processing and the basic writer. Collegiate Microcomputer, 7, 275-284.
20.
Hawisher, G.
, & Selfe, C. (1991). Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
21.
Hawkins, J.
, & Sheingold, K. (1986). The beginning of a story: Computers and the organization of learning in classrooms. In J. Albertson & L. Cunningham (Eds.), Micro-computers and education: 85th yearbook of National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 40-57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Heap, J.
(1986, April). Collaborative practices during computer writing in a first grade classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
23.
Heath, S.
(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Herrmann, A.
(1987). An ethnographic study of a high school writing class using computers: Marginal, technically proficient, and productive learners. In L. Gerrard, (Ed.), Writing at century's end: Essays on computer-assisted composition (pp. 79-91). New York: Random House.
25.
Hull, G.
(1988). Literacy, technology, and the underprepared: Notes toward a frame-work for action. The Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing.
26.
Hymes, D.
(1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In R. Husley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods (pp. 5-28). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Keppel, G.
(1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
King, B.
, Birnbaum, J., & Wageman, J. (1984). Word processing and the basic college writer. In T. Martinex (Ed.), The written word and the word processor (pp. 251-266). Philadelphia, PA: Delaware Valley Writing Council.
29.
Levin, J.
, & Boruta, M. (1983). Writing with computers in classrooms: You get exactly the right amount of space!Theory Into Practice, 22, 291-295.
30.
Linn, R.
, Kiplinger, V., Chapman, C. & LeMahieu, P. (1992). Cross-state comparability of judgements of students' writing: Reports from the New Standards Project. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Report No. CSE-TR-335.
31.
Lutz, J.
(1987). A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer and with pen and paper. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 398-421.
32.
Mackenzie, J.
(1984). Accordion writing: Expository composition with the word processor. English Journal, September, 56-58.
33.
Mehan, H.
(1984). A quasi-experiment in guided change (Project #6-83-0027: A Holistic Approach to Computer Literacy. 4th Quarter Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
34.
Mehan, H.
(1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice?Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 4-22.
35.
Michaels, S.
, & Bruce, B. (1989). Classroom contexts and literacy development: How writing systems shape the teaching and learning of composition (Technical Report No. 476). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
36.
Nichols, R.
(1986). Word processing and basic writers. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 81-97.
37.
Oakes, J.
(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
38.
Owston, R.
, Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students' writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 249-276.
39.
Papert, S.
(1987). Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16, 22-30.
40.
Purves, A.
(1992). Reflections on research and assessment in written composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 108-122.
41.
Rubin, A.
, & Bruce, B. (1983). QUILL: Reading and writing with a microcomputer. In B. Hutson (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research, Vol. III (pp. 97-117). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Scribner, S.
, & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Selfe, C.
, & Wahlstrom, B. (1986). An emerging rhetoric of collaboration: Computers, collaboration, and the composing process. Collegiate Microcomputer, 4, 289-296.
44.
Sutton, R.
(1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61, 475-503.
45.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Woodruff, E.
, Lindsay, P., Bryson, M., & Joram, E. (1986, April). Some cognitive effects of word processors on enriched and average eighth grade writers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
