Although social psychologists have studied how people form impressions of others either through viewing them, listening to them speak, or reading written descriptions of them, researchers have not looked extensively at the ways in which readers form impressions of writers' personalities while reading their texts. This article reports on a series of studies in which different groups of readers were asked to respond to essays written by high school students applying for college admission. Our findings suggest that independent readers' impressions of writers' personalities overlap far more than would be expected by chance, that readers' impressions of writers' personalities can have practical consequences for writers, and that texts can be revised so as to influence, in predicted ways, the types of personality traits that readers are likely to infer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H.
(1968). A simple model for information integration. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 731-743). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Anderson, N. H.
(1974). Information integration theory: A brief survey. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 236-305). San Francisco: Freeman.
3.
Anderson, N. H.
(1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Anderson, N. H.
(1989). Functional memory and on-line attribution. In J. N. Bassili (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 175-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Anderson, N. H.
, & Hubert, S. (1963). Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379-391.
6.
Anderson, R. C.
, Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.
7.
Becker, J. A.
(1991). Teachers' impressions of children varying in pragmatic skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 397-412.
8.
Bierhoff, H.-W.
(1989). Person perception and attribution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Bleich, D.
(1978). Subjective criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Bless, H.
(1992). Mood effects on the organization of person information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 497-509.
11.
Fish, S. E.
(1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
Gibson, W. W.
(1966). Tough, sweet & stuffy: An essay on modern American prose styles. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
Gibson, W. W.
(1969). Persona: A style study for readers and writers. New York: Random House.
14.
Holland, N. N.
(1980). Unity identity text self. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (pp. 118-133). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Holtgraves, T.
(1991). Depression and processing information about others. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 445-453.
16.
Huber, S.
(1989). The impact of stereotypes on person judgment. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
Iser, W.
(1971). Indeterminacy and the reader's response in prose fiction. In J. H. Miller (Ed.), Aspects of narrative (pp. 1-45). New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
Jones, E. E.
, & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Jones, E. E.
, & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 390-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Kalos, M. H.
, & Whitlock, P. A. (1986). Monte Carlo methods: Volume 1. The basics. New York: Wiley.
21.
Kelley, H. H.
(1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
Kelley, H. H.
(1972). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
23.
Lang, A. R.
(1992). Person perception as a function of drinking behavior, gender and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 225-232.
24.
Lassiter, G. D.
(1991). Need for cognition, causal processing, and memory for behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 694-700.
25.
Mackie, D. M.
(1992). The generalization of outcome-biased counter-stereotypic inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 43-64.
26.
Mandler, J. M.
, & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
27.
McCormick, K.
, & Waller, G. F. (1987). Text, reader, ideology: The interactive nature of the reading situation. Poetics, 16, 193-208.
28.
Nisbett, D. J.
(1992). Clothing fashionability and students with a disability: Impressions of social and mental competencies. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 11, 39-44.
29.
Odell, L.
(1981). Defining and assessing competence in writing. In C. R. Cooper (Ed.), The nature and measurement of competency in English (pp. 95-138). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
Pichert, J. W.
, & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309-315.
31.
Rubin, D.
(1991). Effects of accented speech and culture-typical compliance-gaining style on subordinates' impressions of managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 267-283.
32.
Skowronski, J. J.
(1992). Caught in the act: When impressions based on highly diagnostic behaviours are resistant to contradiction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 435-452.
33.
Spiro, R. J.
(1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Spivey, N. N.
(1987). Construing constructivism: Reading research in the United States. Poetics, 16, 169-192.
35.
Tompkins, J. P.
(1980). Reader response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Vrij, A.
(1992a). Crosscultural police-citizen interactions: The influence of race, beliefs, and nonverbal communication on impression formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1546-1559.
37.
Vrij, A.
(1992b). Interviews with ethnic interviewees: Non-verbal communication errors in impression formation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2, 199-208.
38.
Zebrowitz, L. A.
(1992). Impressions of babyfaced individuals across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1143-1152.
