Interdisciplinary research is often described as the recasting of disciplinary boundaries, suggesting that interdisciplinary writing might require a “boundary rhetoric”—one that negotiates the borders between the various disciplinary rhetorics involved. An example of such a boundary rhetoric can be found in the work of S. E. Jelliffe, a prominent physician-writer who proposed an innovative and controversial theory of psychosomatic medicine that offers to unite neurology and Freudian psychoanalysis. Jelliffe's work—in both its successes and failures—suggests some of the textual and conventional ways in which a boundary rhetoric can operate. At its most successful, Jelliffe's boundary rhetoric blurs the generic conventions and expectations of his constituent fields and “translates” the values and principles of one discipline into the language and discourse forms of the other. Given the increasing interdisciplinary character of much modern scholarship, Jelliffe's case is important in helping to illuminate potential problems and possibilities inherent in boundary rhetorics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genres and the activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
Bazerman, C.
, & Paradis, J. (1991). Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies in professional communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Berkenkotter, C.
(1991). Paradigm debates, turf wars, and the conduct of sociocognitive inquiry in composition. College Composition and Communication, 42, 151-169.
4.
Blustein, B. E.
(1981). “A hollow square of psychological science”: American neurologists and psychiatrists in conflict. In A. Scull (Ed.), Madhouses, mad-doctors, and madmen: The social history of psychiatry in the Victorian era (pp. 241-270). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Brodkey, L.
(1987). Writing ethnographic narratives. Written Communication, 4, 27-50.
6.
Brody, H.
(1988). Stories of sickness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Brooks, P.
(1984). Reading for the plot: Design and intention in narrative. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
8.
Bruner, J.
(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Bruner, J.
(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Burnham, J. C.
(1983). Jelliffe: American psychoanalyst and physician. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Burnham, J. C.
(1981). The founding of the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry; Or, what was wrong with theJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease? Journal of the History of Medicine, 36, 310-324.
12.
Carter, M.
(1990). The idea of expertise: An exploration of cognitive and social dimensions of writing. College Composition and Communication, 41, 265-286.
13.
Charon, R.
(1992). To build a case: Medical histories as traditions in conflict. Literature and Medicine, 11, 115-132.
14.
Flower, L.
(1989). Cognition, context, and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40, 282-311.
15.
Geertz, C.
(1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Geisler, C.
(1992). Exploring academic literacy: An experiment in composing. College Composition and Communication, 43, 39-54.
17.
Gould, S. J.
(1989). Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: Norton.
18.
Grob, G. N.
(1983). Mental illness and American society, 1875-1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Grob, G. N.
(1985). The inner world of American psychiatry, 1890-1940. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20.
Hale, N. G., Jr.
(1971). Freud and the Americans: The beginning of psychoanalysis in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Hawkins, A. H.
(1986). A. R. Luria and the art of clinical biography. Literature and Medicine, 5, 1-15.
22.
Hawkins, A. H.
(1992). Editor's column. Literature and Medicine, 11, vii-xi.
23.
Hull, G.
, Rose, M., Fraser, K. L., & Castellano, M. (1991). Remediation as a social construct: Perspectives from an analysis of classroom discourse. College Composition and Communication, 42, 299-326.
24.
Hunter, K. M.
(1992). Remaking the case. Literature and Medicine, 11, 163-179.
25.
Jelliffe, S. E.
(1927). Postencephalitic respiratory disorders: Review of syndromy, case reports, physiopathology, psychopathology, and therapy. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
26.
Jelliffe, S. E.
(1932). Psychopathology of forced movements and the oculogyric crises of lethargic encephalitis. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
27.
Jelliffe, S. E.
(1939). Sketches in psychosomatic medicine. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
28.
Jelliffe, S. E.
, & White, W. A. (1915). Diseases of the nervous system: A test-book in neurology and psychiatry. New York: Lea and Febiger.
29.
Journet, D.
(1990). Forms of discourse and the sciences of the mind: Luria, Sacks, and the role of narrative in neurological case histories. Written Communication, 7, 171-199.
30.
Kermode, F.
(1966). The sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Kleinman, A.
(1987). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Lewontin, R.
, Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. New York: Pantheon.
33.
Luria, A. R.
(1979). The making of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Lyons, A.
(1992). Interdisciplinarity: Giving up territory. College English, 54, 681-693.
35.
Mackie, J. B.
(1974). 1902-1944: The 42-year editorship of Smith Ely Jelliffe, a practical mystic. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 159, 305-318.
36.
Maranhao, T.
(1990). Psychoanalysis: Science or rhetoric? In H. W. Simons (Ed.), The rhetorical turn (pp. 116-144). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
McCarthy, L.
(1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the profession (pp. 358-378). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
McCarthy, L.
, & Fishman, S. (1991). Boundary conversations: Conflicting ways of knowing in philosophy and interdisciplinary research. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 419-468.
39.
Monroe, W. F.
, Hollemann, W. L., & Holleman, M. C. (1992). Is there a person in this case?Literature and Medicine, 11, 45-63.
40.
Myers, G.
(1989). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
41.
Myerson, A.
(1939-1940). The attitude of neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists towards psychoanalysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 96, 623-641.
42.
Nelson, J. S.
, Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
43.
North, S.
(1987). The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
44.
Phelps, L.
(1988). Composition as a human science: Contributions to the self-understanding of a discipline. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Powell, R. C.
(1977). Helen Flanders Dunbar (1902-1959) and a holistic approach to psychosomatic problems: I. The rise and fall of a medical philosophy. Psychiatric Quarterly, 49, 133-152.
46.
Quen, J. M.
(1977). Asylum psychiatry, neurology, social work, and mental hygiene: An exploratory study of interprofessional history. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8, 3-11.
47.
Ricoeur, P.
(1981). Narrative time. In W.J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 165-186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Rorty, R.
(1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Rudwick M.
(1985). The Great Devonian controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Sacks, O.
(1983). Awakenings. New York: E. P. Dutton.
51.
Sacks, O.
(1986). Clinical tales. Literature and Medicine, 5, 16-23.
52.
Schafer, R.
(1981). Narration in the psychoanalytic dialogue. In W.J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 25-49). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Simons, H. W.
(1990). The rhetorical turn: Invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
White, Hayden
. (1987). The form of the content. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
Wilson, E. O.
(1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
