This article explores the uses of ethnomethodology in developing a robust sociocognitive theory of writing. Ethnomethodology, a radical movement in sociology that studies people's sense-making practices, has some parallel interests with cognitive-process research in composition. At the same time, because ethnomethodology is attuned to how sense-making involves organizing social structure, it also shares parallel interests with social-constructionist thought in composition. This article uses ethnomethodological perspectives to translate the language of Flower and Hayes's cognitive theory of writing into a more thoroughly social vocabulary as a way of articulating the role of social context and social structure in individual acts of writing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R.
, Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D., & Goetz, E. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-382.
2.
Atkinson, J. M.
(1990). Ethnomethodological approaches to socio-legal studies. In J. Coulter (Ed.), Ethnomethodological sociology (pp. 450-472). Brookfield, VT: Edgar Elgar.
3.
Augustine, D.
, & Winterowd, R. (1986). Speech acts and the reader-writer transaction. In B. T. Petersen (Ed.), Convergences: Transactions in reading and writing (pp. 127-148). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4.
Bazerman, C.
(in press). Whose moment? The kairotics of intersubjectivity. In P. Sipioria (Ed.), Kairos. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
5.
Benson, D.
, & Hughes, J. (1991). Method: evidence and inference—evidence and inference for ethnomethodology. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 109-136). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Berkenkotter, C.
(1991). Paradigm debates and sociocognitive inquiry. College Composition and Communication, 42, 151-169.
7.
Brandt, D.
(1986). Toward an understanding of context in composition. Written Communication, 3, 139-157.
8.
Brandt, D.
(1989). The message is the massage: Orality and literacy once more. Written Communication, 6, 31-44.
9.
Brandt, D.
(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of writers, readers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
Brodkey, L.
(1989). On the subjects of class and gender in “The Literacy Letters.”College English, 51, 125-141.
11.
Brown, J. S.
, Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
12.
Button, G.
(1991). Introduction: Ethnomethodology and the foundational respecification of the human sciences. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cicourel, A. V.
(1968). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley.
14.
Cicourel, A. V.
(1974). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
15.
Cicourel, A. V.
, Jennings, S.H.M., Jennings, K. H., Leiter, K.C.W., MacKay, R., Mehan, H., & Roth, D. R. (1974). Language and social performance. New York: Wiley.
16.
Cooper, M.
, & Holzman, M. (1989). Writing as social action. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
17.
Coulter, J.
(1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
Crismore, A.
(1989). Talking to readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
19.
Douglas, J. D.
(Ed.). (1970). Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
Flower, L.
(1988). The construction of purpose in writing and reading. College English, 50, 528-550.
21.
Flower, L.
(1989). Cognition, context, and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40, 282-311.
22.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32.
23.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
24.
Flower, L.
, Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, M., McCormick, K., & Peck, W. (1990). Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Garfinkel, H.
(1967a). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
Garfinkel, H.
(1967b). Practical sociological reasoning: Some features of the work of the Los Angeles Suicide Prevention Center. In E. S. Schneiderman (Ed.), Essays in self-destruction (pp. 171-187). New York: International Science Press.
27.
Garfinkel, H.
(1974). The origins of the term ethnomethodology. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 15-18). Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin.
28.
Garfinkel, H.
(Ed.). (1985). Ethnomethodological studies of work. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29.
Garfinkel, H.
, & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J.E. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
30.
Garfinkel, H.
, Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
31.
Greene, S.
(1990). Toward a dialectical theory of composition. Rhetoric Review, 9, 149-171.
32.
Halliday, M.A.K.
, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
33.
Handel, W.
(1982). Ethnomethodology: How people make sense. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Haas, C.
, & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the construction of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39, 167-183.
35.
Heap, J.
(1976a). Reconceiving the social. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 271-281.
36.
Heap, J.
(1976b). What are sense making practices?Sociological Inquiry, 46, 107-115.
37.
Heap, J.
(1991a). Reading as cultural activities: Enabling and reflective texts. Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 11-39.
38.
Heap, J.
(1991b). Ethnomethodology, cultural phenomenology, and literacy activities. Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 111-117.
39.
Heeren, J.
(1970). Alfred Schutz and the sociology of common-sense knowledge. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 45-56). Chicago: Aldine.
40.
Heyman, R.
(1991). Reading as cultural activities: What ever happened to indexical and reflexive properties of language?Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 105-107.
41.
Lee, J.
(1991). Language and culture: The linguistic analysis of culture. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 196-226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Livingston, E.
(1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
Lynch, M.
(1991). Method: measurement—ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77-108). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Maynard, D. W.
, & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385-418.
45.
McHoul, A. W.
(1982). Telling how texts talk: Essays in reading and ethnomethodology. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
46.
Mehan, H.
(1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Nystrand, M.
(1986). The structure of written communication. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
48.
Olson, D. R.
(1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
49.
Olson, D. R.
(1980). Some social aspects of meaning in oral and written language. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Social foundations of language and thought (pp. 90-110). New York: Norton.
50.
Psathas, G.
(1989). Phenomenology and sociology: Theory and research. Current continental research 215. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press.
51.
Rubin, D.
(1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1, 211-245.
52.
Sacks, H.
, Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, F. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
53.
Schegloff, E.
(1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
54.
Schutz, A. J.
(1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality (M. Natanson, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijoff.
55.
Sharrock, W. W.
, & Anderson, R. J. (1986). The ethnomethodologists. London: Tavistock.
56.
Smith, D. E.
(1974). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257-268.
57.
Smith, D. E.
(1988). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
58.
Spilich, G. J.
, Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, V. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290.
59.
Tuman, M.
(1987). A preface to literacy: An inquiry into pedagogy, practice, and progress. University: University of Alabama Press.
60.
Voss, J.
, Vesonder, G., & Spilich, G. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651-667.
61.
VandeKopple, W. J.
(1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
62.
Wilson, N.
(1975). The practice of knowledge: An analytic perspective on the work of Harold Garfinkel. Paper presented at American Sociological Association meetings. (Quoted in Psathas [1989, p. 105]).
63.
Zimmerman, D. E.
, & Pollner, M. (1970). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 80-93). Chicago: Aldine.
