This article reports a study of the writing experience of 40 eleventh-grade writers and examines the social and pedagogical circumstances that contributed to limited concentration and limited motivation for their writing. Methodology included in-depth phenomenological interviewing, composing aloud exercises, and classroom observation; the data were analyzed using qualitative procedures. The study (a) defines and describes four different ways in which emotion disrupts cognition to intrude on concentration in writing, (b) investigates social issues and contextual events that precipitate this struggle with concentration, and (c) explores the effect that this struggle has on writing motivation. Pedagogy is discussed as it was experienced by the participants and as it related to concentration and motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agar, M. H.
(1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Ames, R.
, & Ames, C. (Eds.). (1984). Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3.
Ames, C.
, & Ames, R. (Eds.). (1989). Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Bertaux, D.
(Ed.). (1981). Biography and society: The life approach in social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Bloom, L.
(1985). Anxious writers in contest. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 119-133). New York: Guilford.
6.
Bogdan, R. C.
, & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Britton, J.
, Burgess T., Martin, N., Mcleod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (pp. 11-18). London: Macmillan.
8.
Cleary, L. M.
(1988). A profile of Carlos: Strengths of the nonstandard dialect writer. English Journal, 77, 59-64.
9.
Cleary, L. M.
(1990). The fragile inclination to write: Praise and criticism in the classroom. English Journal, 79(2), 22-28.
10.
Cleary, L. M.
(1991). From the other side of the desk: Students speak out about writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook of Heinemann.
11.
Combs, A.
, Avila, D., & Purkey, W. (1978) The helping relationship. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
, & Nakamura, J. (1989). Dynamics of intrinsic motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol.3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 43-71). New York: Academic Press.
13.
Daly, J. A.
(1985). Writing apprehension. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write. (pp. 43-82). New York: Guilford.
14.
Daly, J. A.
, & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument of measure of writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 242-249.
15.
DeCharms, R.
(1984). Motivation enhancement. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation (pp. 275-308). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Deci, E.
(1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
17.
Emig, J.
(1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
18.
Ericcson, K.
, & Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
19.
Farr, M.
, & Janda, M. J. (1985). Basic writing students: Investigating oral and written language. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(1), 62-83.
20.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1(1), 120-160.
21.
Flower, L.
, Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16-55.
22.
Frazier, L.
(1982, October). Human attributions that lead to speech acquisition. Lecture given at University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
23.
Graves, D.
(1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24.
Hart, L.
(1983). Programs, patterns and downshifting in learning to read. Reading Teacher, 10, 5-11.
25.
Hayes, J.
, & Flower, L. (1980a). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Hayes, J.
, & Flower, L. (1980b). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Larson, R.
(1985). Emotional scenarios in the writing process: An examination of young writers' affective experience. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 19-42). New York: Guilford.
28.
Lepper, M.
, & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.) Research on motivation in education: Vol.3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 43-71). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Lofland, J.
(1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30.
Mishler, E.
(1979). Meaning in context: Is there any other kind?Harvard Educational Review, 49, 1-19.
31.
Mishler, E.
(1986). Research interviewing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Murray, D.
(1985). The essential delay: When writer's block isn't. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 219-226). New York: Guilford.
33.
Murray, D.
(1986). A writer teaches writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
Perl, S.
(1979). The composing processes of unskilled writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
35.
Perl, S.
(1986). Understanding composing. In T. Newkirk (Ed.), To compose (pp. 28-46). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36.
Piaget, J.
(1952). Origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
37.
Reed, M.
, Burton, J. & Kelly, P. (1985). The effects of writing ability and mode of discourse on cognitive capacity engagement. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 283-297.
38.
Roen, D. H.
, & Wiley, R. J. (1988). The effects of audience awareness on drafting. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 75-88.
39.
Rogers, C.
(1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
40.
Rose, M.
(1985). Complexity, rigor, evolving method, and the puzzle of writer's block: Thoughts on composing-process research. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 227-260). New York: Guilford.
41.
Schuman, D.
(1982). Policy analysis, education, and everyday life: An evaluation of higher education. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
42.
Schutz, A.
(1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
43.
Seidman, E.
, Sullivan, P., & Schatzkamer, M. (1983). On in-depth phenomenological interviewing. In National Institute Education Report, The work of community college faculty. Amherst: School of Education, University of Massachusetts.
44.
Seidman, I. E.
(1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
Selfe, C.
(1985). An apprehensive writer composes. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 83-95). New York: Guilford.
46.
Simon, H.
(1982). Comments. In M. Clark & S. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 333-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Smith, E.
, & Miller, F. (1978). Limits on the perception of cognitive process: A reply to Nisbet and Wilson. Psychological Review, 85, 355-362.
48.
Stipek, D.
(1988). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49.
Weiner, B.
(1982). The emotional consequences of causal attributions. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 185-210) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Weiner, B.
(1984). Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application within an attributional framework. In C. Ames and R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 1. Student motivation (pp. 15-36). New York: Academic Press.
51.
White, P.
(1980). Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem. Psychological Review, 17, 105-112.
