In this article, interviews with a Vietnamese-speaking science student who has repeatedly failed a required English competency examination are presented. Topics relating to this examination include prompt type, essay content, rhetorical organization, student preparation for writing, and audience. Questions are raised regarding the purposes, development, and evaluation of writing competency tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ballard, B.
, & Clanchy, J. (n.d.). Assessment by misconception: Cultural influences and intellectual traditions. Unpublished monograph, Australian National University, Canberra.
2.
Bannai, H.
(1990). Executive summary. Asian Pacific Alliance Education Committee: ESL recommendations. Unpublished manuscript, California State University, Long Beach.
3.
Benson, M. J.
(1991). University-level ESL reading: A content analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 10 (1).
4.
Berkenkotter, C.
, Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversation and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
5.
Black, K.
(1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 231-253.
6.
Brandt, D.
(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of writers, readers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
7.
Bridgeman, B.
, & Carlson, S. B. (1983). Survey of academic writing tasks required of graduate and undergraduate foreign students (Research Rep. No. 83-18). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8.
Brinton, D. M.
, Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.
9.
Carey, L.
, Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Schriver, K. A., & Haas, C. (1989). Differences in writer's initial task representations (Tech. Rep. No. 35). University of California, Berkeley: Center for the Study of Writing.
10.
Carson, J. E.
, Carrell, P. L., Silberstein, S., Kroll, B., & Kuehn, B. (1990). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 245-266.
11.
Casanova, S., C.Cepeda, R.
, Bennett, S., Carlson, D., Charnofsky, H., Daro, P., Merrit, K., Parker, L., Petit, S., White, L., & Wilson, J. (1989). California's limited English language students: An intersegmental agenda. A report to the Intersegmental Coordinating Council from the Curriculum and Assessment Cluster Committee, California State University, Long Beach.
12.
Castell, S. de
, & Luke, A. (1988). Defining “literacy” in North American schools. In E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 159-174). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
13.
Connor, U.
, & Johns, A. M. (1989, March). Argumentation in the disciplines: Studies in business and engineering. Paper presented at the Twenty-third Annual TESOL Convention, San Antonio, TX.
14.
Cumming, A.
(1990). Application of contrastive rhetoric in advanced ESL writing. Paper presented at the 24th Annual TESOL Conference, San Francisco.
15.
Eisterhold, J. C.
(1990). Reading-writing connections: Toward a description for second language learners. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 88-102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Elbow, P.
(1991). Reflections on academic discourse: How it relates to freshmen and colleagues. College English, 53, 135-155.
17.
Faigley, L.
, & Hansen, K. (1985). Learning to write in the social sciences. College Composition and Communication, 36, 140-149.
18.
Flavell, J. H.
(1981). Cognitive thinking. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.). Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Flower, L.
(1987). The role of task representation in reading-to-write (Tech. Rep. No. 6). University of California, Berkeley: Center for the Study of Writing.
20.
Flower, L.
, Schriver, K. A., Carey, L., Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1989). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process (Tech. Rep. No. 34). University of California, Berkeley: Center for the Study of Writing.
21.
Freedman, S. W.
, Dyson, A. H., Flower, L., & Chafe, W. (1987). Research in writing: Past, present and future (Tech. Rep. No. 1). University of California, Berkeley: Center for the Study of Writing.
22.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(1990a). Challenging the task. JALT Journal, 12, 29-36.
23.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(1990b). Essay test strategies and cultural diversity: Pragmatic failure, pragmatic accommodation and the definition of excellence. Paper presented at the 24th Annual TESOL Conference, San Francisco.
24.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
, & Prochnow, S. (1990). The difficulties of difficulty: Prompts in writing assessment. Paper presented at the RELC Seminar, Singapore.
25.
Herrington, A.
(1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
26.
Hoetker, J.
, & Brossell, G. (1986). A procedure for writing content-fair essay examination topics for large-scale writing assessments. College Composition and Communication, 37, 328-335.
27.
Homberg, T.
(1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively?TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87-108.
28.
Horowitz, D.
(1986a). Essay examination prompts and the teaching of academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 107-120.
29.
Horowitz, D.
(1986b). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-462.
30.
Johns, A. M.
(1981). Necessary English: A faculty survey. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 35-44.
31.
Johns, A. M.
(1986). Writing tasks and demands in academic classrooms. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University, California, Academic Skills Center.
32.
Johns, A. M.
(in press). Toward developing a cultural repertoire: The case study of a Lao college freshman. In D. E. Murray (Ed.), Diversity as resource: Redefining cultural literacy. Washington, DC: TESOL.
33.
Johns, C. M. (1976). Examination questions. Unpublished handout, University of Aston, Birmingham, UK.
34.
Jolliffe, D. A.
, & Brier, E. M. (1988). Studying writers' knowledge in academic disciplines. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 35-88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35.
McCarthy, L.
(1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.
36.
Myers, G.
(1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
37.
Nelson, J.
(1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 362-396.
38.
Peck, S.
(1991). Recognizing and meeting student needs. In M. Celce-Murcia. (Ed.). Teaching English as a second/foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 363-372). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
39.
Peyton, J. K.
, Staton, J., Richardson, G., & Wolfram, W. (1990). The influence of writing task on ESL students' written products. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 142-172.
40.
Pollitt, A.
, Hutchinson, C., Entwistle, N., & DeLuca, C. (1985). What makes an examination difficult?Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
41.
Reid, J. M.
(1989). English as a second language composition in higher education: The expectations of the academic audience. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 220-234). New York: Longman.
42.
Report of the English as a second language workgroup. (1988). Long Beach: Office of the Chancellor, California State University.
43.
Rubin, D. L.
, & Piche, G. L. (1979). Development of syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 9-21.
44.
Rubin, D. L.
, & Rafoth, B. A. (1986). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of expository and persuasive writing among college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 9-21.
45.
Russell, D. R.
(1990). Writing across the curriculum in historical perspective: Toward a social interpretation. College English, 52, 52-73.
46.
Saville-Troike, M.
(1982). The ethnography of communication. London: Basil-Blackwell.
47.
Scardamalia, M.
, & Bereiter, C. (1982). Assimilative processes in composition planning. Educational Psychologist, 17, 165-171.
48.
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Sweedler-Brown, C.
(1991, March). Influence of the syntax vs. the rhetoric in holistic evaluation of ESL writing. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on College Composition and Communication, Boston.
50.
Tomlinson, B.
(1984). Talking about the composing process. Written Communication, 1, 429-445.
51.
Toulmin, S.
(1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Winfield, F. E.
, & Barner-Felfelli, P. (1982). The effects of familiar and unfamiliar cultural context on foreign language composition. Modern Language Journal, 66, 373-378.
