Theoretical and pedagogical interest in writing in academic disciplines and other discourse communities has grown in the last decade, but few studies have looked at advanced levels of disciplinary enculturation. In this study, I examine the contexts for writing and response in a graduate education seminar with fifteen students, including eight nonnative speakers of English. I consider how the professor explicitly and implicitly communicated expectations for the form and content of writing assignments; how the students understood, negotiated and undertook these tasks; and how the professor evaluated and responded to students' final written texts. Finally, I argue that the students' writing tasks occur in a complex, multidimensional historical field of personal and social contexts and that advanced levels of disciplinary enculturation are marked by a specific set of issues revolving around students' emerging authority and conflicts inherent in disciplinary microsocieties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anson, C. M.
(1988). Toward a multidimensional model of writing in the academic disciplines. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research volume 2: Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 1-33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Anson, C. M.
(Ed.). (1989). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3.
Baker, R. L.
, & Schutz, R. E. (Eds.). (1972). Instructional product research. New York: Van Nostrand.
4.
Bakhtin, M.
(1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.; M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1935)
5.
Bartholomae, D.
(1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford.
6.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Beach, R.
, & Bridwell, L. S. (1984). Introduction. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 1-14). New York: Guilford.
8.
Becher, T.
(1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Stony Stratford, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
9.
Becker, H. S.
, Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Becker, H. S.
, Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New York: Wiley.
11.
Berkenkotter, C.
, Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
12.
Bizzell, P.
(1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT, 3, 213-243.
13.
Bizzell, P.
(1989). Cultural criticism: A social approach to studying writing. Rhetoric Review, 7, 224-230.
14.
Bonk, C. J.
(1990). A synthesis of social cognition and writing research. Written Communication, 7, 136-163.
15.
Borg, W. R.
& Gall, M. D. (1987). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
16.
Brandt, D.
(1986). Toward an understanding of context in composition. Written Communication, 3, 139-157.
17.
Brandt, D.
(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of readers, writers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
Bridgeman, B.
, & Carlson, S. (1983). Survey of academic writing tasks required of graduate and undergraduate foreign students (Report No. 83-18). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
19.
Bruffee, K. A.
(1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographic essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
20.
Canale, M.
, & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
21.
Clark, G.
(1990). Dialogue, dialectic, and conversation: A social perspective on the function of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
22.
Clark, G.
, & Doheny-Farina, S. (1990). Public discourse and personal expression: A case study of theory-building. Written Communication, 7, 456-481.
23.
Cooper, C. R.
, & Odell, L. (Eds.). (1977). Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24.
Cooper, M. C.
(1989). Why are we talking about discourse communities? Or, foundationalism rears its ugly head once more. In M. C. Cooper and M. Holzman, Writing as social action (pp. 202-220). Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
25.
Doheny-Farina, S.
(1989). A case study of one adult writing in academic and nonacademic discourse communities. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp.17-42). New York: Random House.
26.
Duck, S.
(Ed.). (1988). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. New York: Wiley.
27.
Durkheim, E.
(1933). The division of labor in society. (G. Simpson, Trans.) Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published in 1893)
28.
Faigley, L.
(1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
29.
Faigley, L.
, & Hansen, K. (1985). Learning to write in the social sciences. College Composition and Communication, 36, 140-149.
30.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
31.
Flower, L.
(1990). Introduction: Studying cognition in context. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W. Peck, Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 3-32). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Freedman, S. W.
(Ed.). (1986). The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Freedman, S. W.
(1987). Response to student writing (NCTE Research Rep. No. 23). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
34.
Gadamer, H.
(1987). The problem of historical consciousness. In P. Rabinow & W. Sullivan (Eds.), The interpretive turn: A second look (2nd ed., pp. 82-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Geertz, C.
(1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Gere, A. R.
, & Stevens, R. S. (1986). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In S. W. Freedman. (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 85-105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37.
Gilbert, G. N.
, & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Gilligan, C.
(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39.
Grimshaw, A. D.
(1989). Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
Harris, J.
(1989). The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication, 40, 11-37.
41.
Heath, S. B.
(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Herrington, A. J.
(1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
43.
Herrington, A. J.
(1988). Teaching, writing, and learning: A naturalistic study of writing in an undergraduate literature course. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research, volume 2: Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 133-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Horowitz, D.
(1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-462.
45.
Huot, B.
(1990). The literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational Research, 60, 237-263.
46.
Hymes, D.
(1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
47.
Jolliffe, D. A.
(Ed.). (1988). Advances in writing research volume 2: Writing in academic disciplines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48.
Jolliffe, D. A.
, & Brier, E. M. (1988). Studying writers' knowledge in academic disciplines. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research volume 2: Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 35-88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49.
Kinneavy, J. L.
(1983). Writing across the curriculum. Profession, 13-20.
50.
Kohlberg, L.
(1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
51.
Latour, B.
, & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Original work published in 1979)
52.
Lawson, B.
, Ryan, S. S., & Winterowd, W. R. (Eds.). (1989). Encountering student texts: Interpretive issues in student writing. Urbana, IL. National Council of Teachers of English.
53.
McCarthy, L. P.
, (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.
54.
McGinley, W.
, & Tierney, R. J. (1989). Traversing the topical landscape: Reading and writing as ways of knowing. Written Communication, 6, 243-269.
55.
McMillan, J. H.
, & Schumacher, S. (1989). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
56.
McNeil, L. M.
(1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
57.
Miller, C. R.
, & Selzer, J. (1985). Special topics of argument in engineering reports. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 309-341). New York: Guilford.
58.
Moll, L. C.
, & Diaz, S. (1987). Change as the goal of educational research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 301-312.
59.
Mosenthal, P.
(1983). On defining writing and classroom writing competence. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 26-74). New York: Longman.
60.
Myers, G.
(1985). The social construction of two biologist's proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
61.
Myers, G.
(1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
62.
Nelson, J.
(1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 362-396.
63.
Nelson, J.
, & Hayes, J. (1988). How the writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources (Tech. Rep. No. 16). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Study of Writing.
64.
Nelson, J. S.
, Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (Eds.). (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
65.
Nespor, J.
(1987). Academic tasks in a high school English class. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 203-228.
66.
Nystrand, M.
(1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 66-85.
67.
Odell, L.
, & Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.
68.
Odell, L.
, Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 221-236). New York: Longman.
69.
Phelps, L. W.
(1988). Composition as a human science: Contributions to self-understanding of a discipline. New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
Porter, J.E.
(1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5, 34-47.
71.
Rafoth, B. A.
, & Rubin, D. L. (Eds.). (1988). The social construction of written communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
72.
Scheff, T. J.
(1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Sternglass, M. S.
(1988). The presences of thought: Introspective accounts of reading and writing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74.
Sternglass, M. S.
, & Pugh, S. L. (1986). Retrospective accounts of language and learning processes. Written Communication, 3, 297-323.
75.
Ulichny, P.
, & Watson-Gegeo, K. (1989). Interactions and authority: The dominant interpretive framework in writing conferences. Discourse Processes, 12, 309-328.
76.
White, E.
(1985). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
77.
Worton, M.
, & Still, J. (1990). Introduction. In M. Worton & J. Still (Eds.), Intertextuality: Theories and practice (pp. 1-44). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
