Text transmitted electronically through computer-mediated communication networks is an increasingly available yet little documented form of written communication. This article examines the syntactic and stylistic features of an emergent phenomenon called Interactive Written Discourse (IWD) and finds that the concept of “register,” a language variety according to use, helps account for the syntactic reductions and omissions that characterize this historical juxtaposition of text format with real-time and interactive pressures. Similarities with another written register showing surface brevity, the note taking register, are explored. The study is an empirical examination of written communication from a single discourse community, on a single topic, with a single recipient, involving 23 experienced computer users making travel plans with the same travel advisor by exchanging messages through linked computers. The study shows rates of omissions of subject pronouns, copulas, and articles and suggests that IWD is a hybrid, showing features of both spoken and written language. In tracing variable use of conventions such as sentence initial lower case and parentheses, the study shows that norms are gradually emerging. This form of written communication demands study because, as capabilities expand, norms associated with this medium of communication may come to influence or even replace those of more traditional writing styles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Belkin, N. J.
(1986). Designing an intelligent information system interface. In Intelligent design aids in process environments. New York: Springer Verlag.
2.
Bell, A.
(1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
3.
Biber, D.
(1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English. Language, 62, 384-414.
4.
Biber, D.
(1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bizzell, P.
(1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213-243.
6.
Blankenship, J.
(1974). The influence of mode, submode, and speaker predilection on style. Speech Monographs, 41, 85-118.
7.
Bobrow, D. G.
, Kaplan, R. M., Kay, M., Norman, D. A., Thompson, H., & Winograd, T. (1977). GUS: A frame-driven dialog system. Artificial Intelligence, 8, 155-173.
8.
Brunner, H.
, Whittemore, G., Ferrara, K., & Hsu, J. (1989). An assessment of written/interactive dialogue for information retrieval applications (MCC Tech. Rep. No. ACT-HI-245-89). Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
9.
Chafe, W.
(1982). Integration in involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Chafe, W.
, & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83-113). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Charrow, V. P.
(1982). Language in the bureaucracy. In R. J. DiPietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 173-188). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
Coupland, N.
(1980). Style shifting in a Cardiff work setting. Language in Society, 9, 1-12.
13.
Faigley, L.
(1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
14.
Ferguson, C. A.
(1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 209-235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Ferguson, C. A.
(1981). “Foreigner talk” as the name of a simplified register. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 9-18.
16.
Ferguson, C. A.
(1982). Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In L. K. Obler & L. Menn (Eds.) Exceptional language and linguistics (pp. 49-66). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Ferguson, C. A.
(1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12, 153-172.
18.
Ferguson, C. A.
(1985). Special language registers. Discourse Processes, 8, 391-393.
19.
Finegan, E.
(1982). Form and function in testament language. In R. J. DiPietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 113-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Goody, J.
& Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.) Literacy in traditional societies (pp. 53-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Guindon, R.
& Schuldberg, K. (1986). Grammatical and ungrammatical structures in user-advisor dialogues: Implications for the design of natural language interfaces (MCC Tech. Rep. No. HI-86-P). Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
22.
Guindon, R.
& Sladky, P. (1985). Analysis of user/expert dialogues: Task networks and subdialogue markers (MCC Tech. Rep. No. HI-084-85). Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
23.
Guindon, R.
, Sladky, P., Brunner, H., & Conner, J. (1986). The structure of user-advisor dialogues: Is there method in their madness?Proceeding of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
24.
Halliday, M.A.K.
, McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
25.
Hill, W.
(1987). Two hidden operator studies of advice giving for a direct representation interface (MCC Tech. Rep. No. HI-169-87-P). Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
26.
Hotel and travel index. (1986) New York: News America Publishing, Inc.
27.
Hudson, R. A.
(1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Janda, R.
(1985). Note-taking English as a simplified register. Discourse Processes, 8, 437-454.
29.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
30.
Marckworth, M. L.
, & Baker, W. J. (1974). A discriminant function analysis of covariation of a number of syntactic devices in five prose genres. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Microfiche 11.
31.
Martin, J. R.
, (1983). The development of register. In J. Fine & R. O. Freedle (Eds.), Developmental issues in discourse (pp. 1-40,) Vol. 10 in the series Advances in Discourse Processes, R. O. Freedle, Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32.
Maynor, N.
(in press). The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In M. Montgomery & G. Little (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (Publications of the American Dialect Society Series). University: University of Alabama Press.
33.
Murray, D. E.
(1985). Composition as conversation: The computer terminal as medium of communication. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 203-228). New York: Guilford.
34.
Murray, D. E.
(1988). The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in Society, 17, 351-373.
35.
Neal, M.
(1990). Academic register. Unpublished manuscript, Department of English, Texas A&M University.
36.
Nystrand, M.
(1987). The role of context in written communication. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 197-214). New York: Academic Press.
37.
OAG European travel planner. (1986). Oak Brook, IL: Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
38.
Quirk, R.
, Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1980). A grammar of contemporary English. Harlow: Longman.
Rubin, D. L.
(1984). The influence of communicative context on stylistic variations in writing. In A. Pellegrini & T. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 213-232, Vol. 13 in the series Advances in Discourse Processes, R. O. Freedle, Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Straumann, H.
(1935). Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: Allen & Unwin.
42.
Tannen, D.
(1982). The oral/literate continuum in discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written discourse: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 1-16). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
