In light of recent theoretical and empirical developments in the areas of reading, writing, and learning, this article proposes a view of literacy learning in which various forms of reading and writing are conceptualized as unique ways of thinking about and exploring a topic of study en route to acquiring knowledge. Throughout this article, we take the theoretical position that a topic of study is analogous to a conceptual “landscape” about which knowledge is best acquired by “traversing” it from a variety of perspectives. In this system, different forms of reading and writing represent the “traversal routes” through which an individual can explore a given content domain. Specifically, we wish to argue that more complex or diverse combinations of different forms of reading and writing provide a learner with the means to conduct a more critical inquiry of a topic by virtue of the multiple perspectives or ways of “seeing” and thinking that these reading and writing exchanges permit. Finally, in light of this theoretical orientation, we contend that the ability to direct dynamically one's own reading and writing engagements en route to learning is central to conducting an inquiry of this nature. This perspective suggests a reexamination of a line of research that has pursued the question of how writing in combination with reading influences thinking and learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R. C.
, & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York, NY: Longman.
2.
Applebee, A. N.
(1981). Writing in the secondary school: English and the content areas. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3.
Applebee, A. N.
(1984a). Contexts for learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Applebee, A. N.
(1984b). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577-596.
5.
Aristotle
(1975). The art of rhetoric. (J. H. Freese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Barthes, R.
(1974). S/ZNew York: Hill and Wang.
7.
Bleich, D.
(1975). Readings and feelings. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
Britton, J.
(1970). The student's writing. In E. Everetts (Ed.), Explorations in children's writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
9.
Brown, A. L.
(1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Brown, A. L.
, Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
Collins, A.
, Larkin, K. M., & Brown, J. S. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Colvin-Murphy, C.
(1986). Enhancing critical comprehension of literary texts through writing. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
13.
Copeland, K. A.
(in press). Writing as a means to learn from prose. Research in the Teaching of English.
14.
Dansereau, D.
(1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Emig, J.
(1977). Writing as mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-127.
16.
Ennis, R., H.
(1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching for thinking (pp. 9-26). New York: D. H. Freeman.
17.
Flavell, J. H.
(1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior. Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordoff.
18.
Freire, P.
(1982). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.
19.
Fulweiler, T.
, & Young, A. (Eds.). (1982). Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
20.
Gadamer, H.
(1986). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Gage, J.
(1986). Why write? In D. Bartholomea & A. Petrosky (Eds.), The teaching of writing. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
22.
Gere, A. R.
(1985). Roots in the sawdust. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
23.
Giroux, H. A.
(1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
24.
Guthrie, J.
(1986). Panel on reading and writing. In Excellence in education. New York: College Board.
25.
Iser, W.
(1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
26.
Katz, M.
(1982). Critical literacy: A conception of education as a moral right and social ideal. In R. B. Everhart (Ed.) The public school monopoly. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
27.
Kennedy, M. L.
(1985). The composing processes of college students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2, 434-456.
28.
Kucer, S. L.
(1985). The making of meaning: Reading and writing as processes. Written Communication, 2, 317-336.
29.
Langer, J. A.
(1986a). Reading, writing, and understanding: An analysis of the construction of meaning. Written Communication, 3, 219-267.
30.
Langer, J. A.
(1986b). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Langer, J. A.
, & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
32.
Linden, M.
, & Wittrock, M. C. (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 44-57.
33.
Luria, A. R.
, & Yudovich, F. I. (1971). In J. Simon (Ed.), Speech and the development of mental processes in the child. Baltimore: Penguin.
34.
Marshall, J. D.
(1987). The effects of writing on students' understanding of literary text. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 31-63.
35.
Martin, N.
(1975). Writing across the curriculum. London: Ward Lock.
36.
Mayher, J. S.
, Lester, N., & Pradl, G. M. (1983). Learning to write, writing to learn. Boynton/Cook.
37.
McGinley, W. (1989). The role of reading and writing in the acquisition of knowledge: A study of college students' self-directed engagements in reading and writing to learn. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
38.
McGinley, W.
, & Tierney, R. J. (1988). Toward a view of reading and writing as ways of knowing. Reading Education Report No. 423. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
39.
McPeck, J. E.
(1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: St. Martin Press.
40.
Nelson, J.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1988). How the writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources. Technical Report No. 16. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for the Study of Writing.
41.
Newell, G.
(1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 205-287.
42.
Newkirk, T.
, & Atwell, N. (Eds.). (1982). Understanding writing: Ways of observing, learning, and teaching. Chelmsford, MA: Northeast Regional Exchange.
43.
Nostrand, V. A. D.
(1979). Writing and the generation of knowledge. Social Education, 43, 178-180.
44.
O'Flahavan, J. F.
, & Tierney, R. J. (in press). Reading, writing, and critical thinking. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
Paris, S. G.
, Lipson, M. J., & Wixon, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
46.
Paris, S. G.
& Oka, E. (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25-56.
47.
Perl, S.
(1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
48.
Pintrich, P.
(1987). Motivated learning strategies in the college classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
49.
Pokey, P. A. (1988). Predicting achievement in geometry early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and learning strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
50.
Rohrkemper, M.
, & Bershon, B. (1984). Elementary school students' reports of the causes and effects of problem difficulty in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 85, 127-147.
51.
Rosenblatt, L. M.
(1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: The Southern Illinois University Press.
52.
Rumelhart, D. E.
(1984). Understanding understanding. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
53.
Salvatori, M.
(1985). The dialogical nature of basic reading and writing. In D. Bartholomae & A. Petrosky (Eds.), Facts, artifacts, and counterfacts. NJ: Boyton/Cook.
54.
Shepard, C.
, & Reynolds, R. (1987). What is metacognition? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
55.
Smith, F.
(1988). Joining the literacy club. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
56.
Spiro, R. J.
(1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
57.
Spiro, R. J.
, Vispoel, W. L., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. Technical Report No. 409. Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
58.
Tchudi, S.
(1988). Invisible thinking and the hypertext. English Journal, 77, 22-30.
59.
Tierney, R. J.
, & Pearson, P. D. (1984). Toward a composing model of reading. In J. M. Jensen (Ed.), Composing and comprehending. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
60.
Tierney, R. J.
, Soter, A., O'Flahavan, J. F., & McGinley, W. (in press). The effects of reading and writing upon thinking critically. Reading Research Quarterly.
61.
Van DeWeghe, R.
(1987). Making and remaking meaning: Developing literacy responses through purposeful, informal writing. English Quarterly, 20, 38-51.
62.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
63.
Walters, K.
, Daniell, B., & Trachsel, M. (1987). Formal and functional approaches to literacy. Language Arts, 64, 855-868.
64.
Weinstein, C.
& Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
65.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
66.
Wittrock, M. C.
(1984). Writing and the teaching of reading. In J. M. Jensen (Ed.), Composing and comprehending. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
