In this decade, writing researchers have shown increasing interest in the social aspects of written communication. This interest has largely been stimulated by interest in writing-across-the-curriculum programs and dialogue journal keeping, as well as such pressing issues as the relationships of process to text and to the social contexts of writing, and the problem of genre. This article outlines a social-interactive model of written communication, highlighting the writer's role in negotiations with readers in the medium of text. Formalist theories of text meaning (meaning is in the text) and idealist theories of meaning (meaning in the reader) are reviewed and challenged. In social-interactive theories of discourse, which are proposed as an alternative to formalist and idealist theories, meaning is said to be a social construct negotiated by writer and reader through the medium of text, which uniquely configures their respective purposes. In the process of communicating, writers and readers may be said to make various “moves,” which achieve progressive and sequential “states” of understanding between them. Writers make three essential kinds of moves: They (1) initiate and (2) sustain written discourse, which they accomplish by means of (3) text elaboration. The rules for writers' moves are spelled out in a fundamental axiom and seven corollaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applebee, A.
(1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. R. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook in the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Austin, J. L.
(1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bakhtin, M.
, & Medvedev, P. N. (1985). The formal method in literary scholarship: A critical introduction to sociological poetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Bazerman, C.
(1980). A relationship between reading and writing: the conversational model. College English, 41, 656-661.
5.
Bazerman, C.
(1987). Difficulties in characterizing social phenomena of writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the College Composition and Communication Association.
6.
Benson, N. (1979). The effects of peer feedback during the writing process on writing performance, revision behavior, and attitude toward writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.
7.
Bereiter, C.
, & Scardamalia, M. (1984). Learning about writing from reading. Written Communication, 1, 163-188.
8.
Bizzell, P.
(1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213-243.
9.
Bizzell, P.
(1986). Composing processes: An overview. In A. R. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook in the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Brandt, D.
(1986). Toward an understanding of context in composition. Written Communication, 3, 139-157.
11.
Brazil, D.
(1985). Phonology: Intonation in discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 2. Dimensions of discourse. London: Academic Press.
12.
Brodkey, L.
(1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
Bruffee, K.
(1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.”College English, 34, 634-643.
14.
Bruffee, K.
(1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge. College English, 48, 773-790.
15.
de Beaugrande, R.
(1985). Text linguistics in discourse studies. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 1. Disciplines of discourse. London: Academic Press.
16.
de Saussure, F.
(1959). [Course in general linguistics] (C. Bally & A. Sechelaye, Eds., in collaboration with A. Riedlinger; W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.
17.
Dillon, G.
(1981). Constructing texts: Elements of a theory of composition and style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Elbow, P.
(1987). Closing my eyes as I speak: An argument for ignoring audience. College English, 49, 50-69.
19.
Emig, J.
(1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders (NCTE Research Report No. 6). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
20.
Faigley, L.
(1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
21.
Faigley, L.
(1986). Competing theories of process. College English, 48, 527-542.
22.
Fillmore, C.
(1985). Linguistics as a tool for discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 1. Disciplines of discourse. London: Academic Press.
23.
Fish, S.
(1980). Is there a text in this class?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. F. (1980a). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32.
25.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. F. (1980b). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. F. (1980c). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. F. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
28.
Fox, R.
(1980). Treatment of writing apprehension and its effects on composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 39-49.
29.
Gere, A.
, & Stevens, R. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
Gundlach, R.
, McLane, J., Scott, F., & Dowley McNamee, G. (1985). The social foundations of children's early writing development. In M. Farr (Ed.), Advances in writing research: Vol. 1. Children's early writing development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Halliday, M.A.K.
, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
32.
Hickmann, M.
(1987). Social and functional approaches to language and thought. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
33.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr.
(1977). The philosophy of composition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Kroll, B.
(1981). Developmental relationships between speaking and writing. In B. M. Kroll & R. J. Vann (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
35.
Kucer, S.
(1987). The cognitive base of reading and writing. In J. R. Squire (Ed.), The dynamics of language learning: Research in reading and English (pp. 27-51). Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
36.
Lagana, J. (1973). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a model for teaching composition which utilizes individualized learning and peer groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
37.
Mertz, E.
, & Parmentier, R. (1985). Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38.
Nystrand, M.
(1982). Rhetoric's “audience” and linguistics' “speech community”: Implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. New York: Academic Press.
39.
Nystrand, M.
(1983). The context of written communication. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 12(3), 55-65.
40.
Nystrand, M.
(1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
41.
Nystrand, M.
, & Brandt, D. (in press). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. Anson (Ed.), Responding to student writing: Models, methods, and curricular change. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
42.
Odell, L.
, & Goswami, D. (1982). Writing in a non-academic setting. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 201-223.
43.
Olson, D. R.
(1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
44.
Ong, W. J.
(1975). The writer's audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90, 9-21.
45.
Porter, J.
(1986) Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5, 34-47.
46.
Rommetveit, R.
(1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London: John Wiley.
47.
Schaffer, H. R.
(1984). The child's entry into a social world. London: Academic Press.
48.
Schutz, A.
(1967). Collected papers: Vol. 1. The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
49.
Scinto, L.
(1986). Written language and psychological development. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
50.
Smith, F.
(1971). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
51.
Staton, J.
, Shuy, R., Peyton, J., & Reed, L. (1988). Dialogue journal communication: Classroom, linguistic, social, and cognitive views. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
52.
Steinmann, M., Jr.
(1982). Speech-act theory and writing. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. New York: Academic Press.
53.
Tierney, R.
, & LaZansky, J. (1980). The rights and responsibilities of readers and writers: A contractual agreement (Education Report No. 15). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
54.
Tierney, R.
, Leys, M., & Rogers, T. (1984). Comprehension, composition, and collaboration: Analysis of communicative influences in two classrooms. Paper presented at the Conference on Contexts of Literacy, Snowbird, UT.
55.
Vande Kopple, W. J.
(1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
56.
Williams, J.
(in press). Rhetoric and informal reasoning: Disentangling some confounded effects in good reasoning and good writing. In J. Voss (Ed.), Informal reasoning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Witte, S. P.
(1983). Topical structure and invention: An exploratory study. College Composition and Communication, 34, 313-341.
58.
Witte, S. P.
(1987). Pretext and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38, 397-425.
59.
Witte, S. P.
, & Cherry, R. D. (1986). Writing processes and written products in composition research. In C. R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60.
Yeo, H. S.
(1987). Monologue, dialogue, and writing: Bakhtin and composition theory. unpublished paper.
