When writers make frequent grammatical errors, they often spend a substantial part of composing time making decisions about grammar. Studies of unskilled writers with normal hearing indicate this hyperconcern for correctness. There have been reasons to believe, however, that the attention of deaf writers who make errors is less consumed by grammatical decision making. The present study was undertaken to determine whether representative deaf writers devote as much attention to grammatical decisions as unskilled hearing subjects. Ten deaf subjects and five hearing subjects wrote and edited accounts of two short stories that were signed and spoken on videotape. Under all composing conditions, the deaf subjects' rates of pausing were substantially lower than those of the hearing writers. Combined with subjects' patterns of error correction, these findings suggest that the deaf subjects devoted substantially less attention to grammatical decision making during composition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartlett, E.
(1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 345-364). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bereiter, C.
(1980). Development in writing. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Britton, J.
(1980). Shaping at the point of utterance. In A. Freeman & I. Pringle (Eds.), Reinventing the rhetorical tradition (pp. 61-65). Ottowa: L&S Books for the Canadian Council of Teachers of English.
4.
Britton, J.
, Burgess, T., Martin, W., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities: (11-18). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5.
Brumfit, C.
, & Johnson, K. (Eds.). (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. London: Oxford University Press.
6.
Burling, R.
(1982). Sounding right: An introduction to comprehension-based language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7.
Charrow, V. (1974). Deaf English: An investigation of the written English competence of deaf adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
8.
Charrow, V.
(1981). The written English of deaf adolescents. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 1. Variation in writing (pp. 179-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Crandall, K.
(1978). Reading and writing skills and the deaf adolescent. Volta Review, 80, 319-332.
10.
Crandall, K.
(1980). Written language scoring procedures for grammatical correctness according to reader intelligibility. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf.
11.
Eachus, T.
(1971). Modification of sentence writing by deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 116(1), 29-43.
12.
Farr, M.
(1981). Dialect influences in writing. In M. Farr (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 1, pp. 153-166). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Gallaudet College Division of Public Services
. (1981). A handful of stories. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
15.
Goldberg, J. P.
, Ford, C., & Silverman, A. (1984). Deaf students in ESL composition classes: Challenges and strategies. Teaching English to the Deaf and Second-Language Students, 2(2), 4-9.
16.
Grant, E.
, & Leavenworth, R. (1946). Statistical quality control (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Hull, G.
(1984, April). The editing process in writing: A performance study of experts and novices. Paper presented at the annual meeting at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
18.
Hunt, K.
(1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (NCTE Research Report No. 3). Champaign, IL: NCTE. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 113 735)
19.
James, W.
(1908). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life's ideals. London: Longmans, Green.
20.
Jones, S.
(1981). Observing monitor use during the composing process. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Northfield, MN.
21.
Jones, S.
, & Tetroe, J. (1987). Composing in a second language. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 34-57). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22.
Kelly, L.
(1987). The influence of syntactic anomalies on the writing processes of a deaf college student. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 161-196). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23.
Krashen, S. D.
(1978). Individual variation in use of the monitor. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research (pp. 175-184). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Krashen, S.
(1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Pergamon.
25.
Langer, J.
, & Applebee, A. (1986). Moving toward excellence: Writing and learning in the secondary school curriculum (National Institute of Education Grant No. NIE-82-0027). Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
26.
Lenneberg, E.
(1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Martlew, M.
(1983). Problems and difficulties: Cognitive and communicative aspects of writing development. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Development and educational perspectives (pp. 295-333). Chicester, England: John Wiley.
28.
Matsuhashi, A.
(1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 113-134.
29.
Matsuhashi, A.
(1987). Revising the plan and altering the text. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 197-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
Matsuhashi, A.
, & Cooper, C. (1978). A video time-monitored and observational study: Transcribing the behavior and composing processes of a competent high school writer. Toronto: American Education and Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 155701)
31.
Perl, S. (1978). Five writers writing: Case studies of the composing process of unskilled college writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
32.
Pianko, S.
(1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshman writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5-22.
33.
Quigley, S. P.
, Power, D. J., & Steinkamp, M. W. (1977). The language structure of deaf children. Volta Review, 79(2), 73-83.
34.
Scardamalia, M.
(1981). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. Fredericksen & J. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 2. Process, development and communication (pp. 81-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Scardamalia, M.
, Bereiter, C., & Goelman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 173-210). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Shanklin, N.
(1981). Relating reading and writing: Developing a transactional theory of the writing process. Bloomington: Indiana University School of Education.
37.
Shaughnessy, M.
(1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Shewhart, W.
(1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
39.
Smith, F.
(1978). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
40.
Smith, F.
(1984). Reading like a writer. In J. M. Jensen (Ed.), Composing and comprehension (pp. 47-56). Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and National Conference on Research in English.
41.
Wilbur, R. B.
(1977). An explanation of deaf children's difficulty with certain syntactic structures. Volta Review, 79(2), 85-92.
42.
Zamel, V.
(1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case histories. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
