This study examines topic sentences in the academic article context—specifically in articles by professors in biochemistry, civil engineering, history, literature, physics, psychology, and sociology. By using propositional analysis and adapting procedures originally devised by Braddock, the investigation centers on (1) percentage of minor topic sentences, (2) combined percentage of minor and major topic sentences, and (3) percentage of topic sentence “influence.” These three indices show how heavily writers in the corpus rely on topic sentences, although there are variations across disciplines. These variations may be attributed to paragraph length, whole-text structure, or even conventional preferences. However, even when they do not use topic sentences, writers in some disciplines use topic sentence-like features (headings) for the same purposes. Conjecture is that special content and coherence demands make topic sentences a standard feature in academic articles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bain, A.
(1866). English composition and rhetoric: A manual. New York: D. Appleton.
2.
Bizzell, P.
(1978). The ethos of academic discourse. College Composition and Communication, 29, 351-355.
3.
Bizzell, P.
(1982). College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry, 12, 191-207.
4.
Bizzell, P.
, & Herzberg, B. (1985). Writing-across-the-curriculum textbooks: A bibliographic essay. Rhetoric Review, 3, 202-217.
5.
Braddock, R.
(1974). The frequency and placement of topic sentences in expository prose. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 287-302.
6.
Broadhead, G.
, Berlin, J., & Broadhead, M. (1982). Sentence structure in academic prose and its implications for college writing teachers. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 225-240.
7.
Burris, V.
(1983). The social and political consequences of overeducation. American Sociological Review, 48, 454-467.
8.
Chothia, C.
, Lesk, A., Dodson, G., & Hodgkin, D. (1983). Transmission of conformational change in insulin. Nature, 302.
9.
Curtis, F.
(1983). Environmental assessment of Campeau Shopping Center. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 109.
10.
Dzurik, A.
(1983). Multiple use conflicts in a growing economy. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 109.
11.
Emery, A.
(1983). The topicality of depravity in Benito Cereno. American Literature, 55.
12.
Freisinger, R.
, & Petersen, B. (1981). Toward defining “good” writing: A rhetoric analysis of the words, sentences, and paragraphs in 16 industrial scripts. In J. Mathes & T. Pinelli (Eds.), Technical communication: Perspectives for the eighties (pp. 291-304). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
13.
Irmscher, W.
(1981). The Holt guide to English: A comprehensive handbook of rhetoric, language, and literature (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
Jacobs, S.
(1981). Rhetorical information as predication. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 273-249.
15.
Johns, A.
(1980). Cohesion in written business discourse: Some contrasts. The ESP journal, 1, 35-44.
16.
Jolliffe, D.
(1985, March). Rhetoric, social negotiation, and form: Studying writing in the disciplines. Paper presented at College Composition and Communication Conference, Minneapolis.
17.
Kintsch, W.
, & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and reiteration as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
18.
Maimon, E.
(1983). Maps and genres: Exploring connections in the arts and sciences. In E. W. Horner (Ed.), Composition and literature: Bridging the gap (pp. 110-125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
McDowall, D.
, & Loftin, C. (1983). Collective security and the demand for legal handguns. American Journal of Sociology, 88.
20.
McElroy, J.
(1885). The structure of English prose: A manual for composition and rhetoric. New York: Armstrong.
21.
Meyer, B.
(1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. Britton & J. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 11-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Norman, D.
(1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88.
23.
Odell, L.
, & Goswami, D. (1982). Writing in a non-academic setting. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 201-203.
24.
Popken, R. (1984). A study of paragraphs in academic writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
25.
Rodgers, P.
(1965). Alexander Bain and the rise of the organic paragraph. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 51, 399-408.
26.
Rose, M.
(1979). Faculty talk about writing. College English, 41, 272-279.
27.
Rose, M.
(1983). Remedial writing courses: A critique and a proposal. College English, 45, 109-128.
28.
Selzer, J.
(1982). Certain cohesion elements and the readability of technical paragraphs. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12, 285-300.
29.
Selzer, J.
(1983). The composing processes of an engineer. College Composition and Communication, 34, 178-187.
30.
Shaughnessy, M.
(1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Shaughnessy, M.
(1980). Some needed research on writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 3, 98-103.
32.
Smith, R.
, & Frawley, W. (1983). Conjunctive cohesion in four English genres. Text, 3, 347-374.
33.
Stern, A.
(1976). When is a paragraph?College Composition and Communication, 27, 253-257.
34.
Warner, R.
(1979). Teaching the paragraph as a structural unit. College Composition and Communication, 30, 152-155.
35.
Williams, J.
(1981). Nuclear structures in discourse. In M. Hairston & C. Selfe (Eds.), Selected papers from the 1981 Texas writing research conference (pp. 165-189). Austin: Texas Writing Research Group.
36.
Winterowd, W.
(1968). Rhetoric: A synthesis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37.
Winterowd, W.
(1975). Introduction. In W. Winterowd (Ed.), Contemporary rhetoric: A conceptual introduction with readings (pp. 1-37). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
38.
Witte, S.
(1983). Topical structure and revision: An exploratory study. College Composition and Communication, 34, 313-341.
