This study examines the relationship between two measures of individual differences in social cognition and the quality of eleventh grade students' persuasive writing. Subjects completed Crockett's Role Category Questionnaire, and wrote a persuasive letter in response to the problem, “Smoking and the School Nurse.” Letters were submitted to judges for impressionistic and attributional ratings. A content-analytic measure was applied to these 40 papers to yield a measure of the number and quality of persuasive strategies employed. Finally, the same papers were submitted to a second panel, who rated them for overall persuasiveness and appropriateness of tone. Results indicated a significant relationship between interpersonal cognitive complexity and abstractness and quality of writing, persuasiveness, appropriateness of tone, and level of persuasive strategy employed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applegate, J. L.
(1982). The impact of construct system development of communication and impression formation in persuasive contexts. Communication Monographs, 49, 277-289.
2.
Applegate, J. L.
(1983). Construct system development, strategic complexity, and impression formation in persuasive communication. In J. Adams-Webber & J. C. Mancusu (Eds.), Application of personal construct theory. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Applegate, J. L.
, & Delia, J. G. (1980). Person centered speech, psychological development, and the contexts of language use. In R. N. St. Clair & H. Giles (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Berlin, J. A.
(1982). Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical theories. College English, 44, 765-777.
5.
Berthoff, A.
(1978). Forming, thinking, writing: The composing imagination. Rochelle Park, NJ: Hayden.
6.
Bitzer, L. F.
(1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
7.
Bizzell, P.
(1982). Cognition, convention and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213-243.
8.
Bradac, J. J.
(1982). A rose by another name: Attitudinal consequences of lexical variation. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes towards language variation. London: Edward Arnold.
9.
Bruffee, K.
(1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.”College English, 43, 635-652.
10.
Burleson, B. R.
(1984). Role-taking and communication skills in childhood: Why they aren't related and what can be done about it. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 155-170.
11.
Burleson, B. R.
(in press). Cognitive complexity and person-centered communication: A review of methods, findings, and explanations. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Burleson, B. R.
, Applegate, J. L., & Neuwirth, C. M. (1981). Is cognitive complexity loquacity? A reply to Poers, Jordan, and Street. Human Communication Research, 7, 212-225.
13.
Burleson, B. R.
, & Rowan, K. E. (1985). Are social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill related?Written Communication, 2, 25-43.
14.
Church, S.
, & Applegate, J. L. (1981, May). Construct system development and person-centered communication in a police bureaucracy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Minneapolis, MN.
15.
Clark, R. A.
, & Delia, J. G. (1976). The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008-1014.
16.
Cohen, J.
, & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Crockett, W. H.
(1965). Cognitive complexity and impression formation. IN B. A. Mahler (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Crockett, W. H.
, Press, A. N., Delia, J. G., & Kenny, C. T. (1974). Structural analysis of the organization of written impressions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
19.
Crowhurst, M.
(1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223-231.
20.
Delia, J. G.
(1977). Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63, 66-83.
21.
Delia, J. G.
, & Clark, R. A. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perception and the development of listener adapted communication in six-, eight-, ten-, and twelve-year-old boys. Communication Monographs, 44, 326-345.
22.
Delia, J. G.
, & Crockett, W. H. (1973). Social schemes, cognitive complexity, and the learning of social structures. Journal of Personality, 41, 413-429.
23.
Delia, J. G.
, Kline, S. L., & Burleson, B. R. (1979). The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergartners through twelfth graders. Communication Monographs, 46, 241-256.
24.
Delia, J. G.
, & O'Keefe, B. J. (1979). Constructivism: The development of communication in children. In E. Wartella (Ed.), Children communicating. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Dillon, G. F.
(1981). Constructing texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
Ede, L.
, & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171.
27.
Elbow, P.
(1981). Writing with power. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Field, J. P.
, & Weiss, R. H. (1984). Cases for composition (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
29.
Fish, S.
(1980). Is there a text in this class?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Flapan, D.
(1968). Children's understanding of social interaction. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
Flavell, J. H.
, Botkin, P. T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. W., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Flower, L.
(1981). Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
Gibson, W.
(1969). Persona. New York: Random House.
34.
Hale, C. L.
(1980). Cognitive complexity-simplicity as a determinant of communicative effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 47, 304-311.
35.
Irmscher, W. F.
(1976). The Holt guide to English (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36.
Kameen, P.
(1980). Rewording the rhetoric of composition. Pre/Text, 1, 73-90.
37.
Kaplan, B.
, & Crockett, W. H. (1968). Developmental analysis of modes of resolution. In R. P. Abelsonet al. (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
38.
Kelly, G. A.
(1955). The psychology of personal constructs (2 vols.). New York: W. W. Norton.
39.
Kinneavy, J. L.
(1971). A theory of discourse. New York: W. W. Norton.
40.
Kroll, B.
(1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269-281.
41.
Kroll, B. M.
, & Lempers, J. D. (1981). Effect of mode of communication on the informational adequacy of children's explanations. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 138, 27-35.
42.
Kroll, B. M.
(1984a). Audience adaptation in children's persuasive letters. Written Communication, 1, 407-427.
43.
Kroll, B. M.
(1984b). Writing for readers: Three perspectives on audience. College Composition and Communication, 35, 172-185.
44.
Kroll, B. M.
(1985). Social cognitive ability and writing performance: How are they related?Written Communication, 2, 293-305.
45.
Livesley, W. J.
, & Bromley, D. B. (1973). Person perception in childhood and adolescence. London: John Wiley.
46.
Long, R. C.
(1980). Writer audience relationships: Analysis or invention?College Composition and Communication, 31, 221-226.
47.
Lorge, I.
, Thorndike, R. L. (1954). Lorge-Thorndike intelligence tests, level 4. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
Mitchell, R.
, & Taylor, M. (1979). The integrating perspective. College English, 41, 247-271.
49.
Moffett, J.
(1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
50.
Nystrand, M.
(1982). Rhetoric's “audience” and linguistics' “speech community”: Implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know. New York: Plenum.
51.
O'Keefe, B. J.
, & Sypher, H. E. (1981). Cognitive complexity measures and the relationship of cognitive complexity to communication. Human Communication Research, 8, 72-92.
52.
O'Keefe, B. J.
, & Delia, J. G. (1982). Impression formation and message production. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
O'Keefe, D. J.
, Shepard, G. J., & Streetcar, T. (1982). Role category questionnaire measures of cognitive complexity: Reliability and comparability of alternative forms. Central States Speech Journal, 33, 333-338.
54.
Ong, W.
(1975). The writer's audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90, 9-21.
55.
Osgood, C. E.
, Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
56.
Park, D. B.
(1982). The meanings of audience. College English, 44, 247-257.
57.
Perelman, C.
, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: Treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
58.
Phelps, L. W.
(1985). Dialectics of coherence: Toward an integrative theory. College English, 47, 12-29.
59.
Piché, G. L.
(1984, March). Ambiguities and implications in a concept of audience. Paper presented to Department of English, University of Arizona, Tucson.
60.
Piché, G. L.
, Rubin, D. L., & Michlin, M. L. (1978). Age and social class in children's use of persuasive communicative appeals. Child Development, 49, 733-780.
61.
Piché, G. L.
, Rubin, D. L., Turner, L., & Michlin, M. L. (1978). Teachers' subjective evaluations of standard and black nonstandard English compositions: A study of written language attitudes. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 107-118.
62.
Press, A. N.
, Crockett, W. H., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1969). Cognitive complexity and the learning of balanced and unbalanced social structures. Journal of Personality, 37, 541-553.
63.
Roloff, M. E.
, & Berger, C. R. (1982). Social cognition and communication: An introduction. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 9-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
Rubin, D. L.
(1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1, 211-245.
65.
Rubin, D. L.
(1985). Response to Burleson and Rowan. Written Communication, 2, 45-48.
66.
Rubin, D. L.
, & Piché, G. L. (1979). Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 293-316.
67.
Rubin, D. L.
, Piché, G. L., Michlin, M. L., & Johnson, F. (1984). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of fourth-graders' written narratives. In L. Bridwell & R. Beach (Eds.), New directions in research in writing. New York: Guilford.
68.
Rubin, D. L.
, & Rafoth, B. A. (1985). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of expository and persuasive writing among college freshmen. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference of College Composition and Communication, Minneapolis, MN.
69.
Scardamalia, M.
, Bereiter, C., & McDonald, J.D.S. (1977). Role taking in written communication investigated by manipulating anticipatory knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
70.
Secord, P. F.
, & Peevers, B. H. (1974). The development and attribution of person concepts. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Understanding other persons. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
71.
Shantz, C. U.
(1975). The development of social cognition. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
Shantz, C. U.
(1981). The role of role-taking in children's referential communication. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 85-102). New York: Academic Press.
73.
Smith, F.
(1982), Writing and the writer. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
74.
Smith, P. M.
, Giles, H., & Hewstone, M. (1983). New horizons in the study of speech and social situations. In B. Bain (Ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct. New York: Plenum.
75.
Snyder, C. W.
(1976). Persuasive communication: A comparison of seven and twelve year old males. Unpublished master's colloquium paper, University of Minnesota.
76.
Squire, J. R.
, Davidson, D., Emig, J., Hipple, T., Huck, C., Lindley, D., & Moffett, J. (1977). The future direction of English teaching: An informal discussion. In J. R. Squire (Ed.), The teaching of English (National Society for the study of Education, 76th Yearbook, Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
Wallace, K. R.
(1971). The fundamentals of rhetoric. In L. F. Bitzer & E. Black (Eds.), The prospect of rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
78.
Werner, H.
(1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
79.
Winterowd, W. R.
(1975). The contemporary writer. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.
80.
Wood, F.
, Weinstein, E., & Parker, R. (1967). Children's interpersonal tactics. Sociological Inquiry, 37, 129-138.
81.
Wyer, R. S.
, & Carlston, D. E. (1979). Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82.
Young, R. E.
, Becker, A. L., & Pike, K. L. (1970). Rhetoric: Discovery and change. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
83.
Zebroski, J. T.
(1982). Soviet psycholinguistics: Implications for teaching of writing. In W. Frawley (Ed.), Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum.
