This pilot study investigated relationships between individual differences in levels of writing skills and proficiencies at simultaneous and successive cognitive processing. Data from a group of 46 subjects indicate that scores on successive processing tasks were able to predict final grades in an introductory English composition course (p<.01). This suggested both the possibility and importance of investigating further how simultaneous and (especially) successive processing relate to writing skills. With three subjects used for pilot data, low scores in successive processing showed relationships with sentence-level errors and with the ability to develop sequences of ideas in writing. Low scores in simultaneous processing correlated with an inability to indicate clear relationships between sentences and paragraphs. Planning, a third cognitive factor, was found to be a powerful influence in organizing content. In the interaction of planning and simultaneous processing, lack of planning ability may interfere with the writer's ability to survey and thus organize his or her material.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brailsford, A.
, Snart, F., & Das, J. P. (1984). Strategy training and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 287-290.
2.
Christensen, A. L.
(1974). Luria's neuropsychological investigation. Holliswood, New York: Spectrum Publications.
3.
Cooper, C. R.
, et al. (1984). Studying the writing abilities of a university freshman class: Strategies from a case study. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 19-52). New York: The Guilford Press.
4.
Cummins, J. P.
(1979). Language functions and cognitive processing. In J. P. Das, J. R. Kirby, & R. F. Jarman, Simultaneous and successive processes (pp. 175-185). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Cummins, J. P.
, & Das, J. P. (1980). Cognitive processing, academic achievement, and WISC-R performance in EMR children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 777-779.
6.
Cummins, J. P.
, & Mulcahy, R. (1979). Simultaneous and successive processing and narrative speech. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 64-71.
7.
Daiute, C.
(1984). Performance limits on writers. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 205-224). New York: The Guilford Press.
8.
Das, J. P.
(1973). Structure of cognitive abilities: Evidence for simultaneous and successive processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 103-108.
9.
Das, J. P.
(1980). Planning: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Psychological Research, 41, 141-151.
10.
Das, J. P.
(1983). The Essence of Human Intelligence. Address presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.
11.
Das, J. P.
(1984). Intelligence and information integration. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp. 13-31). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Das, J. P.
, & Heemsbergen, D. B. (1983). Planning as a factor in the assessment of cognitive processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 1-15.
13.
Das, J. P.
, Kirby, J. R., & Jarman, R. F. (1975). Simultaneous and successive syntheses: An alternative model for cognitive abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 87-103.
14.
Das, J. P.
, Kirby, J. R., & Jarman, R. F. (1979). Simultaneous and successive processes. New York: Academic Press.
15.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
17.
Gaston, T.
(1978). So you are going to evaluate? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver.
18.
Gaston, T.
(1981). Using the Purdue Office of Writing Review Scoring Sheet. West Lafayette: Purdue University Department of English.
19.
Goldman, R.
, Fristoe, M., & Woodcock, R. W. (1975). Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Auditory Skills Test Battery. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
20.
Hayes, J. R.
, & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Heaton, R. K.
(1981). Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
22.
Kaufman, A. S.
, & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman assessment battery for children (Interpretive Manual). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
23.
Langer, J. R.
(1984). Musings. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 117-118.
24.
Luria, A. R.
(1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Luria, A. R.
(1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. (B. Haigh, trans.). New York: Basic Books.
26.
McCallum, R. S.
, & Merritt, F. M. (1983). Simultaneous-successive processing among college students. Journal of Psychological Research, 1, 85-93.
27.
Merritt, F. M.
, & McCallum, R. S. (1983). Sex-related differences in simultaneous-successive processing?Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 117-119.
28.
Paivo, A.
(1966). Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. Canandian Journal of Psychology, 20, 378-387.
29.
Pask, G.
, & Scott, B.C.E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.
30.
Pendelton, M. G.
, & Heaton, R. K. (1982). A comparison of the Wisconsin card sorting test and the category test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 393-396.
31.
Raven, J. C.
, Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 4: Advanced progressive matrices, sets I and II. London: H. K. Lewis & Co., Ltd.
32.
Robinson, A. L.
, Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R.A.W., & Stilson, D. W. (1980). The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 605-614.
33.
Simon, D. P.
, & Simon, H. A. (1973). Alternative uses of phonemic information in spelling. Review of Educational Research, 43, 115-137.
34.
Wachs, M.
, & Harris, M. (1984). Simultaneous and successive processing in university students: Expanding the limits. West Lafayette, IN: Psychological Services Center, Purdue University.
35.
Wechsler, D.
(1981). WAIS-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corp.
36.
Winer, B. J.
(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
