This article presents a rationale for studying collaborative writing and evidence that coauthors can learn about the writing process from each other. Collaborative writing is explored as an instructional activity that can help students expand their repertoire of writing strategies and their mastery of written communication skills. Collaborative writing activities also offer researchers new insights into the writing process. This discussion about collaborative writing is followed by a case study of two coauthors in the fourth grade who represent general findings from a larger study of 43 fourth- and fifth-grade writers. Detailed analyses of the composing sessions, individual texts, collaborative texts, and interviews indicate that coauthors share creative input, evaluative perspectives, composing strategies, and notions about “good writing” when they work together. Collaborative writing, thus, can complement instruction because it is a direct—albeit subtle—form of learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, H.
(1984). The social context of microcomputers. Paper presented at the AERA, New Orleans.
2.
Bereiter, C.
, & Scardamelia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The rule of instruction in a developing process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Bridwell, L.
(1981). Revising by student writers. Research in the Teaching of English.
4.
Bruce, B., & Rubin, A. (1983). Report to N.I.E. on technology and written communication.
5.
Calkins, L.
(1983). Lessons from a child on the teaching and learning of writing. Exeter, NH: Heineman.
6.
Daiute, C.
(1981). Psycholinguistic foundations of the writing process. Research in the Teaching of English.
7.
Daiute, C.
(1981, 1982, 1983). Interim reports on “The effects of automatic prompting on young writers” study for the Spencer Foundation, Chicago IL.
8.
Daiute, C.
(in press). Do writers talk to themselves? In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Daiute, C.
(1985a). Writing and computers. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
10.
Daiute, C.
& Kruidenier, J. (in press). A self-questioning strategy to increase young writers' revising processes. Applied Psycholinguistics.
11.
Dickensen, D.
(1985). Collaborative writing of second graders. Paper presented at the AERA, Chicago, IL.
12.
Faigley, L.
, & Witte, S. (1980). Revision taxonomy. Paper presented at the NCTE Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio.
13.
Flavell, J. H.
, & Wellman, H. M. (1969). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail, Jr., & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Flower, L.
& Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-388.
15.
Freedman, S.
, Greenleaf, C., Sperling, M., & Parker, L. (1985). The role of response in the acquisition of written language (Final report, NIE-G-083-0065) Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
16.
Freedman, S.
(Ed.). (1985). The acquisition of written language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17.
Graves, D.
(1982). Writing: Children and teachers at work. Exeter, NH: Heineman.
18.
Hartup, W.
(1983). Peer interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
20.
Kohlberg, L.
(1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
Kroll, B.
(1978). Cognitive egocentrism in writers. Research in the teaching of English.
22.
Kuhn, D.
, & Amsel, E. (1984). Developmental trends from middle childhood to adulthood in utilization of belief and evidence as bases for inference of causality. Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College, Columbia University.
23.
Mugny, G.
, Perret-Clermont, A. N., & Doise, W. (1981). Interpersonal coordinations and sociological differences in the construction of the intellect. In G. M. Stephenson, and J. H. Davis, Progress in applied social psychology (pp. 315-344).
24.
Perl, S.
(1979). The composing process of unskilled writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(4), 317-336.
25.
Perret-Clermont, A. N.
(1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. New York: Academic Press.
26.
Piaget, J.
(1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27.
Reil, M.
(1983). Education and ecstasy: Computer chronicles of students writing together. The Quarterly, Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5, 59-67.
28.
Vygotsky, L.
(1972). Mind in society. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Sauberman, Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Welty, E.
(1983). One writer's beginnings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Wertsch, J.
, & Sammarco, J. (1984). Social precursors to individual cognitive functioning: The problem of units of analysis. Draft of paper presented at Fyseen Foundation Conference, Versailles.
31.
Witte, S.
(1984). Collaborative Writing in college. Unpublished manuscript.
