Some of the attempts to establish what standards can define acceptable writing have resulted in the development of grading scales of one sort or another. The controversy about using grading scales to evaluate written composition has received much attention in research and in theory over the past 50 years, but the results of a survey of 600 members of the College Section of National Council of Teachers of English revealed that in the spring of 1984 only 45 or 11.6% of the 386 respondents actually used scales in their evaluations of freshman composition. The theoretical interest in these scales is apparently not matched by their use by teachers of freshman composition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, G. R.
(1978). A comparison of freshman composition grading standards between public two-year and four-year institutions of higher education in the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association 62nd Annual Meeting, March 27-31, 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 155 220)
2.
Cohen, A. M.
(1973). Assessing college students' ability to write. Research in the Teaching of English, 7, 356-371.
3.
Cooper, C.
(1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
4.
Diederich, P. B.
(1974). Measuring growth in English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5.
Finlayson, D.
(1951). The reliability of marking essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 126-134.
6.
Follman, J. C.
, & Anderson J. (1967). An investigation of the reliability of five procedures for grading English themes. Research in the Teaching of English, 1, 190-200.
7.
Freedman, S.
(1981). Influences on evaluators of expository essays: Beyond the text. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 245-255.
8.
Gorrell, D.
(1983). Toward determining a minimal competency entrance examination for freshman composition and communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 263-274.
9.
Klien, S.
, & Hart, F. (1968). Chance and systematic factors affecting essay grades. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 197-206.
10.
Lloyd-Jones, R.
(1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. Cooper & L. Odell Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging, Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
11.
Lyman, R. L.
(1929). Summary of investigations relating to grammar, language, and composition. Chicago, IL. The University of Chicago.
12.
Quellmalz, E.et al.
(1981). Studies on test design: Annual report. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California at Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 212 650)
13.
Winters, L.
(1979). Alternative scoring for predicting criterion group membership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, April 8-12, 1979. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 211)
14.
Witte, S.
, Meyer, P. R., Miller, T., & Faigley, L. (1981). A national survey of college and university writing program directors; Technical report 2. Austin, TX: Writing Assessment Project, University of Texas, August 31, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 210 709)
