The primary hypothesis was that field independent subjects would produce discourse that would be judged more coherent than the discourse of field dependent subjects. A total of 44 subjects in their first term of college composition were selected from a group of 60 volunteers from two universities and a community college. Each subject was administered the Culture Fair Intelligence Test, the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, and the Group Embedded Figures Test. There were five research conditions: Three evoked oral responses, and one evoked a written response. A group of readers unaware of the nature of the research evaluated each response holistically, rating it in terms of a coherence scale. Coherence scores were then analyzed in relation to cognitive style classification. The primary hypothesis was supported by the data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant cognitive style effect, F(6,25) = 4.82, p <.0001. The correlation between cognitive style and coherence was significant, r(32) = .54, p <.002. The results suggest that cognitive style is a significant variable in explaining differences between good writers and poor ones.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, A.
(1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bamberg, B.
(1983). What makes a text coherent?College Composition and Communication, 34, 417-429.
3.
Bamberg, B.
(1984). Assessing coherence: A reanalysis of essays written for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1969-1979. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 305-319.
4.
Bates, E.
(1976). Language and context. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Benton, S.
, Kraft, R., Glover, J., & Plake, B. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences among writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 820-834.
6.
Bieri, J.
(1969). Category width as a measure of discrimination. Journal of Personality, 37, 513-521.
7.
Bransford, J.
, & Johnson, M. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
8.
Bransford, J.
, & Johnson, M. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Britton, J.
(1975). The development of writing abilities (11-18). London: Macmillan.
10.
Clark, H.
, & Haviland, S. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Coates, S.
(1975). Field independence and intellectual functioning in pre-school children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1, 30-40.
12.
DiVesta, F.
(1973). Theories and measures of individual differences in studies of trait by treatment interaction. Educational Psychologist, 10, 67-75.
13.
Fahnestock, J.
(1983). Semantic and lexical coherence. College Composition and Communication, 34, 400-416.
14.
Ferrara, A.
(1980). An extended theory of speech acts: Appropriateness conditions for subordinate acts in sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 232-252.
15.
Flavel, J.
, Botkin, P., Fry, C., Wright, J., & Jarvis, P. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. (1981). The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 229-243.
17.
Gardner, R.
& Schoen, R. (1962). Differentiation and abstraction in concept formation. Psychological Monographs, 76 (41, Whole No. 560).
18.
Glow, R. A.
, Lange, R., Glow, P. H., & Barnett, J. (1983). Cognitive and self-reported impulsiveness: Comparison of Kagan's MFFT and Eysenck's EPQ impulsiveness measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 179-187.
19.
Green, G.
, & Morgan, J. (1982). Pragmatics, grammar, and discourse. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Grice, P.
(1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
Gumperz, J.
(1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Halliday, W.
, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
23.
Hirsch, E.
(1977). The philosophy of composition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Hobbs, J.
(1978). Why is discourse coherent? (Technical note #176, SRI Projects 5844, 7500, and 7910). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
25.
Hunt, E.
, & Poltrock, S. (1974). The mechanics of thought. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Kagan, J.
& Kogan, N. (1970). Individual variation in cognitive processes. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Kates, C.
(1980). Pragmatics and semantics: An empiricist theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Kogan, N.
(1976). Cognitive styles in infancy and early childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Learner, K.
, & Richman, C. (1984). The effect of modifying the cognitive tempo of reading disabled children on reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 122-134.
30.
Markels, R.
(1984). A new perspective on cohesion in expository paragraphs. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
31.
Messer, S.
(1975). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Unpublished manuscript.
32.
Messick, S.
(1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick and associates (Eds.), Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Olson, D.
(1981). Writing: The divorce of the author from the text. In Exploring speaking/writing relationships. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
34.
Oltman, P.
, Raskin, E., & Witkin, H. (1971). Group embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
35.
Phelps, L.
(1985). Dialectics of coherence: Toward an integrative theory. College English, 47, 12-29.
36.
Piaget, J.
(1974). The language and thought of the child. (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: New American Library.
37.
Robinson, A.
(1978). Investigating the process of natural language communication. (SRI technical note #165). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
38.
Rose, M.
(1984) Writer's block. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
39.
Sabsay, S.
, & Foster, S. (1981). Topics and conversation. Unpublished manuscript.
40.
Sacks, H.
(1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt.
41.
Sacks, H.
, Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
42.
Scardamalia, M.
(1982). How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing. In C. Frederiksen & J. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Scott, W.
(1974). Varieties of cognitive integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 563-578.
44.
Searle, J.
(1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Thorndyke, P.
(1976). The role of inferences in discourse comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 437-446.
46.
Tierney, R.
, & Mosenthal, J. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215-230.
47.
van Dijk, T.
(1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Williams, J. D. (1983). Coherence and cognitive style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
49.
Williams, J. D.
, & Alden, S. (1983). Motivation in the composition class. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 101-112.
50.
Witkin, H.
, Lewis, H., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception. New York: Harper & Row.
51.
Witkin, H.
, Dyk, R., Faterson, H., Goodenough, D., & Karp, S. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: John Wiley.
52.
Witte, S.
, & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189-204.
53.
Yando, R.
, & Kagan, J. (1968) The effect of teacher tempo on the child. Child Development, 39, 27-34.
