At least seven types of summaries have emerged in common usage, especially during the past 250 years. They may be classified as either sequential summaries that retain the original order in which information was presented or synthesizing summaries that alter this sequence to achieve specific objectives. Each type of summary developed in response to challenges facing professions, government, business, and ordinary citizens-all of whom have sought to absorb increasing quantities of information being generated in a society that is becoming more complex. This taxonomy offers a definition and brief history for each of the seven techniques, describes the growth of corporations or other organizations that can be considered leading practitioners, and comments on the potential continuing role for each type of summary. The article also focuses on several contemporary issues that will affect future research, classroom writing instruction, and information management in modern computerized offices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, L. G.
(1980). Sixty steps to précis. London: Longmans.
2.
APA
(1965). Reports of the American Psychological Association's project on scientific information exchange in psychology (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
Borko, H.
, & Bernier, C. L. (1975). Abstracting concepts and methods. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Brewer, A. M.
(1982). Indexes, abstracts and digests. Detroit: Gale Research.
5.
Brinberg, H. R.
(1984). Effective management of information: How to meet the needs of all users. Management Review, 73(2), 8-13.
6.
Brown, A. L.
, & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
7.
Brown, A. L.
, Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
8.
BNA
(1979). The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 1929-1979, 50th Anniversary. (A company brochure). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
9.
BNA
(1982). Catalog of information services. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
10.
Century dictionary and encyclopedia (Vol. I). (1911). New York: Century Co.
11.
Collison, R.
(1971). Abstracts and abstracting services. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
12.
D'Angelo, K.
(1983). Précis writing: Promoting vocabulary development and comprehension. Journal of Reading, 20, 534-539.
13.
Dennis, G. W.
, & Sharp, D. W. H. (1966). The art of summary. London: Longmans.
14.
Dinwoodey, D.
(1957, March 6-9). The BNA story. The Christian Science Monitor.
15.
Flower, L.
(1981). Problem-solving strategies for writing (chap. 7). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16.
Graetz, N.
(1982). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Language for Special Purposes, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. (ERIC document No. 224 327).
17.
Granick, L.
(1983). Excerpt from speech at Western Psychological Association's April meeting in San Francisco, California.
18.
Guinn, D. M.
(1979). Composing an abstract: A practical heuristic. College Composition and Communication, 30, 380-383.
19.
Hayakawa, S. I.
(1972). Language in thought and action (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20.
Holdsworth, W. S.
(1941). Law reporting in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: New York University School of Law.
21.
Institute of Office Management
(1970). The development of shorthand. Office Management (London), 24, 87-95.
22.
Jackson, R. M.
(1967). The machinery of justice in England (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Jencke, G. E.
(1935). A study of précis writing as a composition technique. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
24.
Johnston, R.
(1869). Civil service précis. London: Longmans, Green.
25.
Kintsch, W.
, & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
26.
Leonard, A. W.
, & Fuess, C. M. (1929). Practical précis writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27.
Malclès, L.
(1956). In T. Hines, (Trans., 1961). Bibliography. New York: Scarecrow Press.
28.
Manzer, B. M.
(1977). The abstract journal, 1790-1920: Origin, development and diffusion. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
29.
Martin, N.
(1984, April 23). BNA employee/shareholders reject proposals to ease takeover. Washington Business Section, The Washington Post, p. 3.
30.
Matsuhashi, A.
, & Quinn, K. (1984). Cognitive questions from discourse analysis. Written Communication, 1, 307-339.
31.
OTA
(1982). MEDLARS and health information policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment.
32.
Ratteray, O.
(1983). A summary is worth a hundred pages: How to say more with less. The Secretary, 43, (8), 5-7.
33.
Ratteray, O.
(1984a). Congressional testimony: Who testifies and at what cost. Washington, DC: Idea Management Associates.
34.
Ratteray, O.
(1984b). Summarize information to get a grip on time. Office Systems '84, 1, (4), 14-16.
35.
Rayne, A.
(1976). Précis writing: An approach to basic composition. College Composition and Communication, 27, 403-406.
36.
Reader's Digest Association (1983). Background on Reader's Digest Association, Inc. (A typewritten company fact sheet).
37.
Reid, J. M.
(1982). The process of composition (chap. 8). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
38.
Rorabacher, L.
, & Dunbar, G. (1982). Assignments in exposition (7th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
39.
Schoenheimer, H. P.
, Ganderton, W., & Campbell, R. M. (1965). Summary: Précis with a purpose. London: Ginn.
40.
Schrage, M.
(1984, October 7). McGraw-Hill aims to blend print, computer. The Washington Post, p. F1, col. 4.
41.
Shaw, H.
(1981). The Harper handbook of college composition (5th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
42.
Skerry, G. E.
(1901). Skerry's advanced indexing and précis writing (Part 2). London: Messrs. G. E. Skerry.
43.
Smeltzer, L.
, & Golen, S. (1984). Transmission and retrieval of information: Statements and hypotheses for research. Journal of Business Communication, 21, 81-91.
44.
Taylor, K. K.
(1983). Can college students summarize?Journal of Reading, 26, 524-528.
45.
Taylor, K. K.
(1984). The different summary skills of inexperienced and professional writers. Journal of Reading, 27, 691-699.
46.
Watson, F.
(Ed.). (1922). Précis writing, How to teach. The encyclopedia and dictionary of education. (Vol. 3, pp. 1330-1331). London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
47.
Webster's new international dictionary of the English language (2nd. ed.). (1953). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
48.
Webster's third new international dictionary. (1976). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
49.
West's law finder: A research manual for lawyers. (1982). St. Paul: West Publishing.
50.
Winograd, P. N.
(1984, Summer). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.
