Two studies based on an information theory model of reader enjoyment investigated the role of syntactic and semantic unpredictability in determining readers' evaluations of journalistic prose. In each study, reader enjoyment ratings for a set of articles reporting a single news event were compared with cloze procedure results in which function-word and content-word responses were analyzed separately using entropy and cloze scoring techniques. Both studies revealed a statistically significant correlation between function-word predictability and reader enjoyment. In addition, a strong correlation between content-word unpredictability and reader enjoyment in one study supported the notion that readers prefer texts that are characterized by a high degree of semantic unpredictability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anscombe, F.J.
(1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. American Statistician, 27, 17-21.
2.
Atkin, C.
(1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P. Clark (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 205-239). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Berlo, D. K.
(1977). Communication as process: Review and commentary. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 11-28). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4.
Clark, H. H.
, & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5.
Cofer, C. N.
, & Appley, M. H. (1967). Motivation: Theory and research. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Conover, W.J.
, & Iman, R.L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, 124-133.
7.
Dale, E.
, and Chall, J. S. (1948, January). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20, 28.
8.
Donohew, R. L.
, Nair, M., & Finn, S. (1984). Automaticity, arousal, and information exposure. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8. (pp. 267-284). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Donohew, L.
, Palmgreen, P., & Duncan, J. (1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 37, 225-303.
10.
Finn, H. S. (1983). An information theory approach to reader enjoyment of print journalism (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2481A-2482A.
11.
Finn, S.
(in press). Measuring readability for the fluent newsreader. Journalism Quarterly.
12.
Finn, S.
, & Roberts, D. F. (1984). Source, destination, and entropy: Reassessing the role of information theory in communication research. Communication Research, 11, 453-476.
13.
Flesch, R.
(1948). The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Row.
14.
Funkhouser, G. R.
, & Maccoby, N. (1971). Communicating specialized science information to a lay audience. Journal of Communication, 21, 58-71.
15.
Haber, L. R.
, & Haber, R. N. (1981). Perceptual processes in reading: An analysis by synthesis approach. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 167-200). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Hebb, D. O.
(1955). Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychological Review, 62, 243-254.
17.
Kintsch, W.
, & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L-G Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
LaBerge, D.
, & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
19.
Madsen, K. B.
(1968). Theories of motivation. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
20.
Moles, A.
(1966). Information theory and esthetic perception (J. Cohen, Trans.), Urbana. University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1958)
21.
Samuels, S. J.
, & P. Eisenberg (1981) A framework for understanding the reading process. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 31-67). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Shannon, C. E.
(1949). The mathematical theory of communication. In C. E. Shannon & W. Weaver (Eds.), The mathematical theory of communication (pp. 29-125). Urbana. University of Illinois Press.
23.
Shannon, C. E.
(1951). Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, 30, 50-64.
24.
Taylor, W. L.
(1953). `Cloze procedure': A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
25.
Taylor, W. L.
(1955). Application of `cloze' and entropy measures to the study of contextual constraint in samples of continuous prose. Dissertation Abstracts, 15, 464-465. (University Microfilms No. 10,554)
26.
Taylor, W. L.
(1956). Recent developments in the use of cloze procedure. Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42-48.
