Rubin, Piché, Michlin, and Johnson (1984) recently presented data allegedly demonstrating a substantial relationship between social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill. Certain theoretical and statistical considerations led us to suspect that the claimed relationship was not actually present in the data reported by Rubin et al. Consequently, two empirical studies were conducted to test for the hypothesized relationship between social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill, one study reanalyzing data reported by Rubin et al. and the second analyzing original data. The results of the two studies indicate no relationship between social-cognitive ability and rated quality of narrative essays. These findings are discussed in terms of a theoretical model of the relationships among cognitive abilities, discourse aims, and discourse models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applegate, J. L.
(1982). The impact of construct system development on communication and impression formation in persuasive contexts. Communication Monographs, 49, 277-286.
2.
Applegate, J. L.
, Burke, J. A., Burleson, B. R., Delia, J. G., & Kline, S. L. (in press). Reflection-enhancing parental communication. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Beach, R.
, & Eaton, S. (1984). Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 149-170). New York: Guilford.
4.
Britton, J.
, Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (pp. 11-18). London: Macmillan.
5.
Burleson, B. R.
(1982). The affective perspective-taking process: A test of Turiel's role-taking model. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook VI (pp. 473-488). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Burleson, B. R.
(1984). Role-taking and communication skills in childhood: Why they aren't related and what can be done about it. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 155-170.
7.
Burleson, B. R.
(in press). Comforting communication. In H. W. Sypher & J. L. Applegate (Eds.), Communication by children and adults: Social cognitive and strategic processes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Burleson, B. R.
, Applegate, J. L., & Neuwirth, C. M. (1981). Is cognitive complexity loquacity? A reply to Powers, Jordan, and Street. Human Communication Research, 7, 212-225.
9.
Cohen, J.
, & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Cooper, C. R.
, & Odell, L. (1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 3-31). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
11.
Crockett, W. H.
(1965). Cognitive complexity and impression formation. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 2, pp 47-90). New York: Academic.
12.
Crockett, W. H.
, Press, A. N., Delia, J. G., & Kenny, C. T. (1974). The structural analysis of the organization of written impressions. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas.
13.
Delia, J. G.
(1972). Dialects and the effects of stereotypes on interpersonal attraction and cognitive processes in impression formation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, 285-297.
14.
Delia, J. G.
, Clark, R. A., & Switzer, D. E. (1974). Cognitive complexity and impression formation in informal social interaction. Speech Monographs, 41, 299-308.
15.
Delia, J. G.
, & Crockett, W. H. (1973). Social schemas, cognitive complexity, and the learning of social structures. Journal of Personality, 41, 413-429.
16.
Delia, J. G.
, O'Keefe, B. J., & O'Keefe, D. J. (1982). The constructivist approach to human communication. In F.E.X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory (pp. 147-191). New York: Harper & Row.
17.
Diederich, P. B.
(1974). Measuring growth in English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
18.
Enright, R. D.
, & Lapsley, D. K. (1980). Social role-taking: A review of the constructs, measures, and measurement properties. Review of Educational Research, 50, 647-674.
19.
Feffer, M. H.
(1959). The cognitive implications of role taking behavior. Journal of Personality, 27, 152-168.
20.
Hale, C. L.
, & Delia, J. G. (1976). Cognitive complexity and social perspective-taking. Communication Monographs, 43, 195-203.
21.
Kantor, K. J.
, & Rubin, D. L. (1981). Between speaking and writing: Processes of differentiation. In B. M. Kroll & R. J. Vann, (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts (pp. 55-81). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22.
Kinneavy, J. L.
(1971). A theory of discourse. New York: Norton.
23.
Kinneavy, J. L.
, Cope, J. Q., & Campbell, J. W. (1976). Writing—Basic modes of organization. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
24.
Kroll, B. M.
(1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269-281.
25.
Kroll, B. M.
(1981). Developmental relationships between speaking and writing. In B. M. Kroll & R. J. Vann (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts (pp. 32-54). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
26.
McNemar, Q.
(1969). Psychological statistics (4th. ed.). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Moffett, J.
(1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
Nidorf, L. J.
, & Crockett, W. H. (1965). Cognitive complexity and the organization of impressions of others. Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 165-169.
29.
O'Keefe, B. J.
, & Delia, J. G. (1979). Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and appeals in a persuasive message. Communication Monographs, 46, 231-240.
30.
O'Keefe, D. J.
, & Delia, J. G. (1981). Cognitive complexity and the relationship of attitudes and behavioral intentions. Communication Monographs, 48, 146-157.
31.
O'Keefe, D. J.
, & Sypher, H. E. (1981). Cognitive complexity measures and the relationship of cognitive complexity to communication: A critical review. Human Communication Research, 8, 72-92.
32.
Rubin, D. L.
(1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1, 211-245.
33.
Rubin, D. L.
, Piché, G. L., Michlin, M. L., & Johnson, F. L. (1984). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of fourth-graders' written narratives. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 297-307). New York: Guilford.
34.
Shantz, C. U.
(1975). The development of social cognition. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5, pp. 257-323). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Shantz, C. U.
(1981). The role of role-taking in children's referential communication. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 85-102). New York: Academic.
36.
Sypher, H. E.
, & Applegate, J. L. (1982). Cognitive complexity and verbal intelligence: Clarifying relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 537-543.
37.
Windhover, R.
(1982). A holistic pedagogy for freshman composition. In R. A. Sudol (Ed.), Revising: New essays for teachers of writing (pp. 87-99). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
