We are often suspicious of professional writers' comments about their composing processes because of the aspect of “literary performance.” But we should be equally wary of the accounts of student writers, since they are also unlikely to be veridical. Reasonable, coherent, even captivating accounts are limited by problems of attendance, memory, and reporting, and may be based not on recall but on other cognitive processes. However, despite these problems, retrospective accounts may still prove valuable in studying the writing process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arkin, S.
(1983). Composing the self: The literacy interview as form. International Journal of Oral History, 4, (1), 12-18.
2.
Atwood, M.
(1976). Margaret Atwood. A conversation with Margaret Atwood (M. E. Gibson, interviewer). Chicago Review, 27, (4), 105-113.
3.
Berkenkotter, C.
(1983). Decisions and revisions: The planning strategies of a publishing writer. College Composition and Communication, 34, 156-169.
4.
Cicourel, A.
(1964). Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Clarke, A.
(1972). Austin Clarke (G. Gibson, interviewer). In Eleven Canadian novelists (pp. 33-54). Toronto: Anansi.
6.
Cooper, C. R.
, & Matsuhashi, A. (1983). A theory of the writing process. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language (pp. 3-39). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Dexter, L. A.
(1970). Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
8.
Dorn, E.
(1980). In Donald Allen (Ed.), Interviews: Edward Dorn. (Roy K. Okada, interviewer). Bolinas, CA: Four Seasons Foundation.
9.
Emig, J.
(1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
10.
Ericsson, K. A.
, & Simon, H. A. (1981). Sources of evidence on cognition: A historical overview. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 16-51). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
12.
Gass, W.
(1976). A conversation with Stanley Elkin and William H. Gass (J. L. Duncan, interviewer). Iowa Review, 7 (1).
13.
Genest, M.
, & Turk, D. C. (1981). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.) Cognitive assessment (pp. 233-269). New York: Guilford Press.
14.
Hall, D.
(1973). Here where no one has ever been: An interview with Donald Hall (G. Fitzgerald and R. Parshall, interviewers). The Falcon, 4 (7), 5-16.
15.
Hayden, R.
(1973). Robert Hayden (J. O'Brien, interviewer). In Interviews with black writers (pp. 109-123). New York: Liveright.
16.
Hyman, H.
, Cobb, W. J., & Stouffer, S. A. (1970). Interviewing in social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Murray, D.
(1983). Response of a laboratory rat—or, being protocoled. College Composition and Communication, 34, 169-172.
18.
Nisbett, R. E.
, & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
19.
Oates, J. C.
(1978). Joyce Carol Oates. The art of fiction 72; Paris Review, (74), 203-205.
20.
Rose, M.
(1984). Writer's block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
Ross, L.
(1978). Shortcomings of the intuitive psychologist. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Cognitive theories in social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Ross, L.
(1978). Some after thoughts on the intuitive psychologists. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Cognitive theories in social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Rothenberg, J.
(1974). In W. Packard (Ed.), The craft of poetry: Craft interviews from the New York Quarterly (M. J. Fortunato, interviewer). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
24.
Smith, E. R.
, & Miller, F. D. (1978). Limits on perception of cognitive process: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson. Psychological Review, 85, 355-362.
25.
Stone, R.
(1975). Interview with Ruth Stone (S. Gilbert, interviewer)California Quarterly, (10), 56-67.
26.
Tomlinson, B.The interpretive reality of the composing process: Notes toward the study of writers' retrospective accounts. Article submitted for publication.
27.
Turner, A. G.
(Ed.) (1977). James Baker Hall: “The Song of the New Mean Mary Jean Machine.” In Fifty contemporary poets: The creative process (pp. 133-139). New York: David McKay Co.
28.
Wager, W.
, (1967). The playwright speaks. New York: Delacorte Press.
29.
White, P.
(1980). Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem. Psychological Review, 87, 107-112.
30.
Zimmerman, D.
, & Pollmer, M. (1970). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 80-103). Chicago: Alden Pub. Co.
