This study attempted to describe the structural and content characteristics of actual employment rejection letters (following job screening interviews). Their impact on applicants' feelings about themselves (self-concept and self-satisfaction) and about letters (perceptions of letter clarity, “personalness” and appreciative tone) are assessed. Results provide a profile of the “typical” rejection letter and indicate that while few of the letter characteristics affected applicants' feelings about themselves, a number of these attributes were related to applicants' perceptions of the letters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C.P.
, & McCord, C.G. (1970). Personal and situational factors in the recruitment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 377-385.
2.
Arvey, R.D.
, & Campion, J.E. (1982). The employment screening interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
3.
Blumberg, H.H.
(1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 157-162.
4.
Eisenberg, A.
(1982). Effective technical communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Fielden, J.S.
, & Dulek, R. (1982). What rejection letters say about your company. Business Horizons, 25, 40-45.
6.
Fisher, C.D.
(1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 533-540.
7.
Fisher, C.D.
, Ilgen, D.R., & Hoyer, W.D. (1979). Source credibility, information favorability, and job offer acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 94-103.
8.
Himstreet, W.C.
, & Baty, W.M. (1981). Business communication principles and methods. Boston: Kent Publishing Co.
9.
Huseman, R.C.
, Lahiff, J.M., & Hatfield, J.D., (1981). Business communication strategies and skills. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
10.
Jablin, F.M.
, & McComb, K.B. (1984). The employment screening interview: Organizational assimilation and communication. In R.N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Lesikar, R.V.
(1982). Business communication theory and application. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
12.
Schmitt, N.
, & Coyle, B.W. (1976). Applicant decisions in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 184-192.
13.
Shrauger, J.S.
(1975). Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 581-596.
14.
Shrauger, J. S.
, & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of selfconcept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573.
15.
Sigband, N.B.
(1982). Communication for management and business. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
16.
Tesser, A.
, & Rosen, S. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Treece, M.
(1983). Communication for business and the professions. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
Wanous, J.P.
(1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Wolf, M.P.
, & Aurner, R.R. (1974). Effective communication in business. Dallas: Southwestern Publishing Co.
