This study uses protocol analysis techniques to compare written evaluations of college freshmen with those of instructors in Freshmen English sections. These evaluations of two students papers indicate that many students apply criteria that are significantly and consistently different from those of instructors. The differences suggest that composition teachers who urge students to “write for their peers” may put themselves in a position of having to reward writing that fails to meet basic expectations of academic audiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applebee, A.
(1981). Writing in the secondary school: English and the content areas. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2.
Barnet, S.
& Stubbs, M. (1980). Practical guide to writing (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
3.
Cowan, G.
& Cowan, E. (1980). Writing. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Diederich, P.
, French, S., & Carlton, S. (1961). Factors in the judgment of writing ability (Research Bulletin 61-15). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5.
Elbow, P.
(1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Elbow, P.
(1981). Writing with power. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Fish, S.
(1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Freedman, A.
& Pringle, I. (1981). Writing in the college years: Some indices of growth. College Composition and Communication, 31 (3), 311-324.
9.
Freedman, S.
(1979). How characteristics of student essays influence teachers' evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (3), 328-338.
10.
Hake, R.
& Williams, J. (1981). Style and its consequences: Do as I say and not as I do. College English, 43 (5), 433-451.
11.
Macrorie, K.
(1970). Telling writing. Rochelle Park, NJ: Hayden.
12.
Memering, D.
& O'Hare, F. (1980). The writer's work: Guide to effective composition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Moffett, J.
(1969). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Perry, W.
(1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
Robins, A.
(1980). The writer's practical rhetoric. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Scott, W.
& Wertheimer, M. (1962). Introduction to psychological research. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Shaughnessy, M.
(1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Squire, J.
(1964). The responses of adolescents while reading four short stories. Champagne, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
