Aristotle
(1975). The art of rhetoric. (J. H. Freese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bator, P.
(1980). Aristotelian and Rogerian rhetoric. College Composition and Communication, 31, 427-432.
3.
Berlin, J. A.
(1980). Current-traditional rhetoric: Paradigm and practice. Freshman English News, 8, 1-14.
4.
Berlin, J. A.
(1980b). The rhetoric of romanticism. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 1980, 10, 62-75.
5.
Bitzer, L.
(1959) Aristotle's enthymeme revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45, 399-408.
6.
Booth, W.
(1974). Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
7.
Bracewell, R.
, Frederiksen, C., & Frederiksen, J. (1982). Cognitive processes in composing and comprehending discourse. Educational Psychologist, 17, 146-164.
8.
Brockriede, W. E.
(1966). Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 52, 33-40.
9.
Burke, K.
(1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Burke, K.
(1966a). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published 1945)
11.
Burke, K.
(1969b). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published 1950)
12.
Clark, H.
, & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
13.
Collins, A.
(1977). Inferences and text understanding. (ERIC ED 150547.)
14.
Conley, T. M.
(1979). The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 74-92.
15.
Connors, R.
(1981). The rise and fall of the modes of discourse. College Composition and Communication, 32, 444-455.
16.
De Beaugrande, R.
(1981). Design criteria for process models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 261-315.
17.
Dewey, J.
(1927). The public and its problem. Chicago: Swallow Press.
18.
Dewey, J.
(1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.
19.
Dewey, J.
(1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.
20.
Dewey, J.
(1960). Theory of the moral life. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21.
Dillon, G.
(1981). Constructing texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
Ehninger, D.
(1950). George Campbell and the revolution in inventional theory. Southern Speech Journal, 15, 270-276.
23.
Ehninger, D.
(1963). Campbell, Blair, and Whately revisited. Southern Speech Journal, 28, 169-182.
24.
Ehninger, D.
(1972). On systems of rhetoric. In D. Ehninger (Ed.), Contemporary rhetoric: A reader's coursebook. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. (Originally published 1968)
25.
Ehninger, D.
(1975). A synoptic view of systems of western rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 448-453.
26.
Emig, J.
(1978). Hand, eye, brain: Some “basics” in the writing process. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
27.
Fish, S.
(1980). Is there a text in this class?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Flower, L.
, and Hayes, J. R. (1980a). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32.
29.
Flower, L.
, & Hayes, J. R. (1980b). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Fogarty, D.
(1959). Roots for a new rhetoric. New York: Russell and Russell.
31.
Grimaldi, W.M.A.
(1972). Studies in the philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric. Wiesbaden, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
32.
Grimaldi, W.M.A.
(1980). Aristotle, Rhetoric I, a commentary. New York: Fordham University Press.
33.
Hacking, I.
(1975). Why does language matter to philosophy?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1978). Language as social semiotic. Baltimore: University Park Press.
35.
Halloran, M.
(1982). Rhetoric in the American college curriculum: The decline of public discourse. Pre/Text, 3, 245-270.
36.
Halloran, S. M.
(1975). On the end of rhetoric, classical and modern. College English36, 621-631.
37.
Halloran, S. M.
(1976). Tradition and theory in rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 234-241.
38.
Hamilton, E.
, & Carins, H. (Eds. and Trans.). (1961). Collected dialogues of Plato. New York: Random House.
39.
Horner, W.
(Ed.). (1983). The present state of scholarship in historical and contemporary rhetoric. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
40.
Howell, W. S.
(1971). Eighteenth-century British logic and rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Hughes, R.
(1965). The contemporary of classical rhetoric. College Composition and Communication, 16, 157-159.
42.
Hymes, D.
(1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43.
Johannesen, R. L.
(1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 373-382.
44.
Johnstone, C. L.
(1980). An Aristotelian trilogy: Ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for moral truth. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 13, 1-24.
45.
Kinneavy, J.
(1971). A theory of discourse. New York: Norton.
46.
Leff, M.
(1978). In search of Ariadne's thread: A review of the recent literature on rhetorical theory. Central States Speech Journal, 29, 73-91.
47.
Lunsford, A.
(1982). Alexander Bain's contribution to discourse theory. College English, 45, 290-301.
48.
Morris, C. W.
(1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Murphy, J. J.
(Ed.). (1982). The rhetorical tradition and modern writing. New York: Modern Language Association.
50.
Ohmann, R.
(1964). In lieu of a new rhetoric. College English, 26, 17-22.
51.
Ong, W.
(1958). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52.
Ong, W.
(1970). The presence of the word: Some prelegomena for cultural and religious history. New York: Simon and Schuster.
53.
Perelman, C.
(1982). The realm of rhetoric (W Kluback, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
54.
Perelman, C.
& Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
55.
Polanyi, M.
(1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Pratt, Mary Louise
(1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57.
Richards, I. A.
(1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Rorty, R.
(Ed.). (1967). The linguistic turn: Recent essays in philosophical method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Rosenblatt, L.
(1968). Literature as exploration. New York: Noble and Noble.
60.
Rosenblatt, L.
(1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.
61.
Rosenfield, L. W.
(1966). Rhetorical criticism and an Aristotelian notion of process. Speech Monographs, 33, 1-16.
62.
Roy, T.
(Ed.). (1974). Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. Baltimore: Penguin.
63.
Scott, R. L.
(1975). A Synoptic view of systems of western rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 439-447.
64.
Simons, H. W.
(1971). Toward a new rhetoric. In R. L. Johannesen(Ed.), Contemporary theories of rhetoric: Selected readings. New York: Harper and Row. (Originally published 1967)
65.
Smith, F.
(1978). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
66.
Stewart, D.
(1982a). Some facts worth knowing about the origins of Freshman Composition. CEA Critic, 44, 2-12. (a)
67.
Stewart, D.
(1982b). Two model teachers and the Harvardization of English departments. In James J. Murphy (Ed.), The rhetorical tradition and modern writing. New York: Modern Language Association.
68.
Strother, D. B.
(1976). Communication and human response: A heuristic view. In J. Blankenship and H. G. Stelznen (Eds.), Rhetoric and communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
69.
Van Dijk, T. A.
, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
70.
Walter, O. M.
(1963). On views of rhetoric: Whether progressive or conservative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 49, 367-382.
71.
Weaver, R. M.
(1953). The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago: H. Regnery Co.
72.
Young, R. E.
(1978). Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on Composing: Points of departure. Urbana, Il: National Council of Teachers of English.
73.
Young, R.
, Becker, A., & Pike, K. (1970). Rhetoric: Discovery and change. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
74.
Zappen, J. P.
(1980). Carl R. Rogers and political rhetoric. Pre/Text, 1, 95-113.
