Teaching linguistic aspects relevant to text construction is an essential component of any thorough writing instruction program, despite the conflicting evidence regarding its effectiveness. In this study, 889 second- and fourth-grade students were assigned to one of three conditions: Self-Regulated Development (SRSD), SRSD-connectors (SRSD-C), and business-as-usual (BAU). The experimental conditions addressed planning and self-regulation strategies to write opinion essays, but only the SRSD condition included explicit teaching of connectors (e.g., because) and discourse markers (e.g., In conclusion). Children in both experimental conditions outscored children in the BAU condition across grades and outcome variables. In addition, the SRSD condition showed larger effect sizes on Grade 2 children’s gains in text quality, number of genre-appropriate elements, and number of connectors than the SRSD-C condition. The study provides evidence of the effectiveness of explicitly teaching functionally motivated linguistic representations within a SRSD program. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.
AlamargotD.ChanquoyL. (2001). General introduction. In AlamargotD.ChanquoyL. (Eds.), Through the models of writing (Vol. 9, pp. 1-29). Studies in Writing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4_1
2.
AndrewsR.TorgersonC.BevertonS.FreemanA.LockeT.LowG.RobinsonA.ZhuD. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401997
3.
Benedek-WoodE.MasonL. H.WoodP. H.HoffmanK. E.McGuireA. (2014). An experimental examination of quick writing in the middle school science classroom. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(1), 69.
4.
BermanR. A.Nir-SagivB. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79-120. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4302_1
5.
BermanR. A.SlobinD. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (Vol. 1). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009016
6.
BermanR. A.VerhoevenL. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber
7.
BerningerV. W.FullerF.WhitakerD. (1996). A process model of writing development across the lifespan. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464073
8.
BrunsteinJ. C.GlaserC. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders’ composition skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 922-938. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024622
9.
CoirierP.GolderC. (1993). Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173160
10.
Cuenca-CarlinoY.MustianA. L. (2013). Self-regulated strategy development: Connecting persuasive writing to self-advocacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 39(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900102
11.
DerewiankaB.JonesP. (2010). From traditional grammar to functional grammar: Bridging the divide. Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers. 1001. https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1001
12.
DuinA. H.GravesM. F. (1987). Intensive vocabulary instruction as a prewriting technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.2307/747971
13.
FearnL.FarnanN. (2007). When is a verb? Using functional grammar to teach writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 26(1), 63-87.
14.
FidalgoR.TorranceM. (2018). Developing writing skills through cognitive self-regulation instruction. In FidalgoR.HarrisK.BraaksmaM. (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 89-118). Brill Editions.
15.
FidalgoR.TorranceM.RamónP. R. (2011). Comparación de dos programas de instrucción estratégica y autorregulada para la mejora de la competencia escrita [Comparison of two strategic and self-regulated instructional programs for improving writing]. Psicothema, 23(4), 672-680.
16.
FidalgoR.TorranceM.RijlaarsdamG.van den BerghH.ÁlvarezM. L. (2015). Strategy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a model benefits 6th grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.004
17.
GanzeboomH. B.De GraafP. M.TreimanD. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B
18.
García-SánchezJ.-N.Fidalgo-RedondoR. (2006). Effects of two types of self-regulatory instruction programs on students with learning disabilities in writing products, processes, and self-efficacy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(3), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035506
19.
Geres-SmithR.MercerS. H.ArchambaultC.BartfaiJ. M. (2019). A preliminary component analysis of self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing in Grades 5 to 7 in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 34(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573517739085
20.
GillespieA.GrahamS. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527238
21.
GillespieA.KiuharaS. A. (2017). SRSD in writing and professional development for teachers: Practice and promise for elementary and middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12140
22.
GlaserC.BrunsteinJ. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.353
25.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). Guilford Press.
26.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2009). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.01277.x
27.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2017). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In FidalgoR.HarrisK. R.BraaksmaM. (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 13-37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_003
28.
GrahamS.HarrisK. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self-regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139-187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
29.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS.HarrisK. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
30.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
31.
HallidayM. A. K.MatthiessenC. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
32.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. Teaching and Learning Writing, BJEP Monograph Series II, 6, 113-135.
33.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2017). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In Fidalgo RedondoR.HarrisK.BraaksmaM. (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 119-151). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_007
34.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S. (1980). Identifying the organisation of writing processes. In GreggL.SternbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (1st ed., pp. 3-30). Erlbaum.
35.
HooverT. M.KubinaR. M.MasonL. H. (2012). Effects of self-regulated strategy development for POW + TREE on high school students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 20(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.640903
36.
JonesS.MyhillD.BaileyT. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
37.
Karmiloff-SmithB. A. (1994). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 29(1), 95-105.
38.
KelloggR. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In LevyC. M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57-71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
40.
LimpoT.AlvesR. A. (2013). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
41.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
42.
López GutiérrezP. (2019). Component analysis of strategy instruction in writing composition: evaluation and instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de León.
MasonL. H.DavisonM. D.HammerC. S.MillerC. A.GluttingJ. J. (2013). Knowledge, writing, and language outcomes for a reading comprehension and writing intervention. Reading and Writing, 26, 1133-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9409-0
45.
MasonL. H.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2011). Self-regulated strategy development for students with writing difficulties. Theory into Practice, 50(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534922
46.
McCutchenD. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
47.
McCutchenD.NortheyM.HerreraB. L.ClarkT. (2022). What’s in a word? Effects of morphologically rich vocabulary instruction on writing outcomes among elementary students. Reading and Writing, 35, 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10184-z
MuthénB.MuthénL. (2017). Mplus. In Van der LindenW. J. (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory: Volume Three: Applications (1st ed., pp. 507-518). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315117430
50.
MyhillD.WatsonA. (2014). The role of grammar in the writing curriculum: A review of the literature. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013514070
51.
MyhillD. A. (2016). Writing conversations: Metalinguistic talk about writing. Bulletin Vals-ASLA, 103, 153-166. https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2868
52.
MyhillD. A.JonesS. M.LinesH.WatsonA. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding, Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640
53.
MyhillD. A.JonesS.WilsonA. (2016). Writing conversations: Fostering metalinguistic discussion about writing. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1106694
54.
MyhillD.A.LinesH.JonesS. M. (2018). Texts that teach: Examining the efficacy of using texts as models. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2018.18.03.07
55.
OlinghouseN. G.LeairdJ. T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z
SalasN.BirelloM.RibasT. (2021). Effectiveness of an SRSD writing intervention for low-and high-SES children. Reading and Writing, 34(7), 1653-1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10103-8
SalasN.SilventeS. (2020). The role of executive functions and transcription skills in writing: A cross-sectional study across 7 years of schooling. Reading and Writing, 33(4), 877-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09979-y
60.
SawyerR. J.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.340
61.
WhitakerD.BerningerV.JohnstonJ.SwansonH. L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translating process. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90016-7
62.
WyseD.AartsB.AndersJ.De GennaroA.DockrellJ.ManyukhinaJ. Y.SingS.TorgersonC. (2022). Grammar and writing in England’s national curriculum. A randomised controlled trial and implementation and process evaluation of englicious. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10144257
