AlexanderP. A.FusenigJ.SchouteE. CSinghA.SunY.van MeertenJ. E. (2023). Confronting the challenges of undergraduates’ argumentation writing in a “Learning How to Learn” course. Written Communication.
2.
Aristotle. (1925). Nicomachean ethics (W. D.Ross, Trans.). In Aristotle: The complete works (p. 2231). RMB.
3.
BackmanY.ReznitskayaA.GardelliV.WilkinsonI. A. G. (2023). Beyond structure: Using the rational force model to assess argumentative writing. Written Communication.
4.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from the Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Alliance for Excellent Education.
5.
Booth OlsonC.MaamuujavU.SteissJ.ChungH. Q. (2023). Examining the impact of a cognitive strategies approach on the argument writing of mainstreamed English learners in secondary school. Written Communication.
De La PazS.LevinD. L.ButlerC. (2023). Addressing an unfulfilled expectation: Teaching students with disabilities to write scientific arguments. Written Communication.
8.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan Company.
9.
DukeN. K.PearsonP. D.StrachanS. L.BillmanA. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In SamuelsS. J.FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51-93). International Reading Association.
10.
FaigleyL.CherryR. D.JolliffeD. A.SkinnerA. M. (1985). Assessing writers’ knowledge and processes of composing. Ablex.
11.
FerrettiR. P. (2023). When the truth doesn’t seem to matter: The affordances of disciplinary argument in the era of post-truth. Written Communication.
12.
FerrettiR. P.FanY. (2016). Argumentative writing. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 301-315). Guilford.
13.
GrabeW.ZhangC. (2013). Reading and writing together: A critical component of English for academic purposes teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 4, 9-24.
14.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2013). The writing of students with LD and a meta-analysis of SRSD writing intervention studies: Redux. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), The handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 405-438). Guilford Press.
15.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Carnegie Corporation.
16.
GutmannA. (1999). Democratic education. Princeton University Press.
17.
HarrisK. R. (2021). SRSD instructional research for students with or at-risk for LD across the content areas: History and reflections. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36, 1-7.
18.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 77-84.
19.
KöymenB.O’MadagainC.DombergA.TomaselloM. (2020). Young children’s ability to produce valid and relevant counterarguments. Child Development, 91, 685-693.
20.
KöymenB.TomaselloM. (2020). The early ontogeny of reason giving. Child Development Perspectives, 14, 215-220.
21.
LemaineG.MacleodR.MulkayM.WeingartP. (2012). Introduction: Problems in the emergence of new disciplines. In LemaineG.MacleodR.MulkayM.WeingartP. (Eds.), Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines (pp. 1-26). Walter de Gruyter.
22.
McIntyreL. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
NewellG. E.BeachR.SmithJ.VanDerHeideJ. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 273-304.
25.
NokesJ. D.De La PazS. (2023). Historical argumentation: Watching historians and teaching youth. Written Communication.
ShanahanT.ShanahanC. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 7-18.
31.
SimonH. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.
32.
ToulminS. (1972). Human understanding. Volume 1: General introduction and Part 1. The collective use and evolution of concepts. Clarendon Press.
33.
ToulminS. (2003a). Return to reason. Harvard University Press.
34.
ToulminS. (2003b). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
35.
UccelliP. (2023). The language demands of analytical reading and writing at school. Written Communication.
36.
VanDerHeideJ.NewellG. E.Wynhoff OlsenA. (2023). Conceptualizing dialogic literary argumentation: Inviting students to take a turn in important conversations. Written Communication.
37.
van EemerenF. H.GarssenB.KrabbeE. C. W.Snoeck HenkemansA. F.VerheijB.WagemansJ. H. M. (2013). Handbook of argumentation theory. Springer.
38.
van EemerenF. H.GrootendorstR. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discourse. Foris.