A disquieting aspect of some contemporary public discourse is its seeming indifference to or abandonment of any pretense to truth. Among other things, unsubstantiated and misleading claims have been made about the efficacy of vaccines and other purported treatments for SARS-COVID, the 2020 U.S. presidential election, and the January 6, 2021, insurrection on the U.S. Capitol. In addition, a spate of legislation restricting classroom discussion and instruction related to race, bias, privilege, and discrimination has been or is pending passage in U.S. state legislatures. These restrictions are antithetical to core functions of education, which are to inculcate the values, virtues, and advanced literacy skills that support democratic deliberation about controversial issues. This article discusses the increasing political polarization and partisan attacks on the processes of education and the threats to liberal democracy posed by this disregard for the truth. In addition, it reviews the cultural and psychological factors that increase our susceptibility to misinformation and presents a perspective about the pursuit of truth that highlights the educational affordances of disciplinary inquiry, democratic deliberation, and reasonable argumentation. The contemporary challenges are manifestations of long-standing political and cultural divisions, and their mitigation will depend on developing communities of informed citizens that are committed to the values and virtues that are foundational to liberal democracy.
AikenW. A. (1942). The story of the eight-year study. Harper and Brothers.
2.
AndersonA. W. (1952). The cloak of respectability: The attackers and their methods. Progressive Education, 29, 66-81.
3.
AppleM. W.BeaneJ. A. (2007). Democratic schools: Lessons in powerful education (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
4.
AppleM. W.BiestaG.BrightD.GirouxH. A.HeffernanA.McLarenP.RiddleS.YeatmanA. (2022). Reflections on contemporary challenges and possibilities for democracy and education. Journal of Educational Administration and History. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2052029
5.
ApplebaumA. (2020). Twilight of democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism. Doubleday.
6.
ArchbaldD. A.NewmannF. M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing: Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
7.
Aristotle. (1926). Art of rhetoric (FreeseJ. H., Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 193. Harvard University Press.
8.
ArendtH. (1968). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
9.
AshbyM. G.LeeP. (1987). Children’s concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In PortalC. (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62-88). Falmer Press.
10.
AyerA. J. (1952). Language, truth, and logic (2nd ed.). Dover Publications.
BeaneJ. A.AppleM. W. (2007). The case for democratic schools. In AppleM. W.BeaneJ. A. (Eds.), Democratic schools: Lessons in powerful education (2nd ed., pp. 5-8, 14-19). Heinemann.
13.
BecherT.TrowlerP. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
14.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from the carnegie corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Alliance for Excellent Education.
15.
BlochM. (1941). The historian’s craft. Vintage Books.
16.
BokS. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Vintage.
17.
BrashierN. M.MarshE. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 499-515.
18.
BrintonA. (1988). Pathos and the “appeal to emotion”: An Aristotelian analysis. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5, 207-219.
19.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In DamonW. (Series Ed.) & LernerR. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical model of human development (pp. 793-828). John Wiley.
20.
BrophyJ. (1992). The de facto national curriculum in U.S. elementary social studies: Critique of a representative example. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 401-447.
21.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
22.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
23.
BrownK.JacksonD. D. (2013). The history and conceptual elements of critical race theory. In BrownK.JacksonD. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 29-42). Routledge.
24.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
25.
BurgessA. G.BurgessJ. P. (2011). Truth. Princeton University Press.
ChinnC. A.BucklandL. A.SamarapungavanA. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141-167.
28.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.HolumA. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6, 38-46.
De La PazS.Monte-SanoC.FeltonM.CroningerR.JacksonC.PiantedosiK. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 31-52.
34.
De La PazS.NokesJ. D. (2020). Strategic processing in history and historical strategy instruction. In DinsmoreD. L.FryerL. K.ParkinsonM. M (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 195-217). Routledge.
35.
De La PazS.WissingerD. R.GrossM.ButlerC. (2022). Strategies that promote historical reasoning and contextualization: A pilot intervention with urban high school students. Reading and Writing, 35(2), 353-376.
36.
DePauloB. M.KashyD. A.KirkendolS. E.WyerM. M.EpsteinJ. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
37.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan Company.
38.
DeweyJ. (1950). The Child and the curriculum and the school and society. University of Chicago, (reprint ed. 1956).
FahnestockJ.SecorM. (1991). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In BazermanC.ParadisJ. (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. (pp. 77-96). University of Wisconsin Press.
44.
FerrettiR. P.Andrews-WeckerlyS.LewisW. E. (2007). Improving the argumentative writing of students with learning disabilities: Descriptive and normative considerations. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 267-285.
45.
FerrettiR. P.De La PazS. (2011). On the comprehension and production of written texts: Instructional activities that support content-area literacy. In O’ConnorR.VadasyP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 326-355). Guilford.
46.
FerrettiR. P.FanY. (2016). Argumentative writing. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 301-315). Guilford.
47.
FerrettiR. P.GrahamS. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1345-1357.
48.
FerrettiR. P.LewisW. E. (2019). Teaching argumentative writing. In GrahamS.MacArthurC. A.HebertM. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed., pp. 135-161). Guilford.
49.
FerrettiR. P.OkoloC. M. (1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 450-460.
50.
FonerE. (2019). The second founding: How the civil war and reconstruction remade the constitution. W.W. Norton & Company.
51.
FeyerabendP. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). Verso.
52.
FlowerL. (2008). Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement. SIU Press.
53.
FlowerL. (2016). Difference-driven inquiry: A working theory of local public deliberation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46, 308-330.
54.
FlynnD. J.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127-150.
55.
FrankfurtH. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton University Press.
56.
FrankfurtH. G. (2006). On truth. Alfred A. Knopf.
57.
GilbertD.T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
HamiltonA. (2012). The Federalist No. 68. Dutton/Signet.
64.
HarrisK.RayA. B.GrahamS.HoustonJ. (2019). Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th grade students experiencing writing difficulties. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1459-1482.
65.
HarrisK. R. (2021). SRSD instructional research for students with or at-risk for LD across the content areas: History and reflections. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36, 1-7.
66.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 77-84.
67.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MacArthurC.ReidR.MasonL. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187-202). Routledge.
68.
HarryB.KlingerJ. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?Teachers College Press.
KöymenB.MammenM.TomaselloM. (2016). Preschoolers use common ground in their justificatory reasoning with peers. Developmental Psychology, 52, 423-429.
83.
KöymenB.O’MadagainC.DombergA.TomaselloM. (2020). Young children’s ability to produce valid and relevant counterarguments. Child Development, 91, 685-693.
84.
KöymenB.TomaselloM. (2020). The early ontogeny of reason giving. Child Development Perspectives, 14, 215-220.
85.
KridelC.BulloughR. V.Jr. (2012). Stories of the eight-year study: Reexamining secondary education in America. State University of New York Press.
86.
KrishnanA. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. National Centre for Research Methods. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/783/
87.
KuczynskiL.KochanskaG. (1990). Development of children’s noncompliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 26, 398-408.
88.
KuhnD. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
89.
KuhnD.CrowellA. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545-552.
90.
KuhnD.HembergerL.KhaitV. (2016). Tracing the development of argumentative writing in a discourse-rich environment. Written Communication, 33, 92-121.
91.
KuhnD.MooreW. (2015) Argumentation as core curriculum. Learning: Research and Practice, 1, 66-78.
92.
LearsJ. (2009). Rebirth of a nation: The making of modern America, 1877-1920. Harper Collins Publishers.
LevinK. M. (2019). Searching for Black Confederates: The Civil War’s Most Persistent Myth. UNC Press Books.
95.
LevineT. R.KimR. K.HamelL. M. (2010). People lie for a reason: Three experiments documenting the principle of veracity. Communication Research Reports, 27, 271-285.
96.
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How democracies die. Crown Publishing.
97.
LewisW. E.FerrettiR. P. (2009). Defending interpretations of literary texts: The effects of topoi instruction on the literary arguments of high school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25, 250-270.
98.
LewisW. E.FerrettiR. P. (2011). Topoi and literary interpretation: The effects of a critical reading and writing intervention on high school students’ analytic literary essays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 334-354.
MarshallJ. (2000). Research on response to literature. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 381-402). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
101.
McIntyreL. (2018). Post-truth. The MIT Press.
102.
Monte-SanoC.De La PazS.FeltonM. (2014a). Implementing a disciplinary-literacy curriculum for US history: Learning from expert middle school teachers in diverse classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 540-575.
103.
Monte-SanoC.De La PazS.FeltonM. (2014a). Reading, thinking, and writing about history: Teaching argument writing to diverse learners in the common core classroom, Grades 6-12. Teachers College Press.
104.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2017). The writing framework for the national assessment of educational progress. U.S. Department of Education.
105.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
106.
NewmanA. (2017). Review ofThe political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 24, 282-285.
107.
NokesJ.De La PazS. (2018). Writing and argumentation in history education. In MetzgerS. A.HarrisL. M. (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 551-578). John Wiley & Sons.
108.
NokesJ. D. (2017). Exploring patterns of historical thinking through eighth-grade students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8, 437-467.
109.
NussbaumM. C. (2013). Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
110.
OlsonD. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge University Press.
111.
OlsonD. R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge University Press.
112.
OsgoodR. L. (2005). The history of inclusion in the United States. Gallaudet University Press.
PachurT.HertwigR.SteinmannF. (2012). How do people judge risks: Availability heuristic, affect heuristic, or both?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 314-330.
PenningtonM. (2014). Against democratic education. Social Philosophy & Policy, 31, 1-35.
118.
PerkinsD. N.FaradayM.BusheyB. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In VossJ. F.PerkinsD. N.SegalJ. W. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-105). Erlbaum.
PerskyH. R.DaaneM. C.JinY. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002. U.S. Department of Education Publication No. NCES 2003-529. U.S. Government Printing Office.
PollardE. A. (1867). The lost cause; A new southern history of the war of the confederates. E. B. Treat and Company.
123.
PollockM.RogersJ.KwakoA.MatschinerA.KendallR.BingenerC.ReeceE.KennedyB.HowardJ. (2022). The conflict campaign: Exploring local experiences of the campaign to ban “critical race theory” in public K-12 education in the U.S., 2020-2021. UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.
124.
PritchardD. (2007). Recent work on epistemic value. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 85-110.
125.
PutnamH. (1981). Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge University Press.
126.
PutnamH. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Harvard University Press.
127.
PutnamR. A. (2017). Taking pragmatism seriously (with a reply by H. Putnam). In MacArthurD. (Ed.), Pragmatism as a way of life: The lasting legacy of William James and John Dewey (pp. 14-20). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
ReznitskayaA.WilkinsonI. A. (2021). How best to argue? Examining the role of talk in learning from a sociocultural perspective. In DuncanR. G.ChinnC. A. (Eds.), International handbook of inquiry and learning (pp. 204-220). Routledge.
130.
RodinJ.SteinbergS.P. (Eds.). (2003). Public discourse in America: Conversation and community in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Press.
131.
RortyR. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
132.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing Co.
133.
SantE. (2019). Democratic education: A theoretical review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research, 89, 655-696.
134.
SchmittF. F. (2004). Theories of truth. Blackwell Publishing.
135.
SchoenfeldH. (2018). Building the prison state: Race and the politics of mass incarceration. The University of Chicago Press.
136.
SchreckerE. (1999). Many are the crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton University Press.
SeixasP. (1996). Conceptualizing the growth of historical thinking. In OlsonD. R.TorranceN. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 765-783). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
ShanahanT.ShanahanC. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 7-18.
142.
SimonsJ. (Ed.). (2002). From Kant to Lévi-Strauss: The background to contemporary critical theory. Edinburgh University Press.
143.
SnyderT. (2017). On tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. Tim Duggan Books.
144.
StanovichK. E. (2003). The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: Heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 291-342). Cambridge University Press.
145.
SteinN. L.BernasR. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In AndriessenJ.CoirierP. (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97-116). University of Amsterdam Press.
146.
TomaselloM. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.
147.
TomaselloM. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.
148.
ToulminS. (1972). Human understanding. Volume 1: General introduction and Part 1. The collective use and evolution of concepts. Clarendon Press.
149.
ToulminS. (2003a). Return to reason. Harvard University Press.
150.
ToulminS. (2003b). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
151.
van EemerenF. H.GarssenB.KrabbeE. C. W.Snoeck HenkemansA. F.VerheijB.WagemansJ. H. M. (2013). Handbook of argumentation theory. Springer.
152.
van EemerenF. H.GrootendorstR. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discourse. Foris.
153.
van EemerenF. H.GrootendorstR. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
WhiteR. (2017). The republic for which it stands: The United States during reconstruction and the gilded age, 1865-1896. Oxford University Press.
162.
WiggershausR. (1994). The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories, and political significance. MIT Press.
163.
WigginsG. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve performance. Jossey-Bass.
164.
WineburgS. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Temple University Press.
165.
WineburgS. (2018). Why learn history (when it’s already on your phone). University of Chicago Press.
166.
WineburgS. S. (1991a). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-519.
167.
WineburgS. S. (1991b). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
168.
WissehrC.ConcannonJ.BarrowL. H. (2011). Looking back at the Sputnik era and its impact on science education. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 368-375.
169.
WissingerD. R.DeLaPazS. (2016). Effects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 43-59.
170.
WissingerD. R.De La PazS.JacksonC. (2021). The effects of historical reading and writing strategy instruction with fourth-through sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 49-67.
