Language-oriented literacy standards offer mostly linguistic accounts of text complexity. In response, the present article demonstrates that multimodal and visual narratives offer additional ways to understand and discuss text complexity. This descriptive analysis of one fourth-grader’s comic provides an account of the multimodal patterns and orchestration noted across the pages of the comic. Data sources included the published comic, as well as a multimodal artifact elicitation interview conducted with Sabrina, a fourth-grade student. The authors show how Sabrina constructed a complex multimodal text by drawing not only from her knowledge of image and written language but also from her experiences with spoken language, touch, facial expressions, and gesture. These findings suggest that it would be beneficial for teachers and researchers to continue to create curricular space for multimodal composing opportunities and that stakeholders in language arts and communication education might deepen collaborations to develop instructional frameworks that support students as they compose using modes beyond language across the grade levels.
AndersonK. T.StewartO. G.KachorskyD. (2017). Seeing academically marginalized students’ multimodal designs from a position of strength. Written Communication, 34(2), 104–134.
2.
ArcherA. (2017). Power, social justice and multimodal pedagogies. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 189–199). Routledge.
3.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
4.
BatemanJ.WildfeuerJ.HiippalaT. (2017). Multimodality (Mouton textbook). De Gruyter.
5.
BezemerJ.KressG. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
6.
BishopR. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives, 6(3), ix–xi.
7.
CampanoG.NicholsT. P.PlayerG. D. (2020). Multimodal critical inquiry: Nurturing decolonial imaginaries. In MojeE. B.AfflerbachP. P.EnciscoP.LesauxN. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. V, pp. 137–152). Routledge.
8.
ConnorsS. P. (2012). Toward a shared vocabulary for visual analysis: An analytic toolkit for deconstructing the visual design of graphic novels. Journal of Visual Literacy, 31(1), 71–92.
9.
CowanK.KressG. (2017). Documenting and transferring meaning in the multimodal world: Reconsidering transcription. In SerafiniF.GeeE. (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to New Times (pp. 50–62). Teachers College Press.
10.
DallacquaA. K.PeraltaL. R. (2019). Reading and (re)writing science comics: A study of informational texts. The Reading Teacher, 73(1), 111–118.
11.
DavisD. S.WillsonA. (2015). Practices and commitments of test-centric literacy instruction: Lessons from a testing transition. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 357–379.
12.
de los RíosC. V. (2020). Writing oneself into the curriculum: Photovoice journaling in a secondary ethnic studies course. Written Communication, 37(4), 487–511.
13.
DicksB.FlewittR.LancasterL.PahlK. (2011). Multimodality and ethnography: Working at the intersection. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 227–237.
14.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
15.
FengD.O’HalloranK. L. (2012). Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2067–2084.
16.
FlewittR. (2011). Bringing ethnography to a multimodal investigation of early literacy in a digital age. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 293–310.
17.
FlewittR. S.HampelR.HauckM.LancasterL. (2017). What are multimodal data and transcription? In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 44–60). Routledge.
18.
ForcevilleC. (2005). Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(1), 69–88.
19.
ForcevilleC. (2013). Creative visual duality in comics balloons. In VealeT.FeyaertsK.ForcevilleC. (Eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon (pp. 253–274). De Gruyter.
20.
FreireP. (1968/2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.
21.
GeeJ. P.HayesE. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
22.
GualbertoC.KressG. (2019). Social semiotics. In HobbsR.MihailidisP. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–9). Wiley.
23.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Arnold.
24.
HarperD. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
25.
HassettD. D.CurwoodJ. S. (2009). Theories and practices of multimodal education: The instructional dynamics of picture books and primary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 270–282.
26.
HullG. A.NelsonM. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.
27.
JewittC. (2017). An introduction to multimodality. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 15–30). Routledge.
28.
JiménezL. M.MeyerC. K. (2016). First impressions matter: Navigating graphic novels utilizing linguistic, visual, and spatial resources. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(4), 423–447.
29.
JiménezL. M.RobertsK. L.BrugarK. A.MeyerC. K.WaitoK. (2017). Moving our can(n)ons: Toward an appreciation of multimodal texts in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 71(3), 363–368.
30.
JocsonK. M. (2013). Introduction: Cultural transformations. In JocsonK. M. (Ed.), Cultural transformations: Youth and pedagogies of possibility (pp. 1–13). Harvard Education Press.
31.
JonesK. (2020, June19). Kimberly Jones – Speaking Out About Black Experiences in America [YouTube video]. The Daily Show with Trevor Noah. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1k9APedIUY
32.
KontovourkiS.SiegelM. (2021). “ B is for bunny”: Contested sign-making and the possibilities for performing school literacy differently. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.376
33.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
34.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
35.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
36.
LemkeJ. (1998). Multiplying meaning. In MartinJ. R.VeelR. (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). Routledge.
37.
LimF. V.TowndrowP. A.Min TanJ. (2021). Unpacking the teachers’ multimodal pedagogies in the primary English language classroom in Singapore. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211011783
38.
LimV. F. (2007). The visual semantics stratum: Making meaning in sequential images. In RoyceT. D.BowcherW. (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 195–214). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39.
LowD. E.PandyaJ. Z. (2019). Issues of validity, subjectivity, and reflexivity in multimodal literacy research and analysis. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(1), 1–22.
40.
MartinP. D. (2018). Using structure and form as a rhetorical frame for multimodal composing. The Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 2(2), 135–152.
41.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
42.
MeyerC. K.JiménezL. M. (2017). Using every word and image: Framing graphic novel instruction in the expanded four resources model. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 153–161.
43.
MillsK. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age. Multilingual Matters.
44.
MillsK. A.DoyleK. (2019). Visual arts: A multimodal language for indigenous education. Language and Education, 33(6), 521–543.
45.
MillsK. A.ExleyB. (2014). Narrative and multimodality in English language arts curricula: A tale of two nations. Language Arts, 92(2), 136–143.
46.
MosesL.ReidS. (2021). Supporting literacy and positive identity negotiations with multimodal comic composing. Language and Literacy, 23(1), 1–24.
47.
NewfieldD. (2015). The semiotic mobility of literacy: Four analytical approaches. In RowsellJ.PahlK. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 472–486). Routledge.
48.
OlsonK. (2011). Essentials of qualitative interviewing. Left Coast Press.
49.
PantaleoS. (2012a). Meaning-making with colour in multimodal texts: An 11-year-old student’s purposeful “doing.”Literacy Discussion, 46(3), 147–155.
50.
PantaleoS. (2012b). Middle-school students reading and creating multimodal texts: A case study. Education 3-13, 40(3), 295–314.
51.
PantaleoS. (2019). Metalepsis in elementary students’ multimodal narrative representations. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 8–30.
52.
PatelL. (2021). No study without struggle: Confronting settler colonialism in higher education. Beacon Press.
ReidS. F.CloseK.ScholesJ. (2021). Planned design and curricular messiness in a seventh-grade English classroom. Voices From the Middle, 29(2), 23–26.
55.
ReidS. F.MosesL. (2020). Students become comic book author-illustrators: Composing with words and images in a fourth-grade comics writers’ workshop. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 461–472.
56.
ReidS. F.MosesL. (2021). Rewriting deficit storylines: The positioning of one fourth-grader as comics expert. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 20(3), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0075
57.
ReinkingD.BradleyB. (2008). Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
58.
RoseG. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
59.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
60.
SerafiniF. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multimodal texts. Pedagogies, 7(2), 150–164.
61.
SerafiniF. (2022). Beyond the visual: An introduction to researching multimodal phenomena. Teachers College Press.
62.
SerafiniF.MosesL. (2015). Considering design features. The Reading Teacher, 69(3), 307–309.
63.
SerafiniF.ReidS. F. (2019). Multimodal content analysis: Expanding analytical approaches to content analysis. Visual Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219864133
64.
SiegelM. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.
65.
SiegelM. (2012). New times for multimodality? Confronting the accountability culture. Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 55(8), 671–681.
66.
ToliverS. R. (2021). On mirrors, windows, and telescopes. Council Chronicle, 31(1), 29–30.
67.
TorresF. L. (2021). Reflection and action: Revolutionary love and the possibility for more equitable literacy classrooms. Language Arts, 98(4), 179–188.
68.
TorresF. L. (2022, February). Restorying superheroes [Conference session]. Symposium Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English Assembly for Research, Virtual Conference.
69.
UnsworthL.CopeJ.NichollsL. (2019). Multimodal literacy and large-scale literacy tests: Curriculum relevance and responsibility. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42(2), 128–139.
70.
VasudevanL.SchultzK.BatemanJ. (2010). Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written Communication, 27(4), 442–468.
71.
VERBI Software. (2019). MAXQDA (Version 2020) [Computer software].
72.
WildfeuerJ. (2019). The inferential semantics of comics: Panels and their meanings. Poetics Today, 40(2), 215–234.
