While writing is a critical part of the medical profession, longitudinal studies exploring the social apprenticeship and genre knowledge development of medical practitioners are almost nonexistent. Through interviews and writing samples, this article traces a 10-year journey of one writer’s engagement with the Patient SOAP note, following his experiences from the first year of his undergraduate education to the end of medical school. Drawing upon theories of social apprenticeship and the RIME framework (reporter, interpreter, mediator, educator) from the field of medicine, we offer an in-depth case study of our focal participant’s growing medical expertise as he masters the Patient SOAP note. Through this in-depth analysis, we argue that the SOAP note functions as a “threshold genre” to assist entry into the medical profession. We conclude by offering additional evidence about the role that key threshold genres play in the development of professional expertise and offer implications for genre theory.
AcostaD. A.SkortonD. J. (2021). Making “good trouble”: Time for organized medicine to call for racial justice in medical education and health care. The American Journal of Medicine, 134(10), 1203–1209.
2.
Adler-KassnerL.WardleE. (2015). Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. University Press of Colorado.
3.
AshmoreR. D.DeauxK.McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80.
4.
BeaufortA. (2000). Learning the trade: A social apprenticeship model for gaining writing expertise. Written Communication, 17(2), 185–223.
5.
BeaufortA. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. University Press of Colorado.
6.
BerkenkotterC.HuckinT. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475–509.
CampbellL. (2017). Simulation genres and student uptake: The patient health record in clinical nursing simulations. Written Communication, 34(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317716413
9.
ChanA.SaeteawM.ChuiW. K.LeeJ. Y. C. (2016). Perceptions of pharmacy students and pharmacists on SOAP note education and utility in pharmacy practice. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 77–82.
10.
CowenV. S.KaufmanD.SchoenherrL. (2016). A review of creative and expressive writing as a pedagogical tool in medical education. Medical Education, 50(3), 311–319.
11.
DingH. (2008). The use of cognitive and social apprenticeship to teach a disciplinary genre: Initiation of graduate students into NIH grant writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 3–52.
12.
DiasP.FreedmanA.MedwayP.ParA. (2013). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Routledge.
13.
DriscollD. L.PaszekJ.GorzelskyG.HayesC. L.JonesE. (2020). Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69–103.
14.
El TantawiM.SadafS.AlHumaidJ. (2018). Using gamification to develop academic writing skills in dental undergraduate students. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(1), 15–22.
15.
EmersonL. (2016). The forgotten tribe: Scientists as writers. University Press of Colorado.
16.
FalconerH. M. (2019). “I think when I speak, I don’t sound like that”: The influence of social positioning on rhetorical skill development in science. Written Communication, 36(1), 9–37.
17.
FishmanJ. (Forthcoming). Becoming history. In Telling Stories: Perspectives on Longitudinal Research in Writing Studies. Utah State University Press.
18.
GassS. M.MackeyA. (2013). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.
19.
GrossD.AronsonL. (2013). Writing for change: Public medical writing longitudinal curriculum for medical students (FR407-B). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 45(2), 367–368.
20.
GrumbachK.MendozaR. (2008). Disparities in human resources: addressing the lack of diversity in the health professions. Health Affairs, 27(2), 413–422.
21.
IvaničR. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins.
22.
JonesS. R.McEwenM. K. (2000). A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 41(4), 405–414.
23.
KenzieD.McCallM. (2018). Teaching writing for the health professions: Disciplinary intersections and pedagogical practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 64–79.
24.
LombardM.Snyder-DuchJ.BrackenC. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
25.
MeyerJ.LandR. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines (pp. 412–424). University of Edinburgh.
26.
MillerC. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.
27.
PangaroL.Ten CateO. (2013). Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide No. 78. Medical Teacher, 35(6), e1197–e1210.
28.
PangaroL. N. (2006). A shared professional framework for anatomy and clinical clerkships. Clinical Anatomy, 19(5), 419–428.
29.
PerkinsD. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In MeyerJ.LandR. (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding (pp. 57–71). Routledge.
RawsonR. E.QuinlanK. M.CooperB. J.FewtrellC.MatlowJ. R. (2005). Writing-skills development in the health professions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(3), 233–238.
32.
ReidG. (2019). Compressing, expanding, and attending to scientific meaning: Writing the semiotic hybrid of science for professional and citizen scientists. Written Communication, 36(1), 68–98.
33.
RyanM. S.LeeB.RichardsA.PereraR. A.HaleyK.RigbyF. B.ParkY. S.SantenS. A. (2021). Evaluating the reliability and validity evidence of the RIME (Reporter–Interpreter–Manager–Educator) framework for summative assessments across clerkships. Academic Medicine, 96(2), 256–262.
34.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
35.
SchryerC. F.LingardL.SpaffordM. (2007). Regularized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In ZachryM.ThrallsC. (Eds.), Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations (pp. 21–44). Baywood.
36.
SchryerC. F.LingardL.SpaffordM.GarwoodK. (2003). Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In BazermanC.RussellD. R. (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 62–96). WAC Clearinghouse.
37.
SchryerC. F.SpoelP. (2005). Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 249–278.
38.
SegalJ. Z. (2007). Illness as argumentation: A prolegomenon to the rhetorical study of contestable complaints. Health, 11(2), 227–244.
39.
SpaffordM. M.SchryerC. F.MianM.LingardL. (2006). Look who’s talking: Teaching and learning using the genre of medical case presentations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(2), 121–158.
40.
TardyC. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.
41.
TharenosC. L.HaydenA. M.CookE. (2019). Resident self-portraiture: A reflective tool to explore the journey of becoming a doctor. Journal of Medical Humanities, 40(4), 529–551.
