In this study, we examined burst length and its relation with working memory, attentional control, transcription skills, discourse oral language, and writing quality, using data from English-speaking children in Grade 2 (N = 177; Mage = 7.19). Results from structural equation modeling showed that burst length was related to writing quality after accounting for transcription skills, discourse oral language, working memory, and attentional control. Burst length completely mediated the relations of attentional control and handwriting fluency to writing quality, whereas it partially mediated the relations of working memory and spelling to writing quality. Discourse oral language had a suppression effect on burst length but was positively and independently related to writing quality. Working memory had an indirect relation to burst length via transcription skills, whereas attentional control had a direct and indirect relation. These results suggest roles of domain-general cognitions and transcription skills in burst length, and reveal the nature of their relations to writing quality.
AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 478-508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
2.
AlvesR. A.LimpoT. (2015). Progress in written language bursts, pauses, transcription, and written composition across schooling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(5), 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1059838
3.
AlvesR. A.LimpoT.FidalgoR.CarvalhaisL.PereiraL. A.CastroS. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000089
4.
ArnettA. B.PenningtonB. F.FriendA.WillcuttE. G.ByrneB.SamuelssonS.OlsonR. K. (2013). The SWAN captures variance at the negative and positive end of the ADHD symptom dimension. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17(2), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054711427399
5.
BarnesA.KimY.-S.PhillipsB. (2014). The relations of proper character introduction to narrative quality and listening comprehension for young children from high poverty schools. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(7), 1189-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9481-0
6.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2010). Discourse-level oral language, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in Grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319
8.
BerningerV. W.SwansonH. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In ButterfieldE. (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81). JAI Press.
9.
BerningerV. W.VaughanK.AbbottR. D.BegayK.ColemanK. B.CurtinG.HawkinsJ. M.GrahamS. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291
10.
BerningerV. W.WinnW. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthurC.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96-114). Guilford Press.
CokerD. (2006). Impact of first-grade factors on the growth and outcomes of urban school children’s primary-grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.471
14.
ConnellyV.DockrellJ. E.WalterK.CrittenS. (2012). Predicting the quality of composition and written language bursts from oral language, spelling, and handwriting skills in children with and without specific language impairment. Written Communication, 29(3), 278-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451109
15.
DanemanM.MerikleP. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422-433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546
16.
FerreiraV. S.PashlerH. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1187-1199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187
17.
GillamR. B.PearsonN. A. (2004). Test of Narrative Language. Pro-Ed.
GrahamS.BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.AbbottS. P.WhitakerD. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170
20.
GrahamS.BerningerV. W.FanW. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 516-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
21.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.ChorzempaB. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 669-686. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.669
22.
GrahamS.McArthurC.SchwartzS. (1995). Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.230
23.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS.HarrisK. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
24.
GrahamS.SantangeloT. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(9), 1703-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
25.
HayesJ. R. (2012a). Evidence from language bursts, revision, and transcription for translation and its relation to other writing processes. In FayolM.AlamargotD.BerningerV. W. (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications (pp. 15-25). Psychology Press.
HayesJ. R.ChenowethN. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts?Written Communication, 23(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306286283
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In GreggL. W.SteinbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-29). Lawrence Erlbaum.
HooperS. R.SwartzC. W.WakelyM. B.de KruifR. E. L.MontgomeryJ. W. (2002). Executive function in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500105
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
34.
KauferD. S.HayesJ. R.FlowerL. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 121-140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171073
35.
KelloggR. T. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423513
36.
KelloggR. T.OliveT.PiolatA. (2007). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory in written sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 124(3), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.005
37.
KentS.WanzekJ.PetscherY.Al OtaibaS.KimY.-S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(7), 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1
38.
KimY.-S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293
39.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.PuranikC.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.WagnerR. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004
40.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.WanzekJ.GatlinB. (2015). Towards an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037210
41.
KimY.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension or oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141(January), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
42.
KimY.-S. G. (2017). Multicomponent view of vocabulary acquisition: An investigation with primary grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 120-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.004
43.
KimY.-S. G. (2020). Structural relations of language, cognitive skills, and topic knowledge to written composition: A test of the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 910-932. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12330
44.
KimY.-S. G.GrahamS. (2022). Expanding the Direct and Indirect Effects model of Writing (DIEW): Dynamic relations of component skills to various writing outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000564
45.
KimY.-S. G.ParkS. (2019). Unpacking pathways using the Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Writing (DIEW) and the contributions of higher order cognitive skills to writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(5), 1319-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9913-y
46.
KimY.-S. G.SchatschneiderC. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129
47.
LeslieL.CaldwellJ. S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory (5th ed.). Pearson.
48.
LimpoT.AlvesR. A. (2017). Written language bursts mediate the relationship between transcription skills and writing performance. Written Communication, 34(3), 306-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317714234
49.
LimpoT.AlvesR. A. (2018). Tailoring multicomponent writing interventions: The effects of coupling self-regulation and transcription training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417708170
50.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2007). Learning, attention, writing, and processing speed in typical children and children with ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 469-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040601112773
51.
MillerJ. F.IglesiasA. (2006). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT). University of Wisconsin.
52.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus 8.1 software. Muthén & Muthén.
53.
OlinghouseN. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third- grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(1-2), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1
54.
OliveT.KelloggR. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 594-600. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194960
55.
PengP.MillerA. C. (2016). Does attention training work? A selective meta-analysis to explore the effects of attention training and moderators. Learning and Individual Differences, 45(January), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.012
56.
PerverlyS. T.GarnerJ. K.VekariaP. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x
57.
RansdellS.LevyC. M.KelloggR. T. (2002). The structure of writing processes as revealed by secondary demands. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851300668
58.
SaddlerB.GrahamS. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.43
59.
SantangeloT.GrahamS. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 225-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9335-1
60.
ScottC. M.WindsorJ. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(2), 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4302.324
61.
StephensonK. A.ParillaR. K.GeorgiouG. K.KirbyJ. R. (2008). Effects of home literacy, parents’ beliefs, and children’s task focused behavior on emergent literacy and word reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 24-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701746864
62.
StrasserK.del RioF. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.68
63.
SwansonJ. M.SchuckS.MannM.CarlsonC.HartmanK.SergeantJ. A.McClearyRLakesK.WigalT.(2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of SNAP and SWAN Rating Scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment,10(1), 51-70.
64.
WagnerR. K.PuranikC. S.FoormanB.FosterE.TschinkelE.KantorP. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
65.
WechslerD. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Pearson.
66.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Sage.
