Most of the literature on the assignment traditionally called the research paper focusses on first-year students, and often centers on what they don’t know or can’t do. This article seeks to expand the conversation to one about the skills and knowledge displayed by senior students, and about their perceptions of the universe of academic research and their place in it. It does so by means of a qualitative study of 13 senior students at the University of Calgary. Through interviews, I probe their understanding of their own research processes, how they think they learned to do what they do, and, most important, their understanding of what it means to conduct academic research.
BazermanC. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
BrentD. (2013). The research paper, and why we should still care. Writing Program Administration, 37, 33-53.
3.
BridgemanB.CarlsonS. (1984). Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1, 247-280.
4.
DavisR. L.ShadleM. (2000). Building a mystery: Alternative research writing and the academic act of seeking. College Composition and Communication, 51, 417-447.
5.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
6.
FordJ.PerryD. R. (1982). Research paper instruction in the undergraduate writing program. College English, 44, 825-831.
7.
HoodC. L. (2010). Ways of research: The status of the traditional research paper assignment in first-year writing/composition courses. Composition Forum, 22, n.p. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080510
8.
HowardR. M.RodrigueT.ServissT. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing and Pedagogy, 2, 177-192.
9.
HutchinsE.FisterB.MacPhersonK. (2002). Changing landscapes, enduring values: Making the transition from bibliographic instruction to information literacy. Journal of Library Administration, 36, 3-19.
10.
KantzM. J. (1989). Written rhetorical synthesis: Processes and products (Tech. Rep. 17). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED303821
11.
LarsonR. L. (1982). The “research paper” in the writing course: A non-form of writing. College English, 44, 811-816.
LeaM. (1998). Academic literacies and learning in higher education: Constructing knowledge through texts and experience. Studies in the Education of Adults, 30, 156-171.
14.
LeaM.L.StreetB. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157-172.
15.
LeaM. L.StreetB. V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45, 368-377.
16.
LeckieG. (1996). Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22, 201-208.
17.
ManningA. N. (1961). The present status of the research paper in freshman English: A national survey. College Composition and Communication, 12, 73-78.
18.
MelzerD. (2009). Writing assignments across the curriculum: A national survey of college writing. College Composition and Communication, 62, 240-261.
19.
NelsonJ. (1992). Constructing a research paper: A study of students’ goals and approaches (Tech. Rep. 59). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/680
20.
NelsonJ. (1995). Reading classrooms as text: Exploring student writers’ interpretive practices. College Composition and Communication, 46, 411-429.
21.
NelsonJ.HayesJ. R. (1988). How the writing context shapes college students’ strategies for writing from sources (Tech. Rep. 16). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/602
22.
PurdyJ. P.WalkerJ. R. (2012). Liminal spaces and research identity: The construction of introductory composition students as researchers. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 13, 9-41.
23.
RussellD. R. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In PetragliaJ. (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
RussellD. R.LeaM.ParkerJ.StreetB.DonahueT. (2009). Exploring notions of genre in “academic literacies” and “writing across the curriculum”: Approaches across countries and contexts. In BazermanC.BoniniA.FigueiredoD. (Eds.), Genre in a changing world: Perspectives on writing (pp. 395-423). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.
25.
SchweglerR. A.ShamoonL. K. (1982). The aims and processes of the research paper. College English, 44, 817-824.
26.
SilvaM. L. (2011). Can I Google that? A study of the multiple literacy practices of undergraduate students in a research-writing course (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.
