The study takes a situated and material approach to texts and writing practices and examines writing ethnographically as it transpires and displayed in museums. The ethnography highlights the richness and sociality embodied in writing practices as well as the ideological, communal, and ritualistic functions that writing and texts serve in cultural institutions. Specifically, I offer a comparative study of visitor books and similar writing platforms in two Jewish heritage museums in the United States. Extended ethnographic observations of visitors’ writing activities are augmented by analysis of visitors’ texts, which, following Bakhtin, are understood in terms of their addressivity structures or whom they are addressed to. The study shows how visitors’ texts amount to collective contributions that are part of museums’ heritage display, and that visitors become rhetors when their mode of heritage consumption is the production of texts.
AllisonC. (2013). Addressivity and the monument: Memorials, publics and the Yezidis of Armenia. History and Memory, 25(1), 145-181.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (McGeeV. W., Trans.). In Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BarberK. (2009). I. B. Akinyele and early Yoruba print culture. In PetersonD.MacolG. (Eds.), Recasting the past: History writing and political work in Modern Africa (pp. 31-49). Athens: Ohio University Press.
4.
BartonD. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
5.
BartonD.PapenU. (Eds.). (2011). The anthropology of writing: Understanding textually-mediated worlds. London, UK: Continuum.
6.
BazermanC.PriorP. A. (Eds.). (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BlairC. (1999). Contemporary U.S. memorial sites as exemplars of rhetoric’s materiality. In SelzerJ.CrowleyS. (Eds.), Rhetorical bodies (pp. 16-57). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8.
BlairC.MichelN. (2000). Reproducing civil rights tactics: The rhetorical performances of the Civil Rights Memorial. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30(2), 31-55.
9.
BlairC.MichelN. (2007). The AIDS Memorial Quilt and the contemporary culture of public commemoration. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 10(4), 595-626.
10.
BlommaertJ. (2004). Writing as a problem: African grassroots writing, economies of literacy, and globalization. Language in Society, 33(5), 643-671.
11.
BlommaertJ. (2013). Writing as a sociolinguistic object. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(4), 440-459.
DickinsonG.BlairC.OttB. L. (Eds.). (2010). Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
14.
GalS. (2005). Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public/private. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 23-37.
15.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
16.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
HaasC. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
HaasC. (1999). Materializing public and private. In SelzerJ.CrowleyS. (Eds.), Rhetorical bodies (pp. 218-238). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19.
HymesD. H. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
20.
KatrielT. (1997). Performing the past: A study of Israeli settlement museums. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
KressG. R.Van LeeuwenT. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
LevinsonS. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In DrewP.WoottonA. J. (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161-227). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
23.
LillisT. M. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.
24.
LillisT. M. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
25.
MacdonaldS. (2005). Accessing audiences: Visiting visitor books. Museum and Society, 3(3), 119-136.
26.
NoyC. (2007a). A narrative community: Voices of Israeli backpackers. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
27.
NoyC. (2007b). Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
28.
NoyC. (2008). Writing ideology: Hybrid symbols in a commemorative visitor book in Israel. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 18(1), 62-81.
29.
NoyC. (2009). “I WAS HERE!”: Addressivity structures and inscribing practices as indexical resources. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 421-440.
30.
NoyC. (2011). The Aesthetics of Qualitative (Re)search: Performing Ethnography at a Heritage Museum. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(10): 917-929.
31.
NoyC. (2015). Thank you for dying for our country: Commemorative texts and performances in Jerusalem. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
PriorP. A. (2004). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In BazermanC.PriorP. A. (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
PriorP. A. (2009). From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing. In BazermanC.BoniniA.FigueiredoD. (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp.17-34). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
34.
RamptonB. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584-607.
35.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
36.
SelzerJ. (1999). Habeas corpus: An introduction. In SelzerJ.CrowleyS. (Eds.), Rhetorical bodies (pp. 3-15). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
SelzerJ.CrowleyS. (Eds.). (1999). Rhetorical bodies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
StamouA. G.ParaskevolpoulosS. (2004). Images of nature by tourism and environmentalist discourses in visitors books: A critical discourse analysis of ecotourism. Discourse & Society, 15(1), 105-129.
39.
StewartS. (1984). On longing: Narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
ThorntonT. P. (1996). Handwriting in America: A cultural history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
TustingK.MaybinJ. (2007). Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 575-583.
42.
WickmanC. (2010). Writing material in chemical physics research: The laboratory notebook as locus of technical and textual integration. Written Communication, 27(3), 259-292.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
