This study examines a social network site (SNS) where specific interlocutors communicate by combining aspects of academic American English (AE), digital language (DL), and African American Language (AAL)—creating a digital form of AAL or digital AAL (DAAL). This article describes the features of DAAL in the discursive, online context of MySpace, by analyzing a corpus of DAAL comments (1,494 instances). The use of SNSs affords a space where AAL exists in written form, serving the function of approximating spoken AAL. More interesting, however, is the function that DAAL serves as a text that is visually distinct from AE, emphasizing the orthographic freedom of DAAL on SNSs. By examining how DL and AAL exist and combine in an SNS environment, this research found DAAL to be a robust form of written communication.
ArnezN. (1980). Black poetry: A necessary ingredient for survival and liberation. Journal of Black Studies, 11(1), 3-22.
2.
BakerH.Jr. (1990). Long Black song: Essays in Black American literature. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
3.
BanksA. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BanksA. J. (2011). Digital griots: African American rhetoric in a multimedia age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
5.
BaronN. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BartonE. (1994). Interpreting the discourses of technology. In SelfeC.HilligossS. (Eds.), Literacy and computers (pp. 56-75). New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
7.
BerelsonB. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.
8.
BrandtD. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Cook-GumperzJ. (2006). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CrawfordC. (Ed.). (2001). Ebonics and language education. New York, NY: Sankofa.
11.
CrystalD. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CrystalD. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
CrystalD. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DysonA. H. (2005). Crafting “the humble prose of living”: Rethinking oral/written relations in the echoes of the spoken word. English Education, 37(2), 290-297.
16.
EganT. M. (2002). Grounded theory research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 277-295.
17.
GeeJ. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
GilyardK. (1991). Voices of the self: A study of language competence. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
19.
GilyardK. (2001). It ain’t hard to tell: Distinguishing fact from fallacy in the Ebonics controversy. In CrawfordC. (Ed.), Ebonics and language education (pp. 202-213). New York, NY: Sankofa.
20.
GilyardK. (2011). True to the language game: African American discourse, culture, politics, and pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
22.
GraffH. J. (1986). The legacies of literacy: Continuities and contradictions in Western society and culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23.
GreenL. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GurakL. (2001). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
HaasC.CarrB.TakayoshiP. (2011). Building and maintaining contexts in interactive networked writing: An examination of deixis and intertextuality in instant messaging. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(3), 276-298.
26.
HaasC.TakayoshiP. (2011). Young people’s everyday literacies: The language features of instant messaging. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(4), 378-404.
27.
HaddixM. (2010). No longer on the margins: Researching the hybrid literate identities of Black and Latina preservice teachers. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 97-123.
28.
HargittaiE. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html
29.
HeathS. B. (1988). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever-shifting oral and literature traditions. In KintgenE. R.KrollB. M.RoseM. (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 348-370). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
31.
KinlochV. F. (2005). Poetry, literacy, and creativity: Fostering the effective learning strategies in an urban classroom. English Education, 37(2), 96-114.
32.
KressG. (1990). Linguistic process and sociocultural practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.
34.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
LabovW. (1969). The study of nonstandard English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and Center for Applied Linguistics.
36.
LewisC.FabosB. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470-501.
37.
NehusiK. S. K. (2001). From Medew Netjer to Ebonics. In CrawfordC. (Ed.), Ebonics and language education (pp. 56-122). New York, NY: Sankofa.
38.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
OlsonD. R. (1994). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60(1), 83-104.
40.
OngW. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London, UK: Methuen.
41.
PalacasA. L. (2001). Liberating American Ebonics from Euro-English. College English, 63(1), 326-352.
42.
Perryman-ClarkS. M. (2013). African American language, rhetoric, and students’ writing: New directions for SRTOL. College Composition and Communication, 64(3), 469-495.
43.
ReddT.WebbK. S. (2005). A teacher’s introduction to African American English: What a writing teacher should know. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of English.
44.
RichardsonE. (2011). African American language in online German hip-hop. In YoungV. A.MartinezA. (Eds.), Code-meshing as world English: Pedagogy, policy, performance (pp. 231-256). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
45.
RickfordJ. R.RickfordR. J. (2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. New York, NY: John Wiley.
46.
RonkinM.KarnH. E. (1999). Linguistic racism in parodies of Ebonics on the Internet. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(3), 360-380.
47.
SchultzK.HullG. (2002). Locating literacy theory in out-of-school contexts. In HullG.SchultzK. (Eds.), School’s out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice (pp. 11-31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
ScribnerS.ColeM. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
SelfeC. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
50.
SmithE. (2001). Ebonics and bilingual education of the African American child. In CrawfordC. (Ed.), Ebonics and language education (pp. 123-163). New York, NY: Sankofa.
51.
SmithermanG. (1977). Talkin and testifyin. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
52.
SmithermanG. (2001). A commentary on Ebonics: From a ghetto lady turned critical linguist. In CrawfordC. (Ed.), Ebonics and language education (pp. 214-234). New York, NY: Sankofa.
53.
SmithermanG. (2006). Word from the mother: Language and African Americans. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
StreetB. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
ThelwallM.StuartD. (2009). Social network sites: An exploration of features and diversity. In ZaphirisP.AngC. S. (Eds.), Social computing and virtual communities (pp. 263-282). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
56.
WolframW.HazenK.TamburroJ. R. (1997). Isolation within isolation: A solitary century of African-American Vernacular English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(1), 7-38.
