Theorists of multiliteracies, social semiotics, and the New Literacy Studies have drawn attention to the potential changing nature of writing and literacy in the context of networked communications. This article reports findings from a design-based research project in Year 4 classrooms (students aged 8.5-10 years) in a low socioeconomic status school. A new writing program taught students how to design multimodal and digital texts across a range of genres and text types, such as web pages, online comics, video documentaries, and blogs. The authors use Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device to theorize the pedagogic struggles and resolutions in remaking English through the specialization of time, space, and text. The changes created an ideological struggle as new writing practices were adapted from broader societal fields to meet the instructional and regulative discourses of a conventional writing curriculum.
AckermanJ. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10(3), 334-370.
2.
AdamsB. (1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
ApplebeeA.LangerJ. (2009). What is happening in the teaching of writing. English Journal, 98(5), 18-28.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Census of population and housing: Selected social and housing characteristics Australia and statistics local areas: Logan. Canberra: Australian Government.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). Australian curriculum—English Version 6.0. Canberra: Australian Government.
7.
BartonD. (2001). Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education, 15(2-3), 92-104.
8.
BennettS.MatonK. (2010). Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321-331.
9.
BernsteinB. (1990). Class, codes, and control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Vol. 4). London, UK: Routledge.
10.
BernsteinB. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, and critique. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
BezemerJ. (2008). Displaying orientation in the classroom: Students’ multimodal responses to teacher instructions. Linguistics and Education, 19(2), 166-178.
12.
BrownA.AshD.RutherfordM.NakagawaK.GordonA.CampioneJ. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BuckinghamD. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43-55.
14.
CarspeckenP. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CazdenC. (1995). Visible and invisible pedagogies in literacy education. In AtkinsonP.DaviesB.DelamontS. (Eds.), Discourse and reproduction: Essays in honour of Basil Bernsteinz (pp. 161-174). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
ChristieF. (1999). The pedagogic device and the teaching of English. In ChristieF. (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness (pp. 156-184). London, UK: Cassell.
18.
ComberB.NixonH. (2008). Spatial literacies: Emergent pedagogies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(4), 221-240.
19.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
20.
Council of Australian Governments. (2009). National partnerships agreement on low socio-economic status school communities. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.coag.gov.au/
DaltonB.ProctorC.UccelliP.MoE.SnowC. E. (2011). Designing for diversity: The role of reading strategies in interactive vocabulary in a digital reading environment for fifth-grade monolingual English and bilingual students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(1), 68-100.
23.
ExleyB.Richard-BossezA. (2013). The ABCs of teaching alphabet knowledge: Affordances and challenges of “weaving” visible and invisible pedagogies. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(4), 345-356.
24.
GrantL. (2006). Using wikis in school: A case study. London, UK: Future Lab.
25.
HagoodM. C. (2003). New media and online literacies: No age left behind. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 387-391.
26.
HallidayM. A. K.HasanR. (1989). Language, context, text: Aspects of language in a social, semiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
HeathS. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HelgøyI.HommeA.GewirtzS. (2007). Introduction to special issue: Local autonomy or state control? Exploring the effects of new forms of regulation in education. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 198-202.
29.
HorstH. A. (2009). From MySpace to Facebook: Coming of age in networked public culture. In MizukoI.BaumerS.BittantiM.BoydD.CodyR.HerrB. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media (pp. 83-99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
JewittC. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241-267.
31.
KnobelM.LankshearC. (Eds.). (2007). A new literacies sampler (Vol. 29). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32.
KressG. (2000). Multimodality. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
33.
LamE. W. S. (2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377-397.
34.
LankshearC. (with GeeJ. P.KnobelM.SearleC.). (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
35.
LeanderK. (2003). Writing travellers’ tales on new literacyscapes. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 392-397.
36.
LeanderK. (2009). Composing with old and new media: Toward a parallel pedagogy. In CarringtonV.RobinsonM. (Eds.), Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices (pp. 147-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LeanderK.SheehyM. (Eds.). (2004). Spatializing literacy research. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
38.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
39.
LemkeJ. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In MartinJ. R.VeelR. (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87-114). London, UK: Routledge.
40.
LukeA. (2008). Digital innovation in schooling: Policy efficacy, youth cultures and pedagogical change. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
41.
LukeA.FreebodyP. (1997). Shaping the social practices of reading. In MusprattS.LukeA.FreebodyP. (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185-225). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
42.
MillsK. A. (2010). A review of the digital turn in the New Literacy Studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246-271.
43.
MillsK.A. (2010b). Filming in progress: New spaces for multimodal designing. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 14-28.
44.
Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (2012). National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy. Retrieved from http://www.naplan.edu.au/home_page.html
45.
MossG. (2000). Informal literacies and pedagogic discourse. Linguistics and Education, 11(1), 47-64.
46.
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-38). South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
47.
RankerJ. (2008). Making meaning on the screen: Digital video production about the Dominican Republic. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(5), 410-422.
48.
SinghP. (1993). Institutional discourse and practice: A case study of the social construction of technological competence in the primary classroom. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 14(1), 39-58.
49.
SojaE. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Oxford, UK: Verso.
50.
StreetB. V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.
51.
StreetB. V. (2005). Recent applications of New Literacy Studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 417-423.
52.
SuhrK. A.HernandezD. A.GrimesD.WarschauerM. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Computing, 9(5), 5-43.
53.
UnsworthL. (2006). E-literature for children: Enhancing digital literacy learning. London, UK: Routledge.
